NCT02250703

Brief Summary

BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND RATIONALE Pediatric patients scheduled for dental procedures under general anesthesia can have significant anxiety before the procedure. They are commonly pre medicated to minimize distress and to facilitate a smooth induction of anesthesia. Oral Midazolam at 0.5mg/kg dose is more widely used for this purpose . However the commonly used maximum dose is up to 15mg. It also has many limitations such as paradoxical reaction, increased incidence of emergence delirium and negative postoperative behavior changes . Intranasal dexmedetomidine has been used an effective and safe alternative premedication to oral midazolam in children. At a dose of 2micrograms/kg, intranasal dexmedetomidine as premedication resulted in excellent sedation in children aged 5-8yrs with no adverse hemodynamic effects. It has other advantages such as providing analgesia and facilitating smooth emergence from anesthesia. The goal of this study is to find out if intranasal dexmedetomidine is a superior alternative as premedication to oral midazolam in children weighing more than 20kg undergoing general anesthesia for dental rehabilitation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
75

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 5, 2014

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 26, 2014

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2016

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 7, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

July 7, 2017

Status Verified

June 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

September 5, 2014

Results QC Date

January 9, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 29, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Premedication

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • University of Michigan Sedation Scale

    Level of sedation at separation from parents and at the time of mask induction will be measured on a scale of 0 to 4 (University of Michigan Sedation Scale) University of Michigan Sedation Scale: 0 -Awake/Alert 1 -Minimally Sedated: Tired/sleepy, appropriate response to verbal conversation and/or sounds. 2- Moderately Sedated: Somnolent/sleeping, easily aroused with light tactile stimulation. 3 - Deeply Sedated: Deep sleep, arousable only with significant physical stimulation. 4 - Unarousable Moderately and Deeply sedated: Satisfactory Awake, minimally sedate, unarousable: Unsatisfactory

    Day 0:Just before the patient will be brought to the operating room

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Acceptance of Mask Induction

    Day 0: At the time when anesthesia is induced

  • Wake up Behavior

    Day 0: At the end of surgery when the patient recovers from anesthesia

  • Presence of Amnesia to Mask Induction

    Day 0: at the time of discharge of the patient from the recovery room

Study Arms (2)

Midazolam

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In M group, patients will be given oral midazolam 0.5mg/kg upto maximum dose of 15mg (5mg/ml parenteral preparation) mixed with flavored syrup as premedication

Drug: Midazolam

Dexmedetomidine

EXPERIMENTAL

In D group, patients will be given intranasal dexmedetomidine 2mcg/kg upto maximum dose of 100mcg prepared from 100mcg/ml parenteral preparation (Hospira R) . The drug will be administered using a intranasal mucosal administration device (LMA MAD NasalTM).

Drug: Dexmedetomidine

Interventions

oral midazolam 0.5mg/kg upto maximum dose of 15mg

Midazolam

intranasal dexmedetomidine 2mcg/kg upto maximum dose of 100mcg

Dexmedetomidine

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Children older than 5yrs and weighing more than 20kg , who are scheduled for ambulatory dental rehabilitation at Batson operating rooms.
  • ASA classification 1 or 2

You may not qualify if:

  • Known allergy to midazolam, dexmedetomidine,morphine, fentanyl, sevoflurane and propofol.
  • uncorrected congenital heart disease or history of cardiac arrhythmia,
  • children at risk for airway obstruction (OSA or cranio facial syndrome),
  • pregnant minors

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Children's of Mississippi/University of Mississipi Medical Center

Jackson, Mississippi, 39216, United States

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Bell C, Weisman S, Hofstadter MB, Rimar S. Premedication in the United States: a status report. Anesth Analg. 1997 Feb;84(2):427-32. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199702000-00035.

    PMID: 9024042BACKGROUND
  • Lonnqvist PA, Habre W. Midazolam as premedication: is the emperor naked or just half-dressed? Paediatr Anaesth. 2005 Apr;15(4):263-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01600.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15787915BACKGROUND
  • Kanegaye JT, Favela JL, Acosta M, Bank DE. High-dose rectal midazolam for pediatric procedures: a randomized trial of sedative efficacy and agitation. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2003 Oct;19(5):329-36. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000092578.40174.85.

    PMID: 14578832BACKGROUND
  • McGraw T, Kendrick A. Oral midazolam premedication and postoperative behaviour in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 1998;8(2):117-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.1998.00724.x.

    PMID: 9549736BACKGROUND
  • Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Krivutza DM, Weinberg ME, Wang SM, Gaal D. Trends in the practice of parental presence during induction of anesthesia and the use of preoperative sedative premedication in the United States, 1995-2002: results of a follow-up national survey. Anesth Analg. 2004 May;98(5):1252-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000111183.38618.d8.

  • Yuen VM, Hui TW, Irwin MG, Yuen MK. A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam for premedication in pediatric anesthesia: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jun;106(6):1715-21. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816c8929.

  • Akin A, Bayram A, Esmaoglu A, Tosun Z, Aksu R, Altuntas R, Boyaci A. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication of pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Sep;22(9):871-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03802.x. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

  • Sheta SA, Al-Sarheed MA, Abdelhalim AA. Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Feb;24(2):181-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12287. Epub 2013 Nov 15.

  • Yuen VM, Hui TW, Irwin MG, Yao TJ, Chan L, Wong GL, Shahnaz Hasan M, Shariffuddin II. A randomised comparison of two intranasal dexmedetomidine doses for premedication in children. Anaesthesia. 2012 Nov;67(11):1210-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07309.x. Epub 2012 Sep 5.

  • Sathyamoorthy M, Hamilton TB, Wilson G, Talluri R, Fawad L, Adamiak B, Wallace C, Borissova I, Heard C. Pre-medication before dental procedures: A randomized controlled study comparing intranasal dexmedetomidine with oral midazolam. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Oct;63(9):1162-1168. doi: 10.1111/aas.13425. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

MidazolamDexmedetomidine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BenzodiazepinesBenzazepinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring

Limitations and Caveats

All the consecutive patients were screened for eligibility. Patients were not selected on the basis of need for premedication.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Madhankumar Sathyamoorthy. PI
Organization
University of Mississippi Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Madhankumar Sathyamoorthy, MBBS, MS

    University of Mississippi Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2014

First Posted

September 26, 2014

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion

September 1, 2016

Study Completion

September 1, 2016

Last Updated

July 7, 2017

Results First Posted

July 7, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No plan to share IPD

Locations