AttraX® Putty vs. Autograft in XLIF®
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical success of AttraX Putty as a bone graft substitute for autograft in XLIF procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 26, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 21, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 21, 2021
CompletedDecember 22, 2025
December 1, 2025
6.5 years
September 23, 2014
December 16, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The number and percentage of subjects with radiographically apparent fusion 24 months.
The number and percentage of subjects with radiographically apparent fusion 24 months.
24-months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The rate of complications attributable to the use of AttraX and ICBG autograft.
Post-op to 24-months
The change in self-reported clinical outcomes scores from baseline through 24 month follow-up, including VAS (back, leg, and iliac crest pain), ODI, EQ5D, and SF-36.
Pre-op through 24-months
The morbidity associated graft harvest as measured by operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, and infection rate.
Surgery through 24-months
Study Arms (2)
AttraX Putty
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient will be treated with AttraX Putty intraoperatively.
Iliac Crest Bone Graft (ICBG)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be treated with ICBG harvested during surgery.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Persistent back and/or leg pain unresponsive to conservative treatment for at least 6 months, unless surgical treatment is clinically indicated sooner
- Indicated for a single-level XLIF between L1 and L5 with bilateral percutaneous pedicle screws
- Objective evidence of primary diagnosis must be confirmed by appropriate imaging studies
- years of age at the date of written informed consent
- Able to undergo surgery based on physical exam, medical history, and surgeon judgment
- Expected to survive at least 2 years beyond surgery
- Willing and able to return for post-treatment exams according to the follow-up called for in the protocol
- Signed and dated informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Mental or physical condition that would limit the ability to comply with study requirements
- Spine abnormality requiring treatment at more than one level
- Previous failed fusion at any spinal level
- Prior fusion procedure at operative level (i.e., no revision of operative level)
- Systemic or local infection; active or latent
- Diseases that significantly inhibit bone healing (e.g., prior diagnosis of osteoporosis, metabolic bone disease)
- Treatment with pharmaceuticals interfering with calcium metabolism
- Undergoing chemotherapy or radiation treatment
- Chronic use of steroids (defined as more than 6 weeks of steroid use within 12 months of surgery, other than episodic use or inhaled corticosteroids)
- Involvement in active litigation relating to the spine (worker's compensation claim is allowed if it is not contested)
- Significant general illness (e.g., HIV, active metastatic cancer of any type, uncontrolled diabetes, dialysis dependent renal failure, symptomatic liver disease)
- Immunocompromised or is being treated with immunosuppressive agents
- Pregnant, or plans to become pregnant during the study
- Subject is a prisoner
- Participating in another clinical study that would confound study data
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NuVasivelead
Study Sites (1)
Mater Dei Hospital
Barro Prêto, Minas Gerais, 30140-093, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cristiano M Menezes, M.D.
Lifecenter to Mater Dei Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2014
First Posted
September 26, 2014
Study Start
December 1, 2014
Primary Completion
May 21, 2021
Study Completion
May 21, 2021
Last Updated
December 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share