Brain Stimulation and Hand Training in Children With Hemiparesis
Synergistic Effect of Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/Constraint Induced Movement Therapy in Children With Hemiparesis
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Hemiparetic cerebral palsy influences motor function in children during development and throughout their lifetime. The deficits one sees are the result both of the congenitally induced brain lesion and the subsequent plasticity that can impair function of the surviving neurons in the damaged brain. Many current treatments have limited influence on children's neurorecovery. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) involving constraining the unaffected limb to encourage use of the affected limb has shown promise, yet with new technology revealing the potential to directly influence the brain, there is an urgent need to study the synergy of combined techniques. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) as a direct neuromodulatory intervention has the potential to act synergistically with CIMT to influence neurorecovery. Combining behavioral therapies, constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT), with a novel form of neuromodulation, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), we investigated the influence of this intervention on improved motor outcomes in children with cerebral palsy. The study hypotheses surround the safety, feasibility and efficacy of combined CIMT and tDCS wherein those children who receive the combined intervention will reveal no major adverse events, yet improved hand function and cortical excitability. To Note: In addition to the combination of NIBS with CIMT, we also investigated the combination of NIBS with another form of motor intervention, bimanual, or two-handed, training. During bimanual training, children engage both hands in movements. The goal of bimanual training is to teach children how to most effectively use their hands cooperatively. During bimanual training, children play with games and toys that require the use of both hands. Children also practice activities of daily living that require the use of both hands, such as putting hair in a ponytail, tying shoes, and buttoning clothing. N=8 for this pilot study and no randomization. (Burke Medical Research Institute partnered with Columbia University and did a parallel pilot study. N=8 (PIs Friel and Gordon; Protocol BRC449)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 26, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 31, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 10, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 18, 2020
CompletedAugust 18, 2020
August 1, 2020
2.5 years
September 18, 2014
December 9, 2019
August 6, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)
Participants were videotaped while performing a bimanual age-appropriate activity. Investigators scored this performance using the Assessment of Assisting Hand (AHA) inventory. The AHA consists of 22 items, each scored on a 4-point scale. Raw scores are a sum of the 22 item scores, ranging from 22-88. Computer software logarithmically transforms ordinal raw scores into a final score. Final scores are reported on a logit-based AHA-unit scale and range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater ability. Outcome is reported as the change from baseline to 2 weeks and change from baseline to 6 months.
2 weeks, 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Canadian Occupational Performance Measurement (COPM)
2 weeks, 6 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Change in Subject Symptom Assessment (SSA) From 2 Weeks to 6 Months
2 weeks, 6 months
Study Arms (2)
tDCS/CIMT
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention Group will receive 20 minutes of 1.0 mA tDCS to the contralesional hemisphere concurrent with CIMT.
tDCS sham/CIMT
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo Group will receive 20 minutes of sham 1.0 mA tDCS to the contralesional hemisphere concurrent with CIMT.
Interventions
10 tDCS/CIMT Sessions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Hemispheric Stroke or Periventricular Leukomalacia confirmed by most recent MRI or CT radiologic report with resultant congenital hemiparesis
- ≥ 10 degrees of active motion at the metacarpophalangeal joint
- Receptive language function to follow two-step commands as evidenced by performance on TOKEN test of intelligence
- No evidence of seizure activity within the last 2 years
- Presence of a motor evoked potential from at least the contralesional hemisphere if not both hemispheres
- Ages 8-21 years
- Able to give informed assent along with the informed consent of the legal guardian
- Children who have had surgeries, which may influence motor function eg- tendon transfer, will be included, yet surgical history will be documented and included in any publication within a participant characteristics table.
You may not qualify if:
- Metabolic Disorders
- Neoplasm
- Epilepsy
- Disorders of Cellular Migration and Proliferation
- Acquired Traumatic Brain Injury
- Pregnancy
- Indwelling metal or incompatible medical devices
- Evidence of skin disease or skin abnormalities
- Botulinum toxin or Phenol block within \[six-months\] preceding the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Minnesotalead
- Cerebral Palsy International Research Foundationcollaborator
- Foundation for Physical Therapy, Inc.collaborator
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)collaborator
Study Sites (2)
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101, United States
Related Publications (2)
Gillick B, Menk J, Mueller B, Meekins G, Krach LE, Feyma T, Rudser K. Synergistic effect of combined transcranial direct current stimulation/constraint-induced movement therapy in children and young adults with hemiparesis: study protocol. BMC Pediatr. 2015 Nov 12;15:178. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0498-1.
PMID: 26558386BACKGROUNDLixandrao MC, Stinear JW, Rich T, Chen CY, Feyma T, Meekins GD, Gillick BT. EMG breakthrough during cortical silent period in congenital hemiparesis: a descriptive case series. Braz J Phys Ther. 2020 Jan-Feb;24(1):20-29. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
PMID: 30471965DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Bernadette Gillick
- Organization
- University of Minnesota
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bernadette T Gillick, PhD, MSPT, PT
University of Minnesota
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2014
First Posted
September 26, 2014
Study Start
December 31, 2014
Primary Completion
June 28, 2017
Study Completion
July 10, 2017
Last Updated
August 18, 2020
Results First Posted
August 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08