Efficacy and Safety of Talsaclidine in Patients With Mild to Moderate Dementia of Alzheimer Type
Efficacy and Safety of 6, 12, 24, and 36 mg Tid po and 36 mg Bid po Talsaclidine (Free Base) for 12 Weeks in a Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Parallel Group Comparison in Patients With Mild to Moderate Dementia of Alzheimer Type
1 other identifier
interventional
362
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The objective of this trial was to assess the dose-response relationship of symptomatic efficacy of talsaclidine base on ADAScog and to assess safety and tolerability
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 alzheimer-disease
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 1999
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2000
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2014
CompletedSeptember 26, 2014
September 1, 2014
1 year
September 23, 2014
September 25, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive part (ADAScog)
Baseline, week 12
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Change in ADAScog (extension)
Baseline, week 4, 8 and 12
Change in ADAScog (Total)
Baseline, week 4, 8 and 12
Change in mini mental state (MMS)
Screening, week 12
Change in neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI)
Baseline, week 12
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Screening, week 12
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (6)
Talsaclidine, 6 mg tid
EXPERIMENTALTalsaclidine, 12 mg tid
EXPERIMENTALTalsaclidine, 24 mg tid
EXPERIMENTALTalsaclidine, 36 mg tid
EXPERIMENTALTalsaclidine, 36 mg bid
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female patient, age: over 40 years (lower age if genetic Dementia of Alzheimer Type (DAT) is documented. Patients over 85 years need to be in a clinically stable state (investigator's judgement)
- Patient's educational level is \> 4 years
- Patient is able to understand the patient information and give informed consent
- Patient has given written informed consent in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and local legislation
- Patient has a non-demented relative or care giver who is willing to support the clinical trial; his/her written informed consent is optional
- Body weight: within +/- 30% of normal weight (Broca index)
- Diagnosis of DAT by the National Institute of Neurological and communicative Disorders-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorder Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria
- MMS-score 10 - 24 inclusive
- Rosen ischemia score is lower or equal to two
- Patient is able to complete the trial examinations, to hear, speak, read and write in a basic way and primary sensorial functions are intact
You may not qualify if:
- Any dementia of vascular genesis (excluded by Rosen ischemia score \> 2)
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computer Tomogram (CT) (more recent than 12 months; if a MRI of CT recording is performed more than 12 months before study entry, it must be repeated) findings make the diagnosis of DAT unlikely
- Any stroke history
- Cranio-cerebral trauma
- Intoxication (incl. history of alcohol and drug abuse)
- Cerebral infections (e.g. neurosyphilis)
- Thyroid dysfunction
- Cerebral dysfunction due to metabolic disorders (e.g. unstable thyroid dysfunction, or unstable insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus with hypo-/hyper-glycemic episodes)
- Deficiency of vitamin B12 or folic acid as a reason of dementia
- Brain tumour (A patient with an incidental tumour found on CT not felt to be clinically relevant may be included, i.e.: meningioma)
- Down's syndrome, Parkinsonism, Huntington's chorea
- Multiple sclerosis
- Major depression defined by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) 17 item scale (≥ 16)
- Depressive pseudo dementia
- Mental retardation
- +19 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2014
First Posted
September 25, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 1999
Primary Completion
January 1, 2000
Last Updated
September 26, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-09