Study Stopped
Lack of enrollment
Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Laser Ablation of the Incompetent Small Saphenous Vein
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to perform a randomized, prospective trial comparing the two current methods of treatment for chronic venous insufficiency related to the Small Saphenous Vein (SSV) to evaluate complications and outcomes for each method, and ultimately, to see if one is superior to the other.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Sep 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 29, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 29, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 7, 2019
CompletedFebruary 7, 2019
September 1, 2018
8.6 years
September 2, 2014
February 1, 2018
September 11, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Recurrent Clinical Symptoms of an Incompetent Small Saphenous Vein After Treatment.
At 10 years after treatment.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Incidence Rate of Acute Complications
1 and 6 weeks post intervention.
Other Outcomes (1)
Incidence of Pain and Bruising
During Intervention and post procedure recovery period in clinic, an expected average of 2 hours.
Study Arms (2)
Radiofrequency Ablation
ACTIVE COMPARATORDevice: ClosureFast radiofrequency catheter (VNUS Medical Technologies Inc, San Jose, CA). Patients will have the intervention, ablation of the incompetent small saphenous vein, using this device.
Laser Ablation
ACTIVE COMPARATORDevice: EVLT 980nm diode laser system (Angiodynamics, Queensbury, NY). Patients will have the intervention, ablation of the incompetent small saphenous vein, using this device.
Interventions
For each patient, the Small Saphenous Vein (SSV) will be accessed from the midcalf. After liberal use of tumescent anesthesia, ablation of the incompetent small saphenous vein will be performed. Half the patients will have this procedure performed using the Laser Ablation device and half will be performed using the Radiofrequency Ablation device. They will be randomly assigned to treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with symptomatic chronic venous insufficiency.
- Patients in whom endovenous thermal ablation is clinically indicated.
- Have previously undergone at least 6 weeks of conservative treatment with compression stockings (unless they have venous ulcers, recurrent phlebitis, or bleeding varices).
- Have symptoms secondary to Small Saphenous Vein insufficiency defined as reverse flow in the saphenous vein \>0.5 seconds after calf compression or while standing.
You may not qualify if:
- Have previously undergone surgery, EVTA, or phlebectomy in that extremity (exclusive of spider vein injections or other cosmetic surface procedures).
- Have a history of Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT).
- Have a history of hypercoaguability disorder.
- Are pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Are nonambulatory.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Malcolm Sydnor
- Organization
- Virginia Commonwealth Univeristy
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Malcolm Sydnor, MD
Virginia Commonwealth University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2014
First Posted
September 25, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2008
Primary Completion
March 29, 2017
Study Completion
March 29, 2017
Last Updated
February 7, 2019
Results First Posted
February 7, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-09