NCT02245841

Brief Summary

This study will assess the safety and efficacy of H.P. Acthar gel for treating the cutaneous manifestations in patients with refractory classic dermatomyositis, juvenile dermatomyositis, and amyopathic dermatomyositis. Our hypothesis is that H.P. Acthar gel will be both safe and effective for such patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
19

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2015

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 11, 2014

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 22, 2014

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2015

Completed
6.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 14, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 14, 2021

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 11, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

June 11, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

6.1 years

First QC Date

September 11, 2014

Results QC Date

October 3, 2023

Last Update Submit

June 7, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

dermatomyositisActhar gel

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Dermatomyositis at 6 Months

    Change between baseline at 6 months in modified CDASI-A (Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index) scores at these timepoints. The CDASI-A score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores reflecting more severe disease activity.

    6 months

  • Change in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Visual Acuity Score From Baseline to 6 Months

    Change from baseline to 6 months in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) visual acuity score. Scores range from 0-10 with Higher scores reflecting severe disease activity.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Dermatomyositis at 6 Months.

    6 months

  • Change From Baseline in Patient Global Itch Score of Dermatomyositis at 6 Months

    6 months

  • Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of DLQI Dermatomyositis at 6 Months

    6 months

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Number of Patients With Adverse Effects.

    6 months

  • Number of Patients With Change in Dose of Systemic Corticosteroids and/or Steroid-sparing Immunosuppressive Agents

    6 months

  • Number of Patients With Change in HbA1c

    6 months

Study Arms (1)

H.P Acthar Gel

EXPERIMENTAL

80 U (1 mL) of H.P. Acthar gel via subcutaneous injection twice weekly for 24 weeks

Drug: H.P. Acthar Gel

Interventions

80 U (1 mL) of H.P. Acthar gel via subcutaneous injection twice weekly for 24 weeks

Also known as: Acthar Gel
H.P Acthar Gel

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Must be 18 years of age or older with refractory cutaneous symptoms related to either classic dermatomyositis (CD), juvenile dermatomyositis (JD), or amyopathic dermatomyositis(AD). Diagnosis will be based on either Bohan and Peter criteria (CD and JD) or Sontheimer's criteria (AD)
  • Must have had a skin biopsy with histologic features consistent with dermatomyositis and current cutaneous manifestations consistent with dermatomyositis.
  • Although not mandatory, patients with evidence of current or previous active myositis will be eligible for enrollment. Patients will be considered to have refractory disease if cutaneous manifestations exist despite treatment with steroids and at least one steroid-sparing systemic treatment commonly found to be useful in patients with dermatomyositis. These may include azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, IVIG, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, sirolimus, adalimumab, infliximab and rituximab.
  • Use of topical medications and sunscreen currently and in past will be noted but not weighed for assessment of refractory cutaneous disease.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with dermatomyositis who have minimal-to-no active cutaneous features (focal involvement with less than 1% total body surface area involved or minimal modified CDASI activity score).
  • Patients whose cutaneous findings are not consistent with dermatomyositis and/or have previous biopsy results suggestive of an alternative diagnosis
  • Patients with malignancy-associated dermatomyositis
  • Patients with clear features of an overlap myositis
  • Patients younger than 18 years old
  • Patients with acutely active or chronic infections.
  • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular, hepatic, or renal disease
  • Pregnant or lactating females.
  • Patients with any medical condition that is felt by the primary investigator to place the patient at unreasonable risk for adverse effects during treatment with H.P. Acthar.
  • Hypersensitivity to H.P. Acthar, any of its components (allergy to pig-derived proteins)
  • Patients with osteoporosis
  • Patients who have had surgery within 8 weeks of screening
  • Patients with a history of or current gastric ulcers
  • Patients taking daily doses of systemic corticosteroids greater than the equivalent of 40mg prednisone.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Levine T. Treating refractory dermatomyositis or polymyositis with adrenocorticotropic hormone gel: a retrospective case series. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2012;6:133-9. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S33110. Epub 2012 Jun 11.

    PMID: 22787386BACKGROUND
  • Bohan A, Peter JB. Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (first of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1975 Feb 13;292(7):344-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197502132920706. No abstract available.

    PMID: 1090839BACKGROUND
  • Bohan A, Peter JB. Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (second of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1975 Feb 20;292(8):403-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197502202920807. No abstract available.

    PMID: 1089199BACKGROUND
  • Gerami P, Schope JM, McDonald L, Walling HW, Sontheimer RD. A systematic review of adult-onset clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (dermatomyositis sine myositis): a missing link within the spectrum of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Apr;54(4):597-613. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.10.041. Epub 2006 Jan 23.

    PMID: 16546580BACKGROUND
  • Euwer RL, Sontheimer RD. Amyopathic dermatomyositis: a review. J Invest Dermatol. 1993 Jan;100(1):124S-127S. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12356896.

    PMID: 8423381BACKGROUND
  • Klein RQ, Bangert CA, Costner M, Connolly MK, Tanikawa A, Okawa J, Rose M, Fakharzadeh SS, Fiorentino D, Lee LA, Sontheimer RD, Taylor L, Troxel AB, Werth VP. Comparison of the reliability and validity of outcome instruments for cutaneous dermatomyositis. Br J Dermatol. 2008 Sep;159(4):887-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08711.x. Epub 2008 Jul 4.

    PMID: 18616782BACKGROUND
  • Yassaee M, Fiorentino D, Okawa J, Taylor L, Coley C, Troxel AB, Werth VP. Modification of the cutaneous dermatomyositis disease area and severity index, an outcome instrument. Br J Dermatol. 2010 Mar;162(3):669-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09521.x. Epub 2009 Oct 26.

    PMID: 19863510BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dermatomyositis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PolymyositisMyositisMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesSkin Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Anthony Fernandez, MD, PhD
Organization
Cleveland Clinic

Study Officials

  • Anthony P Fernandez, MD, PhD

    The Cleveland Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Md, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2014

First Posted

September 22, 2014

Study Start

June 15, 2015

Primary Completion

July 14, 2021

Study Completion

July 14, 2021

Last Updated

June 11, 2024

Results First Posted

June 11, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Limited IPD will be shared within the publication.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
CDSAI-A scores and adverse events at each study assessment point will be included and available in the publication indefinitely.
Access Criteria
Available to all.
More information

Locations