NCT02245373

Brief Summary

Major Depression (MD) is highly prevalent and has associated a high burden and economic costs. Mild levels of MD could be treated without antidepressants at Primary Care (PC). Main objectives: 1) To calculate the cost-effectiveness of active monitoring (recommended by NICE) vs pharmacological antidepressant treatment to treat mild MD at PC level. Methods: 300 patients (≥18 years) with MD (diagnosed by the GP) will be recruited at the PC center. Depending on the level of symptoms, the GP will choose between: A) Active Monitoring (n=150) and B) pharmacological treatment (n=150). Patients will be followed-up for one year and data will be collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Severity will be assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), quality of life with the EuroQoL-5D (5 health dimensions), and the use of services with an adapted version of the Client Service Receipt Inventory (including lost productivity). Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis will be calculated and 5000 bootstrapping replications will be conducted to asses uncertainty. Cost-acceptability curves will be done using two perspectives: the National Health Service perspective and the Societal perspective. The Propensity Score technique will minimize the absence of randomization, matching cases from both treatment options.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
263

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2013

Typical duration for all trials

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2013

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 10, 2014

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 19, 2014

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

September 19, 2014

Status Verified

September 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

September 10, 2014

Last Update Submit

September 17, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

DepressionPrimary CareCost-effectivenessPharmacological treatmentWatchful-waiting or Active Monitoring.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Compare the cost-effectiveness of active monitoring (standard treatment without antidepressants) vs antidepressants in mild major depression taking into account the severity and disability in Primary Care. The changes at Time Frame will be assessed.

    Measures: Severity of Depression (PHQ-9), Quality of life (EuroQol) and the use of services (Client Service Receipt Inventory, CSRI).

    At base Line, 6 months and 12 months.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • 1.Quality of life of patients with major depression who initiate treatment in Primary Care.

    At base line, 6 months and 12 months.

  • 2. Cost-utility of an antidepressant vs no treatment in mild Depression in Primary.

    At base line, 6 months and 12 months.

Study Arms (2)

Antidepressants

Naturalistic assignment: Patients whose physician decides to indicate antidepressants.

Drug: Antidepressants

Active Monitoring

Naturalistic assignment: Patients whose physician considers starting an Active Monitoring intervention.

Other: Active Monitoring

Interventions

Antidepressants
Active Monitoring

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Primary care patients who suffer from major depression.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients whose GP considers to have major depression. The indication of pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatment will be based strictly on the clinical judgment of the physician.
  • Adults (≥18 years)
  • Informed consent signed by the physician and the patient to participate in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Alcohol or other toxic abuse.
  • Psychosis or bipolar disorder identified in the psychiatric interview
  • Use in the last 6 months of antipsychotic drugs, lithium or antiepileptic
  • Health status (pregnancy) and / or disease and / or treatments that contraindicate the use of antidepressant drugs.
  • Terminal illness.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Rubio-Valera M, Beneitez I, Penarrubia-Maria MT, Luciano JV, Mendive JM, McCrone P, Knapp M, Sabes-Figuera R, Kocyan K, Garcia-Campayo J, Serrano-Blanco A. Cost-effectiveness of active monitoring versus antidepressants for major depression in primary health care: a 12-month non-randomized controlled trial (INFAP study). BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Mar 31;15:63. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0448-3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depression

Interventions

Antidepressive Agents

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Psychotropic DrugsCentral Nervous System AgentsTherapeutic UsesPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and Uses

Study Officials

  • Antoni Serrano, PhD

    Fundació Sant Joan de Déu

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
12 Months
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2014

First Posted

September 19, 2014

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion

July 1, 2014

Study Completion

July 1, 2015

Last Updated

September 19, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-09