Effect of Adductor Canal Block vs. Placebo on Muscle Strength, Mobilisation and Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of adductor canal block (ACB) vs. placebo on muscle strength, mobility and pain on the first postoperative day after total knee alloplastic (TKA).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Aug 2014
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2014
CompletedDecember 2, 2014
November 1, 2014
3 months
September 12, 2014
November 26, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference between groups in muscle strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle.
Muscle strength is assessed as maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) using a hand-held dynamometer.3 consecutive measurements will be made and the average used. Results for each group will be presented as percentage of baseline values. The primary outcome is the difference in MVIC between the groups.
60 minutes after first ACB (T60)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Difference between groups in muscle strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle.
120 minutes after initial ACB (T120)
VAS pain scores at rest
60 minutes after the initial ACB (T60) and 120 minutes after initial ACB (T120)
VAS pain score during TUG test.
60 minutes after the initial ACB (T60) and 120 minutes after initial ACB (T120
Timed Up and Go(TUG) test
60 minutes after the initial ACB (T60) and 120 minutes after initial ACB (T120
VAS pain scores during 45 degrees active flexion of the knee
60 minutes after the initial ACB (T60) and 120 minutes after initial ACB (T120
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ACB_active/placebo
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive the first ACB with a active drug, 30 ml bolus Ropivacaine 7,5 mg/ml at T0. First outcome measurement are made one hour after the first ACB, prior to their second ACB. At T60 (60 minutes after T0), patients will receive their second ACB with the placebo drug, 30 ml bolus Saline and outcome measures performed again at T120(120 minutes after T0). The measurements for baseline and outcome will be made in following order: VAS pain score at rest - VAS pain score during active flexion of the knee - Muscle strength - TUG test - Highest VAS pain score during TUG test
ACB_placebo/active
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients will receive the first ACB with placebo, 30 ml isotonic saline at T0. First outcome measurement are made one hour after the first ACB, prior to their second ACB. At T60(60 minutes after T0), patients will receive their second ACB with the ropivacaine 7,5 mg/ml 30 ml and outcome measures performed again at T120(120 minutes after T0). The measurements for baseline and outcome will be made in following order: VAS pain score at rest - VAS pain score during active flexion of the knee - Muscle strength - TUG test - Highest VAS pain score during TUG test
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent.
- ASA 1-3
You may not qualify if:
- Non-cooperative patients
- Patients who have already had a peripheral or central block post surgery.
- Patients who are not able to perform a TUG test pre surgery.
- Patients who do not understand or speak Danish.
- Patient who are allergic to the drugs used in this research.
- Patients with alcohol- or drug abuse - determined by investigator.
- Patients with peripheral sensory neuropathy in their lower extremities.
- Pregnant patients.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ulrik Grevstadlead
Study Sites (1)
Gentofte Hospital
Hellerup, 2900, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ulrik Grevstad, MD
Gentofte Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant, MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2014
First Posted
September 17, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
November 1, 2014
Study Completion
November 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 2, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-11