QST-Pupillometry in Sickle Cell Disease Patients
QST
Quantitative Sensory Testing and Pupillometry in Sickle Cell Disease Patients.
1 other identifier
observational
96
1 country
2
Brief Summary
There has been little progress for effective treatment of pain in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients. Many organizations have recognized that understanding the causes and reducing the burden of pain in SCD is critical in order to improve the quality of life in SCD patients. As patients with SCD face the challenge of living with both acute and chronic pain which is often improperly treated, our translational and interdisciplinary project aims to identify objective measures of pain sensitivity and its biochemical and genetic correlates. We hypothesize that SCD patients will have decreased tolerance to thermal and electrical stimuli.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Aug 2013
Longer than P75 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2018
CompletedJanuary 21, 2020
January 1, 2020
5.3 years
September 13, 2013
January 17, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Measuring thermal responsiveness (perception and tolerance) in the outpatient groups.
Using a TSA (thermal sensory analyzer), the patients hot and cold perception and tolerance will be measured in the outpatient groups (high-pain and low-pain frequency and controls).
change between baseline and at 90day follow-up
Measuring thermal responsiveness (perception and tolerance) in the inpatient groups.
Using a TSA thermal sensory analyzer, the patients hot and cold perception and tolerance will be measured in the inpatient groups (pain crisis and pain service).
change over 8 consecutive days
Measure mechanical responsiveness in outpatient groups.
Using the Wagner PPIX 50 Pressure device, patient's tolerance to pressure is assessed in the outpatient groups (high-pain and low-pain frequency and controls).
change between baseline and 90 day follow-up
Measure mechanical responsiveness in inpatient groups.
Using the Wagner PPIX 50 Pressure device, patient's tolerance to pressure is assessed in the inpatient groups (pain crisis and pain service).
change over 8 consecutive days
Measuring the pupil responsiveness in outpatient groups.
Using the Pupillometer device, pupil responses are assessed in the outpatient groups (high-pain and low-pain frequency and controls).
change between baseline and 90 day follow-up
Measuring the pupil responsiveness in inpatient groups.
Using the Pupillometer device, pupil responses are assessed in the inpatient groups (pain service and pain crisis).
change over 8 consecutive days
Measuring electrical sensitivity in outpatient groups.
Using the Neurometer device, to assess electrical sensory perception and tolerance in the outpatient groups (high-pain and low-pain frequency and control).
change between baseline and at 90day follow-up
Measuring electrical sensitivity in inpatient groups.
Using the Neurometer device, to assess electrical sensory perception and tolerance in the outpatient groups (pain service and pain crisis).
change over 8 consecutive days
Study Arms (5)
High frequency pain group
39 pediatric or adult patients with high pain frequency (greater than or equal to 3 ER visits and/or hospitalizations for pain per year over the last two years)
Low Pain Frequency group
39 pediatric or adult patients with low pain frequency (less than or equal to 1 severe pain episode for the last two years)
Healthy control group
39 pediatric or adult relatives of sickle cell disease patients, who do not have the sickle cell trait of SCD.
Pain Crisis group
30 patients with sickle cell disease with severe phenotype (HbSS, HbSβ0 thalassemia, HbSOArab)
Pain Service group
10 patients without sickle cell disease admitted to the pain service.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
SCD patients referred to the Pain Medicine clinic, either outpatient or inpatient.
You may qualify if:
- SCD with severe phenotype (HbSS, HbSbeta0 thalassemia, HbSOArab)
- Relatives of SCD patients who do not have sickle cell trait or SCD; healthy controls
You may not qualify if:
- Completed overt clinical stroke or transient ischemic attack;
- Known severe vasculopathy or Moyamoya disease on brain MRA (Magnetic Resonance Angiography).
- history of having consumed alcohol within the last 12 hours prior to testing.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Julia Finkellead
Study Sites (2)
Children's National Health System
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
Children's National Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
Biospecimen
Collection of blood samples at baseline to be stored in the Pain Neurobiology laboratory for future biochemical studies.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julia Finkel, MD
Children's National Research Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2013
First Posted
September 16, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2013
Primary Completion
November 1, 2018
Study Completion
November 1, 2018
Last Updated
January 21, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01