Study Stopped
The study was terminated early due to difficulty in enrollment and lack of clinical study drug access.
One Year Study of Rifaximin Delayed Release (DR) Tablets in Crohn's Disease
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter, Multiregional, One Year Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Twice Daily Oral Rifaximin Delayed Release Tablets for Induction of Clinical Remission With Endoscopic Response at 16 Weeks Followed by Clinical and Endoscopic Remission at 52 Weeks in Subjects With Active Moderate Crohn's Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
72
Brief Summary
The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of rifaximin DR also referred to as Extended Intestinal Release (EIR) tablets vs. placebo for the induction of clinical remission and endoscopic response following 16 weeks of treatment in participants presenting with active moderate Crohn's disease. A key secondary objective is to evaluate clinical and endoscopic remission following an additional 36 weeks of treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Aug 2014
Typical duration for phase_3
72 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 21, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 16, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 16, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 10, 2019
CompletedSeptember 10, 2019
September 1, 2019
3 years
September 11, 2014
August 15, 2019
September 6, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1) at Week 16
Clinical symptom remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1). CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 2) at Week 16
Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 \[less severe\]-3 \[more severe\]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1 and 2 Both) at Week 16
Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1); and (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 \[less severe\]-3 \[more severe\]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Week 16
Number of Participants With Endoscopic Response Between Week 16 and 17
Endoscopic response defined as a ≥ 3-point decrease in the SES-CD from baseline to the SES-CD score obtained between Week 16 and Week 17. SES-CD scores were calculated from centrally-read digital video of ileocolonoscopies performed at baseline and between Week 16 and Week 17. SES-CD is a validated instrument reflecting an endoscopist's global appraisal of mucosal lesions in Crohn's disease. SES-CD grades lesions by location (5 bowel segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum) using 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, and presence/type of narrowing. The total SES-CD was calculated as the sum of the 4 variables for the 5 bowel segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Baseline, Week 16 to 17
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1) at Week 52
Clinical symptom remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to the Week 52 visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1). CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 2) at Week 52
Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 \[less severe\]-3 \[more severe\]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the 7 days prior to the Week 52 visit. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1 and 2 Both) at Week 52
Clinical Symptom Remission defined by (1) the total number of liquid/very soft stools for the 7 days prior to the Week 52 visit being ≤ 10 (from CDAI Item 1); and (2) an abdominal pain (graded from 0 \[less severe\]-3 \[more severe\]) rating of ≤ 1 (from CDAI Item 2) on each day for the 7 days prior to the Week 52 visit. CDAI score is a weighted, composite index of 8 items (stool frequency, severity of abdominal pain, degree of general well-being, presence or absence of extraintestinal manifestations including fistula, use or non-use of antidiarrheal agents, presence or absence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight). Scores range from 0 to approximately 600 with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.
Week 52
Number of Participants With Endoscopic Response at Week 52
Endoscopic response defined as a ≥ 3-point decrease in the SES-CD from baseline to the SES-CD score obtained at Week 52. SES-CD is a validated instrument reflecting an endoscopist's global appraisal of mucosal lesions in Crohn's disease. SES-CD grades lesions by location (5 bowel segments: ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum) using 4 endoscopic variables: ulcer size, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, and presence/type of narrowing. The total SES-CD was calculated as the sum of the 4 variables for the 5 bowel segments: rectum, left colon, transverse colon, right colon, and ileum. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
Baseline, Week 52
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission (Defined as CDAI Score of <150) at Week 16
Week 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Remission (From CDAI Item 1 and 2 Both) Over Time
From Baseline to Week 52
Number of Participants With SES-CD Score of 0 at Week 52
Week 52
Study Arms (2)
Rifaximin EIR 800 mg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive rifaximin EIR 400 milligrams (mg) tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants will receive placebo matching to rifaximin EIR tablets orally twice daily for 52 weeks.
Interventions
Rifaximin EIR tablets will be administered per the dose and schedule specified in the arm.
Placebo matching to rifaximin EIR tablets will be administered per the dose and schedule specified in the arm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Moderate, non-fistulizing Crohn's disease in the ileum and/or colon prior to randomization; and a SES-CD score of ≥7 (confirmed by centralized endoscopy reading).
- During the screening period, the participant will need to have certain average daily scores for abdominal pain and average number of liquid/very soft stools.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or lactating females. Females of childbearing (reproductive) potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and agree to use a highly effective method(s) of contraception throughout their participation in the study. Diagnosis of ulcerative or indeterminate colitis.
- Diagnosis of Celiac Disease.
- Bowel surgery within 12 weeks prior to screening and/or has surgery planned or deemed likely for Crohn's disease during the study period.
- Presence of an ileostomy or colostomy.
- Known fixed symptomatic stenosis/stricture of the small or large bowel.
- Had more than one segmental colonic resection.
- Had more than 3 small bowel resections or symptoms associated with short bowel syndrome.
- Current evidence of peritonitis.
- History or evidence of colonic mucosal dysplasia.
- History or evidence of adenomatous colonic polyps that have not been removed.
- Unwilling to be tapered off corticosteroids by Week 8 or the participant is known by the Investigator to be steroid-dependent.
- Has used a biologic within 12 weeks of randomization.
- Used cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, or similar drugs within 8 weeks prior to randomization.
- Had rectal administration of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) or corticosteroid enemas/foams/ suppositories within 2 weeks prior to screening visit.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (72)
Unknown Facility
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85260, United States
Unknown Facility
Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States
Unknown Facility
Tucson, Arizona, 85724, United States
Unknown Facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States
Unknown Facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72211, United States
Unknown Facility
North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117, United States
Unknown Facility
Bakersfield, California, 93301, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, 90067, United States
Unknown Facility
Mission Hills, California, 91345, United States
Unknown Facility
Orange, California, 92868, United States
Unknown Facility
San Carlos, California, 94070, United States
Unknown Facility
Torrance, California, 90503, United States
Unknown Facility
Denver, Colorado, 80045, United States
Unknown Facility
Bristol, Connecticut, 06010, United States
Unknown Facility
Danbury, Connecticut, 06810, United States
Unknown Facility
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33426, United States
Unknown Facility
Coral Springs, Florida, 33071, United States
Unknown Facility
Hialeah, Florida, 33012, United States
Unknown Facility
Homestead, Florida, 33030, United States
Unknown Facility
Largo, Florida, 33777, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, 33165, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, 32803, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, 32825, United States
Unknown Facility
Plant City, Florida, 33563, United States
Unknown Facility
Winter Haven, Florida, 33880, United States
Unknown Facility
Winter Park, Florida, 32789, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbus, Georgia, 31909, United States
Unknown Facility
Urbana, Illinois, 61801, United States
Unknown Facility
Evansville, Indiana, 47714, United States
Unknown Facility
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Unknown Facility
Pratt, Kansas, 67124, United States
Unknown Facility
Madisonville, Kentucky, 42431, United States
Unknown Facility
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815, United States
Unknown Facility
Towson, Maryland, 21204, United States
Unknown Facility
Marlborough, Massachusetts, 01752, United States
Unknown Facility
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Unknown Facility
Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047, United States
Unknown Facility
Troy, Michigan, 48098, United States
Unknown Facility
Jackson, Mississippi, 39202, United States
Unknown Facility
Mexico, Missouri, 65265, United States
Unknown Facility
Reno, Nevada, 89511, United States
Unknown Facility
Marlton, New Jersey, 08053, United States
Unknown Facility
Teaneck, New Jersey, 07666, United States
Unknown Facility
Brooklyn, New York, 11235, United States
Unknown Facility
Flushing, New York, 11355, United States
Unknown Facility
Great Neck, New York, 11021, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, 10016, United States
Unknown Facility
Poughkeepsie, New York, 12601, United States
Unknown Facility
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, North Carolina, 28546, United States
Unknown Facility
Kinston, North Carolina, 28501, United States
Unknown Facility
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612, United States
Unknown Facility
Salisbury, North Carolina, 28144, United States
Unknown Facility
Mentor, Ohio, 44060, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Unknown Facility
Sayre, Pennsylvania, 18840, United States
Unknown Facility
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406, United States
Unknown Facility
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615, United States
Unknown Facility
Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29118, United States
Unknown Facility
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57108, United States
Unknown Facility
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, 37211, United States
Unknown Facility
Arlington, Texas, 76012, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104, United States
Unknown Facility
Pasadena, Texas, 77505, United States
Unknown Facility
Southlake, Texas, 76092, United States
Unknown Facility
Clinton, Utah, 84015, United States
Unknown Facility
Leesburg, Virginia, 20176, United States
Unknown Facility
Bellevue, Washington, 98004, United States
Unknown Facility
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705-2281, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was terminated early due to difficulty in enrollment and lack of clinical study drug access. The efficacy results are not considered definitive and are considered for exploratory purposes only.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director of Clinical Operations
- Organization
- Bausch Health Americas, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Lindsey Mathew
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2014
First Posted
September 15, 2014
Study Start
August 21, 2014
Primary Completion
August 16, 2017
Study Completion
August 16, 2017
Last Updated
September 10, 2019
Results First Posted
September 10, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09