NCT02233569

Brief Summary

This is a monocenter randomized controlled trial comparing two systems of mesh and fixation device for the laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with respect to pain. It has been designed as a superiority study to proof the concept of previously published mathematical model of front abdominal wall.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2012

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2012

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2014

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 29, 2014

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 8, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

September 8, 2014

Status Verified

September 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

August 29, 2014

Last Update Submit

September 5, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Laparoscopic hernia repairVentral herniaIncisional herniaIPOM

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Pain

    Presence of pain 7 days after the surgery.

    7 days after the surgery

  • Pain

    Presence of pain 3 months after the surgery.

    3 months after the surgery

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Number of Participants with Recurrences

    up to one year

  • Number of Participants with complications.

    up to one year

  • Pain intensity

    7 days after the surgery

  • Pain intensity

    30 days after the surgery

  • Pain intensity

    3 months after the surgery

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Time of the operation

    intraoperative

Study Arms (2)

PH

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair with the use of Phisiomesh implant and Securestrap fixation device.

Procedure: Intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair with the use of Phisiomesh implant and Securestrap fixation device.Device: ETHICON PHYSIOMESH®

VS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair with the use of Ventralight ST implant with SorbaFix fixation device.

Procedure: Intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair with the use of Ventralight ST implant with SorbaFix fixation device.Device: Ventralight ST implant

Interventions

Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for abdominal wall hernia with the use of specially designed mesh and fixation device systems: Physiomesh (mesh implant) and Securestrap (fixation device)

Also known as: ETHICON PHYSIOMESH® Flexible Composite Mesh, ETHICON SECURESTRAP® Fixation Device
PH

Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for abdominal wall hernia with the use of specially designed mesh and fixation device systems: Ventralight ST (mesh implant) and SofbaFix (fixation device)

Also known as: BARD DAVOL INC., VENTRALIGHT™ ST Mesh, Proven Sepra® Technology in a Low Profile, Lightweight Mesh, ECHO PS™ Positioning System, SORBAFIX™Absorbable Fixation System
VS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed by the patient or his/her legal representative
  • primary or secondary ventral hernia less than 20 cm in length and less than 11 cm in width requiring elective surgical repair
  • recurrence after former abdominal hernia repair WITH MESH
  • recurrence after suture abdominal hernia repair CAN be included

You may not qualify if:

  • no written informed consent
  • patient under 18 years old
  • emergency surgery (incarcerated hernia)
  • patients with expected life time shorter than one year for example due to generalised malignancy
  • BMI exceeding 40.0kg/m²
  • contaminated surgical fields
  • patients on immunosuppression, steroid therapy, constant pain therapy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ceynowa Hospital

Wejherowo, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 84-200, Poland

Location

Related Publications (17)

  • Bansal VK, Misra MC, Kumar S, Rao YK, Singhal P, Goswami A, Guleria S, Arora MK, Chabra A. A prospective randomized study comparing suture mesh fixation versus tacker mesh fixation for laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias. Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1431-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1410-6. Epub 2010 Oct 26.

    PMID: 20976495BACKGROUND
  • Beldi G, Wagner M, Bruegger LE, Kurmann A, Candinas D. Mesh shrinkage and pain in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial comparing suture versus tack mesh fixation. Surg Endosc. 2011 Mar;25(3):749-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1246-0. Epub 2010 Jul 23.

    PMID: 20652715BACKGROUND
  • Bellows CF, Berger DH. Infiltration of suture sites with local anesthesia for management of pain following laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs: a prospective randomized trial. JSLS. 2006 Jul-Sep;10(3):345-50.

    PMID: 17212893BACKGROUND
  • Byrd JF, Agee N, Swan RZ, Lau KN, Heath JJ, Mckillop IH, Sindram D, Martinie JB, Iannitti DA. Evaluation of absorbable and permanent mesh fixation devices: adhesion formation and mechanical strength. Hernia. 2011 Oct;15(5):553-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0826-9. Epub 2011 May 19.

    PMID: 21594698BACKGROUND
  • Carter SA, Hicks SC, Brahmbhatt R, Liang MK. Recurrence and pseudorecurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: predictors and patient-focused outcomes. Am Surg. 2014 Feb;80(2):138-48.

    PMID: 24480213BACKGROUND
  • Chelala E, Debardemaeker Y, Elias B, Charara F, Dessily M, Alle JL. Eighty-five redo surgeries after 733 laparoscopic treatments for ventral and incisional hernia: adhesion and recurrence analysis. Hernia. 2010 Apr;14(2):123-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0637-4. Epub 2010 Feb 14.

    PMID: 20155431BACKGROUND
  • Clarke T, Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Cheng BC, Algra J, Olasky J, Sohn HJ, Moazzez A, Balouch M. Fibrin glue for intraperitoneal laparoscopic mesh fixation: a comparative study in a swine model. Surg Endosc. 2011 Mar;25(3):737-48. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1244-2. Epub 2010 Jul 31.

    PMID: 20680350BACKGROUND
  • Deeken CR, Abdo MS, Frisella MM, Matthews BD. Physicomechanical evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier composite meshes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1541-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1432-0. Epub 2010 Oct 26.

    PMID: 20976479BACKGROUND
  • Deeken CR, Matthews BD. Ventralight ST and SorbaFix versus Physiomesh and Securestrap in a porcine model. JSLS. 2013 Oct-Dec;17(4):549-59. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422520125.

    PMID: 24398196BACKGROUND
  • Eriksen JR, Bech JI, Linnemann D, Rosenberg J. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh fixation with fibrin sealant (Tisseel) vs. titanium tacks: a randomised controlled experimental study in pigs. Hernia. 2008 Oct;12(5):483-91. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0375-z. Epub 2008 May 16.

    PMID: 18483783BACKGROUND
  • Eriksen JR, Poornoroozy P, Jorgensen LN, Jacobsen B, Friis-Andersen HU, Rosenberg J. Pain, quality of life and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia. 2009 Feb;13(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0414-9. Epub 2008 Aug 1.

    PMID: 18670733BACKGROUND
  • Hanna EM, Voeller GR, Roth JS, Scott JR, Gagne DH, Iannitti DA. Evaluation of ECHO PS Positioning System in a Porcine Model of Simulated Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair. ISRN Surg. 2013 May 23;2013:862549. doi: 10.1155/2013/862549. Print 2013.

    PMID: 23762628BACKGROUND
  • Liang MK, Clapp M, Li LT, Berger RL, Hicks SC, Awad S. Patient Satisfaction, chronic pain, and functional status following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. World J Surg. 2013 Mar;37(3):530-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1873-9.

    PMID: 23212794BACKGROUND
  • Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, Dietz UA, Eker HH, El Nakadi I, Hauters P, Hidalgo Pascual M, Hoeferlin A, Klinge U, Montgomery A, Simmermacher RK, Simons MP, Smietanski M, Sommeling C, Tollens T, Vierendeels T, Kingsnorth A. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia. 2009 Aug;13(4):407-14. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x. Epub 2009 Jun 3.

    PMID: 19495920BACKGROUND
  • Smietanski M, Bigda J, Iwan K, Kolodziejczyk M, Krajewski J, Smietanska IA, Gumiela P, Bury K, Bielecki S, Sledzinski Z. Assessment of usefulness exhibited by different tacks in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2007 Jun;21(6):925-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9055-1. Epub 2007 Jan 23.

    PMID: 17242988BACKGROUND
  • Szymczak C, Lubowiecka I, Tomaszewska A, Smietanski M. Investigation of abdomen surface deformation due to life excitation: implications for implant selection and orientation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2012 Feb;27(2):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Sep 15.

    PMID: 21920647BACKGROUND
  • Wassenaar E, Schoenmaeckers E, Raymakers J, van der Palen J, Rakic S. Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques. Surg Endosc. 2010 Jun;24(6):1296-302. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0763-1. Epub 2009 Dec 24.

    PMID: 20033726BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hernia, AbdominalHernia, VentralIncisional Hernia

Interventions

Wound Healing

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HerniaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic Processes

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RegenerationBiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Maciej Pawlak, MD

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Maciej Śmietański, PhD

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2014

First Posted

September 8, 2014

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion

February 1, 2014

Study Completion

February 1, 2014

Last Updated

September 8, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-09

Locations