Visual Feedback of CPR: Does Point of View Matter?
Providing Visual Feedback of Quality of CPR During Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: Does Point of View Matter?
1 other identifier
interventional
125
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators will look at how accurate pediatric healthcare workers are at judging quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, by observation of the chest compressions, and if they are more accurate at a certain position near the patient. The investigators will do this by having participants fill out a survey about the quality of the Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in several recorded resuscitation scenarios.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 4, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedAugust 5, 2015
August 1, 2015
3 months
August 22, 2014
August 4, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of healthcare providers who are accurate in their visual assessment of CPR quality.
Data is anticipated to be presented 4 months after it is collected.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Proportion of healthcare practitioners who accurately report CPR quality from position in relation to the patient (head, side and foot of bed).
Data is anticipated to be presented 4 months after data is collected.
Proportion of healthcare practitioners accurately identifying CPR errors (rate, depth, recoil).
Data is anticipated to be presented about 4 months after it is collected.
Study Arms (1)
Pediatric Acute Care Professionals
EXPERIMENTALIndividuals must work in ER or ICU setting regularly or rotate through this setting with up to date BLS/PALS/ACLS certification. The participants will be required to rate the CPR based on accuracy for each video shown. The type of CPR error(s) shown to the individuals will be randomized.
Interventions
Participants will be randomly assigned 12 videos to watch and rate the CPR quality of each. Investigators will be blind to the identity of the participants.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pediatric acute care healthcare providers: such as nurses, nurse practitioners, respiratory therapists, physicians, residents, fellows
- Those who work in ER or ICU setting regularly or rotate through this setting
- Basic Life Support (BLS), Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) or Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) certification within the past two years
You may not qualify if:
- Anyone who has participated previously in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
KidSim-Aspire Simulation Research Lab, Alberta Children's Hospital
Calgary, Alberta, T3B6A8, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Sutton R, Niles D, Nysaether J et al. Quantitative Analysis of CPR quality during in-hospital resuscitation of older children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2009; 124 : 1930-8. Sutton R, Maltese M, Niles D et al. Quantitative analysis of chest compression interruption during in-hospital resuscitation of older children and adolescents. Resuscitation 2009; 80:1259-1263. Atkins DL et al. Epidemiology and Outcomes From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Children: The Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry-Cardiac Arrest. Circulation. 2009;119:1484-91. Atkins DL, Everson-Stewart S, Sears GK, Daya M, Osmond MH, Warden CR, Berg RA. Epidemiology and outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in children: the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry-Cardiac Arrest. Circulation. 2009;119:1484-1491.
BACKGROUNDJones A, Lin Y, Nettel-Aguirre A, Gilfoyle E, Cheng A. Visual assessment of CPR quality during pediatric cardiac arrest: does point of view matter? Resuscitation. 2015 May;90:50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.01.036. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
PMID: 25727057DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adam Cheng, MD, FRCPC
University of Calgary
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- KidSim Aspire Coordinator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2014
First Posted
September 4, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 5, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08