A Study to Compare the Adhesiveness of 2 Different Rotigotine Patches Used for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, 2-way Cross-over Study to Compare the Adhesiveness of 2 Different Rotigotine Patch Formulations in Subjects With Parkinson's Disease
2 other identifiers
interventional
57
1 country
11
Brief Summary
The primary objective of the study is to compare the adhesiveness of 2 different patch formulations of Rotigotine using the largest patch size of 40 cm\^2, under the assumption that both patch formulations show similar adhesiveness properties.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Sep 2014
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 3, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 2, 2015
CompletedNovember 2, 2015
October 1, 2015
2 months
August 29, 2014
August 11, 2015
October 1, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Average Adhesiveness Score of 2 Days of 24 Hours Patch Application as Rated by the Investigator (or Designee) Assessed According to the EMA Draft Guideline
The assessment was performed according to the adhesion score adapted from the EMA draft guideline on quality of transdermal patches (EMA/CHMMP/QWP/911254/2011, 2012). * 0 = \> 95 - 100 % of the patch area adheres * 1 = \> 90 - 95 % of the patch adheres * 2 = \> 85 - 90 % of the patch adheres * 3 = \> 80 - 85 % of the patch adheres * 4 = \> 75 - 80 % of the patch adheres * 5 = \> 70 - 75 % of the patch adheres * 6 = ≥ 50 - 70 % of the patch adheres * 7 = \< 50 % of the patch adheres * 8 = Patch completely detached The recorded scores 6, 7, and 8 were combined in order to create a cumulative group "less than or equal to 70 % adhered or patch detachment" which was regarded as significant patch adhesion failure in the draft EMA guideline. The average of patches 1 and 2 is presented by Treatment Arm below.
Patch adhesiveness was measured after 24 hours (±1 hour) after previous patch application on Day 2, 3, 4 and 5
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Patch Adhesiveness Per Day as Rated by the Investigator or Designee 24 Hours After Patch Application According to the EMA Draft Guideline for Patch 1
Patch adhesiveness was measured 24 hours (±1 hour) after previous patch application on Day 2 and 4
Patch Adhesiveness Per Day as Rated by the Investigator 24 Hours After Patch Application According to the EMA Draft Guideline for Patch 2
Patch adhesiveness was measured 24 hours (±1 hour) after previous patch application on Day 3 and 5
Patch Adhesiveness Per Day as Rated by the Investigator 24 Hours After Patch Application According to the FDA/Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Score for Patch 1
Patch adhesiveness was measured 24 hours (±1 hour) after previous patch application on Day 2 and 4
Patch Adhesiveness Per Day as Rated by the Investigator 24 Hours After Patch Application According to the FDA/Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Score for Patch 2
Patch adhesiveness was measured 24 hours (±1 hour) after previous patch application on Day 3 and 5
Patch Adhesiveness Per Day as Rated by the Subject 24 Hours After Patch Application for Patch 1
Patch adhesiveness was measured 24 hours (±1 hour) after previous patch application on Day 2 and 4
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Treatment Arm A-B
EXPERIMENTAL4 day treatment (Treatment A: Rotigotine transdermal patch 8 mg/24 hours, test product PR 2.3.1 followed by Treatment B: Rotigotine transdermal patch 8 mg/24 hours reference product PR 2.1.1)
Treatment Arm B-A
EXPERIMENTAL4 day treatment (Treatment B: Rotigotine transdermal patch 8 mg/24 hours reference product PR 2.1.1 followed by Treatment A: Rotigotine transdermal patch 8 mg/24 hours, test product PR 2.3.1)
Interventions
* Pharmaceutical form: Transdermal patch * Concentration: 8 mg/24 hours * Route of administration: Transdermal
* Pharmaceutical form: Transdermal patch * Concentration: 8 mg/24 hours * Route of administration: Transdermal
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject has a diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's Disease
- Subject has been on continuous treatment with commercially available Rotigotine transdermal patches (Neupro®) for at least 3 months prior to enrollment
- Subject has been taking a stable Rotigotine dose including an 8 mg/24 hours (40 cm\^2) patch for at least 2 weeks prior to enrollment
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has any medical or psychiatric condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, could jeopardize or would compromise the subject's well-being or ability to participate in this study
- Subject has a history of significant skin hypersensitivity to adhesives or other transdermal products or recently unsolved contact dermatitis
- Subject has a history or present condition of an atopic or eczematous Dermatitis, Psoriasis, or an active skin disease
- Subject has a lifetime history of suicide attempt (including an active attempt, interrupted attempt, or aborted attempt), or has suicidal ideation in the past 6 months as indicated by a positive response ('yes') to either Question 4 or Question 5 of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Screening (Visit 1) or Baseline (Visit 2)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbHlead
- Pharmaceutical Health Sciencescollaborator
- Bracket Globalcollaborator
Study Sites (11)
104
Alzenau in Unterfranken, Germany
106
Aschaffenburg, Germany
105
Berlin, Germany
107
Böblingen, Germany
101
Cologne, Germany
111
Düsseldorf, Germany
109
Erbach im Odenwald, Germany
110
Essen, Germany
102
Karlstadt am Main, Germany
103
Stuttgart, Germany
108
Würzburg, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Elshoff JP, Bauer L, Goldammer N, Oortgiesen M, Pesch H, Timmermann L. Randomized, double-blind, crossover study of the adhesiveness of two formulations of rotigotine transdermal patch in patients with Parkinson's disease. Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Jul;34(7):1293-1299. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1430559. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
PMID: 29461870DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- UCB (Study Director)
- Organization
- UCB Clinical Trial Call Center
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
UCB Clinical Trial Call Center
UCB Pharma
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2014
First Posted
September 3, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion
November 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 2, 2015
Results First Posted
November 2, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10