NCT02230904

Brief Summary

The primary objective of the study is to compare the adhesiveness of 2 different patch formulations of Rotigotine using the largest patch size of 40 cm\^2, under the assumption that both patch formulations show similar adhesiveness properties.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
57

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2014

Shorter than P25 for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

11 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 29, 2014

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 3, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2014

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2014

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 2, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

November 2, 2015

Status Verified

October 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

August 29, 2014

Results QC Date

August 11, 2015

Last Update Submit

October 1, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Rotigotine patchNeuproParkinson's Disease

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Average Adhesiveness Score of 2 Days of 24 Hours Patch Application as Rated by the Investigator (or Designee) Assessed According to the EMA Draft Guideline

    The assessment was performed according to the adhesion score adapted from the EMA draft guideline on quality of transdermal patches (EMA/CHMMP/QWP/911254/2011, 2012). * 0 = \> 95 - 100 % of the patch area adheres * 1 = \> 90 - 95 % of the patch adheres * 2 = \> 85 - 90 % of the patch adheres * 3 = \> 80 - 85 % of the patch adheres * 4 = \> 75 - 80 % of the patch adheres * 5 = \> 70 - 75 % of the patch adheres * 6 = ≥ 50 - 70 % of the patch adheres * 7 = \< 50 % of the patch adheres * 8 = Patch completely detached The recorded scores 6, 7, and 8 were combined in order to create a cumulative group "less than or equal to 70 % adhered or patch detachment" which was regarded as significant patch adhesion failure in the draft EMA guideline. The average of patches 1 and 2 is presented by Treatment Arm below.

    Patch adhesiveness was measured after 24 hours (±1 hour) after previous patch application on Day 2, 3, 4 and 5

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Patch Adhesiveness Per Day as Rated by the Investigator or Designee 24 Hours After Patch Application According to the EMA Draft Guideline for Patch 1

    Patch adhesiveness was measured 24 hours (±1 hour) after previous patch application on Day 2 and 4

  • Patch Adhesiveness Per Day as Rated by the Investigator 24 Hours After Patch Application According to the EMA Draft Guideline for Patch 2

    Patch adhesiveness was measured 24 hours (±1 hour) after previous patch application on Day 3 and 5

  • Patch Adhesiveness Per Day as Rated by the Investigator 24 Hours After Patch Application According to the FDA/Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Score for Patch 1

    Patch adhesiveness was measured 24 hours (±1 hour) after previous patch application on Day 2 and 4

  • Patch Adhesiveness Per Day as Rated by the Investigator 24 Hours After Patch Application According to the FDA/Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Score for Patch 2

    Patch adhesiveness was measured 24 hours (±1 hour) after previous patch application on Day 3 and 5

  • Patch Adhesiveness Per Day as Rated by the Subject 24 Hours After Patch Application for Patch 1

    Patch adhesiveness was measured 24 hours (±1 hour) after previous patch application on Day 2 and 4

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Treatment Arm A-B

EXPERIMENTAL

4 day treatment (Treatment A: Rotigotine transdermal patch 8 mg/24 hours, test product PR 2.3.1 followed by Treatment B: Rotigotine transdermal patch 8 mg/24 hours reference product PR 2.1.1)

Drug: Rotigotine (Test product PR 2.3.1)Drug: Rotigotine (Reference product PR 2.1.1)

Treatment Arm B-A

EXPERIMENTAL

4 day treatment (Treatment B: Rotigotine transdermal patch 8 mg/24 hours reference product PR 2.1.1 followed by Treatment A: Rotigotine transdermal patch 8 mg/24 hours, test product PR 2.3.1)

Drug: Rotigotine (Test product PR 2.3.1)Drug: Rotigotine (Reference product PR 2.1.1)

Interventions

* Pharmaceutical form: Transdermal patch * Concentration: 8 mg/24 hours * Route of administration: Transdermal

Treatment Arm A-BTreatment Arm B-A

* Pharmaceutical form: Transdermal patch * Concentration: 8 mg/24 hours * Route of administration: Transdermal

Also known as: Neupro
Treatment Arm A-BTreatment Arm B-A

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject has a diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's Disease
  • Subject has been on continuous treatment with commercially available Rotigotine transdermal patches (Neupro®) for at least 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Subject has been taking a stable Rotigotine dose including an 8 mg/24 hours (40 cm\^2) patch for at least 2 weeks prior to enrollment

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject has any medical or psychiatric condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, could jeopardize or would compromise the subject's well-being or ability to participate in this study
  • Subject has a history of significant skin hypersensitivity to adhesives or other transdermal products or recently unsolved contact dermatitis
  • Subject has a history or present condition of an atopic or eczematous Dermatitis, Psoriasis, or an active skin disease
  • Subject has a lifetime history of suicide attempt (including an active attempt, interrupted attempt, or aborted attempt), or has suicidal ideation in the past 6 months as indicated by a positive response ('yes') to either Question 4 or Question 5 of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Screening (Visit 1) or Baseline (Visit 2)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (11)

104

Alzenau in Unterfranken, Germany

Location

106

Aschaffenburg, Germany

Location

105

Berlin, Germany

Location

107

Böblingen, Germany

Location

101

Cologne, Germany

Location

111

Düsseldorf, Germany

Location

109

Erbach im Odenwald, Germany

Location

110

Essen, Germany

Location

102

Karlstadt am Main, Germany

Location

103

Stuttgart, Germany

Location

108

Würzburg, Germany

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Elshoff JP, Bauer L, Goldammer N, Oortgiesen M, Pesch H, Timmermann L. Randomized, double-blind, crossover study of the adhesiveness of two formulations of rotigotine transdermal patch in patients with Parkinson's disease. Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Jul;34(7):1293-1299. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1430559. Epub 2018 Feb 20.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Interventions

rotigotine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Parkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesNeurodegenerative Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
UCB (Study Director)
Organization
UCB Clinical Trial Call Center

Study Officials

  • UCB Clinical Trial Call Center

    UCB Pharma

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2014

First Posted

September 3, 2014

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion

November 1, 2014

Study Completion

December 1, 2014

Last Updated

November 2, 2015

Results First Posted

November 2, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-10

Locations