Gingival Recession Coverage With and Without Emdogain
Effect of Emdogain on Wound Healing After Gingival Recession Coverage Using Connective Tissue Graft: A Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Enamel matrix proteins have been shown to play a crucial role during tooth development and its supporting tissues. This is used in periodontal surgery where regeneration of lost tissues around the teeth is intended. Emdogain, a product of Straumann Institute contains these matrix proteins and has been successfully used in regenerative periodontal surgery for more than 16 years. The treatment of gum recession is a common requirement, more and more patients are seeking treatment at the investigators' clinic due to aesthetic concern, root sensitivity and difficulties in performing adequate oral hygiene. The standard treatment comprises the transplantation of a piece of connective tissue from the palate to the denuded root surface. In many cases Emdogain is additionally applied to enhance healing. So far the effect of Emdogain on the early wound healing process after surgical root coverage has not been investigated. The purpose of the investigators' study is to compare early wound healing parameters between treatment with and without Emdogain. For this study 40 patients undergoing root coverage surgery at the investigators' department will be included. Early wound healing features between the two groups will be described and compared. Furthermore, inflammatory markers typical for early healing will be evaluated together with patients'subjective postoperative comfort. Finally, outcomes 6 months after the treatment will be assessed. The investigators' hypothesis is that Emdogain treatment enhances wound healing and decreases post-operative complication rates.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Aug 2014
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 3, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 22, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 14, 2017
CompletedApril 20, 2017
April 1, 2017
1.7 years
August 12, 2014
April 19, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline in wound healing
Progress in wound healing assessed by the "early wound healing index (EHI)" previously defined by Wachtel et al.
2, 7 and 14 days after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Levels of post-procedural inflammatory markers
2 and 7 days after surgery
Improvement of patients' post-operative comfort
2 days to 2 weeks after surgery
Root coverage
6 months after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Recession coverage without Emdogain
ACTIVE COMPARATORRecession coverage with Emdogain
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
In the control group subjects the recession coverage surgery will be performed without Emdogain.
In the test group subjects the recession coverage surgery will be performed with Emdogain.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Gingival recession Miller class I and II
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a history of a chronic infectious or inflammatory diseases (i.e. rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematodes, Crohn's disease, or HIV-, HCV-infection etc.
- Patients with any clinical signs of an acute infection
- Patients with renal failure (GFR \< 30ml/min)
- Smoking \> 5 cigarettes per day
- Patients \< 18 years of age
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Periodontology, University of Bern
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
Related Publications (8)
Grandin HM, Gemperli AC, Dard M. Enamel matrix derivative: a review of cellular effects in vitro and a model of molecular arrangement and functioning. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2012 Jun;18(3):181-202. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2011.0365. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
PMID: 22070552BACKGROUNDSpahr A, Haegewald S, Tsoulfidou F, Rompola E, Heijl L, Bernimoulin JP, Ring C, Sander S, Haller B. Coverage of Miller class I and II recession defects using enamel matrix proteins versus coronally advanced flap technique: a 2-year report. J Periodontol. 2005 Nov;76(11):1871-80. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.11.1871.
PMID: 16274306BACKGROUNDWachtel H, Schenk G, Bohm S, Weng D, Zuhr O, Hurzeler MB. Microsurgical access flap and enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Jun;30(6):496-504. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00013.x.
PMID: 12795787BACKGROUNDCairo F, Pagliaro U, Nieri M. Treatment of gingival recession with coronally advanced flap procedures: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):136-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01267.x.
PMID: 18724847BACKGROUNDHenriques PS, Pelegrine AA, Nogueira AA, Borghi MM. Application of subepithelial connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a split-mouth randomized study. J Oral Sci. 2010 Sep;52(3):463-71. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.52.463.
PMID: 20881341RESULTCueva MA, Boltchi FE, Hallmon WW, Nunn ME, Rivera-Hidalgo F, Rees T. A comparative study of coronally advanced flaps with and without the addition of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of marginal tissue recession. J Periodontol. 2004 Jul;75(7):949-56. doi: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.7.949.
PMID: 15341352RESULTAroca S, Molnar B, Windisch P, Gera I, Salvi GE, Nikolidakis D, Sculean A. Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jul;40(7):713-20. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12112. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
PMID: 23627374RESULTRasperini G, Roccuzzo M, Francetti L, Acunzo R, Consonni D, Silvestri M. Subepithelial connective tissue graft for treatment of gingival recessions with and without enamel matrix derivative: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Apr;31(2):133-9.
PMID: 21491012RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anton Sculean, Prof. Dr. med. dent.
Department of Periodontology, University of Bern
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2014
First Posted
September 3, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
April 22, 2016
Study Completion
February 14, 2017
Last Updated
April 20, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04