NCT02224508

Brief Summary

Background: Sixty million American adults suffer from moderate to severe chronic pain. Of these, 5 to 8 million currently use opioids long-term. With increased opioid prescribing for chronic pain, an epidemic of prescription opioid addiction and overdose has arisen. This necessitates action to stem opioid-related morbidity and mortality. Group Health (GH), a large nonprofit health plan, developed and implemented opioid risk reduction strategies for doctors and patients in some, but not all, of its clinics. The risk reduction initiative achieved large opioid dose reductions, near universal documentation of care plans, and marked increases in patient monitoring. Rigorous evaluation of patient outcomes resulting from the opioid risk reduction initiative, incorporating patient perspectives, is needed to guide health care improvement efforts to reduce opioid risks regionally and nationally. Research goal: The investigators will evaluate a major health plan initiative to reduce risks of long-term opioid use for chronic pain. Starting in 2008, some GH clinics reduced prescribing of high opioid doses. In 2010 the same clinics increased care planning and monitoring of chronic opioid therapy (COT) patients. Our research goal is to evaluate effects of this initiative on health and safety outcomes of COT patients. We will test whether the initiative influenced pain outcomes; patient-reported opioid benefits and problems; and opioid-related adverse events. Design and Outcomes: The investigators will assess effects of GH's opioid risk reduction initiative among COT patients using opioids long-term. The investigators will compare COT patients from clinics that implemented the initiative with COT patients from care settings that did not implement the initiative. The investigators will use survey data to assess patient-reported outcomes including pain severity, depressive symptoms, and patient perceptions of opioid benefits and problems, including validated measures of prescription opioid use disorder. They will interview and compare 800 COT patients using opioids long-term from clinics that implemented the risk reduction initiative and 800 COT patients from care settings that did not. Impact: This research will provide an urgently needed, rigorous evaluation of a major risk reduction initiative among COT patients. Evaluation results will guide efforts of health plans, clinicians and patients nationwide to ensure safe, effective and compassionate chronic pain care.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,588

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2014

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 15, 2014

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 25, 2014

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2014

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2016

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 5, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

November 13, 2017

Status Verified

October 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

August 15, 2014

Results QC Date

February 2, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 11, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion With Prescription Opioid Use Disorder (Defined by DSM5 Criteria).

    Proportion with Prescription Opioid Use Disorder, which is defined by multiple indicators of opioid abuse and addiction from 9 criteria in the DSM5 manual of the American Psychiatric Association. In this research, it will be assessed using the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM5, Columbia University). Estimates were weighted to account for non-response, with weights based on baseline patient characteristics assessed with electronic health care data available for all chronic opioid therapy patients sampled for the survey. The number analyzed differs from the Participant Flow module due to persons with missing item data who were dropped from this analysis. The numbers with missing items were deemed too few to justify item imputation.

    1 year prior to interview

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Pain Severity (Intensity, Interference With Activities, Enjoyment): PEG Scale

    1 week prior to interview

  • Depressive Symptoms

    2 weeks prior to interview

Study Arms (2)

Opioid Risk Reduction Initiative

Opioid risk reduction initiative for chronic opioid therapy patients implemented in Group Health integrated group practice clinics.

Usual Care

Usual care for management of chronic opioid therapy patients implemented in Group Health network care settings.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

The study population is prevalent Chronic Opioid Therapy (COT) patients from Group Health clinics. Our initial goals was to interview and compare 800 COT patients using opioids long-term from clinics that implemented the risk reduction initiative and 800 COT patients from care settings that did not. sample size targets were revised to enroll 950 COT patients from the clinics that implemented the risk reduction initiatives and 650 from the clinics that did not implement the risk reduction initiatives.

You may qualify if:

  • Enrolled for at least one year prior to sampling for survey
  • Received 70+ days supply of opioids in 2 of 4 quarters, including the most recent 90 days
  • Received 45+ days supply of opioids in the other 2 quarters

You may not qualify if:

  • Received cancer diagnoses, other than non-melanoma skin cancer, at least twice in the prior year
  • Received any skilled nursing facility care in the prior year
  • Received any hospice care or
  • Received any opioids from an oncologist

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Substance-Related DisordersPainDepressive Disorder

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Chemically-Induced DisordersMental DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMood Disorders

Limitations and Caveats

This phase of the evaluation reports after-only survey data comparing prevalent chronic opioid therapy patients who had been exposed or not exposed to the health plan opioid risk reduction initiatives for at least one year.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Michael Von Korff, ScD
Organization
Group Health Research Institute

Study Officials

  • Michael R VonKorff, ScD

    Group Health Research Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2014

First Posted

August 25, 2014

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion

January 1, 2016

Study Completion

January 1, 2016

Last Updated

November 13, 2017

Results First Posted

May 5, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

A complete, cleaned, de-identified copy of the final dataset used in conducting the final analyses will be made available to other qualified researchers within nine months of the end of the final year of funding upon approval by the Group Health Human Subject's Review Committee. Given the complexity of the final dataset, our expectation would be that other researchers using the data would require technical assistance from our research team to understand the data and to employ appropriate methods of data analysis. Or, other researchers may prefer to have us analyze the study data to produce analyses according to their specifications. Since use of the dataset by other investigators, or analyses carried out by us for other researchers, would occur after the grant award period has ended, we will expect necessary funding of technical support, data transfers and/or data analyses to be obtained by the research team requesting access to the final dataset.