Bacterial Resistance in Patients Receiving Post-Intravitreal Injection Antibiotics
Conjunctival Floral Resistance in a Single Practice Site Comparing Povidone- Iodine Prep With or Without Post-Intravitreal Injection Second Generation Fluoroquinolones.
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
- 1.Background: Over 1 million intravitreal injections are performed annually in the United States. The most devastating complication related to these injections is endophthalmitis, with an incidence of 0.02 - 0.1% per injection. Techniques aimed at prevention of this complication have been studied, though emergence rates of antibiotic resistant bacteria in a single clinic population comparing antiseptic technique with iodine vs. use of post-injection second generation fluoroquinolones has not been reported in the literature.
- 2.Objectives: The purpose of the study is to help determine the best way to prevent infection and limit antibiotic resistance in patients receiving eye injections.
- 3.Procedures Involved (Research Interventions): After the patient is chosen based on inclusion criteria and agrees to participate in the study, exclusion criteria will be reviewed, cognizance will be determined, informed consent and HIPAA compliance forms will be signed. At this point and prior to the instillation of ophthalmic medications, a Rayon swab will be passed along the inferior fornix of the study eye while the patient looks up and the examiner lowers the lower eyelid. The swab will then be used to inoculate chocolate agar and a blood agar culture plates and a glass slide. These will be brought to the FMO microbiology department for culture and Gram stain. All Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative Staphylococcus species identified will be subjected to sensitivity testing using the Gram Positive antibiotic panel available at Loma Linda, with the addition of ciprofloxacin.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 7, 2017
CompletedNovember 7, 2017
October 1, 2017
1.6 years
July 28, 2014
August 6, 2017
October 29, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Resistance of Ocular Flora to Commonly Used Post-injection Prophylactic Antibiotics
Resistance of all coagulase negative staph and staph aureus species to a panel of commonly used antibiotics will be determined and compared between groups. Resistance will be measured using minimum inhibitory concentrations which will be tested on the Siemens MicroScan instrument by doubling broth dilutions. Antibiotic susceptibility interpretations using the categories "S" for susceptible, "I" for Intermediate and "R" for Resistance based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Ciprofloxacin will be tested using the Biomerieux "E test" strip. The test directly quantifies antimicrobial susceptibility in terms of discrete MIC values on a continuous gradient strip. The MIC values are also based on the CLSI guidelines giving interpretations of "S", "I" or "R". For information on other antibiotics to be tested, please contact the investigator or provide more characters for input.
Cultured organisms will be subjected to resistance panels once they have grown and been identified. Cultures will be followed for 7 days total, and if no growth is recorded at that time they will be considered sterile.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Average Number of Antibiotics to Which Isolated Organisms Were Resistant
Through study completion, average of 4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Ciprofloxacin
ACTIVE COMPARATORCiprofloxacin: Patients with choroidal neovascularization due to wet age-related macular degeneration or any other cause, clinically significant macular edema or cystoid macular edema over age 18 who have been treated with at least 3 monthly intravitreal injections of an anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (anti-VEGF) agent in the last 6 months. These patients must have been instructed to use post-injection topical ciprofloxacin 0.3% 4x daily for 3 days. On the visit of their next injection, a conjunctival swab will be taken in the inferior fornix prior to instillation of any ophthalmic drops.
Standard Aseptic Technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard Aseptic Technique: Patients with choroidal neovascularization due to wet age-related macular degeneration or any other cause, clinically significant macular edema or cystoid macular edema over age 18 who have been treated with at least 3 monthly intravitreal injections of an anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (anti-VEGF) agent in the last 6 months. These injections must have been given with povidone-iodine only applied to the injection site and conjunctival fornix prior to injection, but no post-injection antibiotics were given. On the visit of their next injection, a conjunctival swab will be taken in the inferior fornix prior to instillation of any ophthalmic drops.
Interventions
Use of topical ciprofloxacin 4x daily for 3 days after intravitreal injection using standard aseptic techniques with Povidone-Iodine is a common practice intervention in the United States, and is thought by some to reduce the risk of post-injection endophthalmitis.
Patients in this group will have received Povidone-Iodine Only following injections of anti-VEGF agents at least 3 times in the last 6 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with choroidal neovascularization due to wet age-related macular degeneration or any other cause, clinically significant macular edema or cystoid macular edema over age 18 who have been treated with at least 3 monthly intravitreal injections of an anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (anti-VEGF) agent in the last 6 months. These injections must have been given in either Dr. Fan's clinic using povidone-iodine and post-injection topical ciprofloxacin 0.3% 4x daily for 3 days, or in Dr. Rauser's clinic where povidone-iodine only is applied to the injection site and conjunctival fornix but no post-injection antibiotics are given.
You may not qualify if:
- Administration of anti-VEGF agents outside of Dr. Fan's or Dr. Rauser's clinics
- Intraocular surgery
- Use of topical antibiotics other than ciprofloxacin 0.3%
- Infections of the eye or ocular adnexa within the last 3 months
- Use of oral antibiotics within the last 30 days
- Contact lens wear.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Loma Linda University of Health Sciences Faculty Medical Offices
Loma Linda, California, 92354, United States
Related Publications (9)
McCannel CA. Meta-analysis of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents: causative organisms and possible prevention strategies. Retina. 2011 Apr;31(4):654-61. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31820a67e4.
PMID: 21330939BACKGROUNDMoshfeghi AA, Rosenfeld PJ, Flynn HW Jr, Schwartz SG, Davis JL, Murray TG, Smiddy WE, Berrocal AM, Dubovy SR, Lee WH, Albini TA, Lalwani GA, Kovach JL, Puliafito CA. Endophthalmitis after intravitreal vascular [corrected] endothelial growth factor antagonists: a six-year experience at a university referral center. Retina. 2011 Apr;31(4):662-8. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31821067c4.
PMID: 21836400BACKGROUNDKim SJ, Toma HS. Ophthalmic antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance a randomized, controlled study of patients undergoing intravitreal injections. Ophthalmology. 2011 Jul;118(7):1358-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.014. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
PMID: 21420176BACKGROUNDKim SJ, Toma HS. Antimicrobial resistance and ophthalmic antibiotics: 1-year results of a longitudinal controlled study of patients undergoing intravitreal injections. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Sep;129(9):1180-8. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.213.
PMID: 21911665BACKGROUNDMino De Kaspar H, Hoepfner AS, Engelbert M, Thiel M, Ta CN, Mette M, Schulze-Schwering M, Grasbon T, Sesma-Vea B, Casas JM, Iturralde-Goni R, Klauss V, Kampik A. Antibiotic resistance pattern and visual outcome in experimentally-induced Staphylococcus epidermidis endophthalmitis in a rabbit model. Ophthalmology. 2001 Mar;108(3):470-8. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00545-5.
PMID: 11237900BACKGROUNDMiller D, Flynn PM, Scott IU, Alfonso EC, Flynn HW Jr. In vitro fluoroquinolone resistance in staphylococcal endophthalmitis isolates. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Apr;124(4):479-83. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.4.479.
PMID: 16606872BACKGROUNDGreen-Simms AE, Ekdawi NS, Bakri SJ. Survey of intravitreal injection techniques among retinal specialists in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Feb;151(2):329-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.08.039. Epub 2010 Dec 18.
PMID: 21168821BACKGROUNDBhatt SS, Stepien KE, Joshi K. Prophylactic antibiotic use after intravitreal injection: effect on endophthalmitis rate. Retina. 2011 Nov;31(10):2032-6. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31820f4b4f.
PMID: 21659941BACKGROUNDCheung CS, Wong AW, Lui A, Kertes PJ, Devenyi RG, Lam WC. Incidence of endophthalmitis and use of antibiotic prophylaxis after intravitreal injections. Ophthalmology. 2012 Aug;119(8):1609-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.014. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
PMID: 22480743BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. David Sierpina
- Organization
- Loma Linda University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Rauser, MD
Loma Linda University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2014
First Posted
August 22, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
May 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 7, 2017
Results First Posted
November 7, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10