Composite Resins Reconditioned, Behavior and Survival: Clinical Follow-up 10 Years
reacondcomp
1 other identifier
observational
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of resin composite restorations refurbished and compare with 2 groups of resins, 1 without treatment and another replaced resins acted as controls. The null hypothesis of this study is that the group of refurbished resins have a similar behavior to the control groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started May 2003
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 21, 2014
CompletedAugust 21, 2014
August 1, 2014
10.6 years
August 19, 2014
August 20, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in quality of restorations
The quality of the restorations was scored according to the modified USPHS criteria. Two examiners underwent calibration exercises each year (JM and EF). Immediately after the treatment (baseline) and 10 years later, the examiners assessed the restorations independently by direct visual and tactile examination with mouth mirror number 5 and explorer number 23 (Hu Friedy Mfg. Co. Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and indirectly by radiographic examination (bite wing). The four parameters examined were anatomic form, secondary caries, marginal staining and marginal adaptation. If the difference was recorded between the two examiners, and if they could not reach an agreement, a third clinician, who also underwent the calibration exercises (GM), made the final decision.
1 year
Study Arms (3)
Replacement
Composite resins with Alpha values for the marginal adaptation criteria were used as the positive control and were made with resin composite (Filtek Supreme, 3M ESPE), eith rubber dam isolation and the adhesive system L-Pop Prompt (3M-ESPE)
No treatment
Composite resin restorations (Z100, 3M ESPE) in general clinically acceptable, did not receive treatment.
Refurbishing
For this group, The dentists finished the occlusal, lingual or facial surfaces of defective RBC restorations with the medium series of aluminum oxide disks (Sof-Lex,3M ESPE) or carbide burs (12 and 30 blades,Brasseler USA, Dental Instrumentation,Savannah, Ga.) and then polished them with afine series of aluminum oxide disks (Sof-Lex, 3M ESPE) and diamond-impregnated composite polisher (ComposiPro Diacomp, Brasseler). For restorations in which proximal surface areas were affected, the clinicians smoothed them with interproximal aluminum oxide finishing strips (Sof-Lex Finishing Strips, 3M ESPE).
Eligibility Criteria
Any person with composite restorations
You may qualify if:
- Patients with more than 20 teeth.
- Restorations in functional occlusion, with an opposing natural tooth.
- Asymptomatic restored tooth.
- At least one proximal contact area with a neighboring tooth.
- Patients older than 18 years.
- Patients who agreed and signed a consent form for participating in the study.
- Area outside of the restoration failure is in good condition.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with contra-indications for regular dental treatment based on their medical history.
- Patients with xerostomia or individuals taking medication that significantly decreased salivary flow.
- Patients with a high risk of caries.
- Patients with psychiatric or physical diseases, which interfered with oral hygiene.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Eduardo Fernandez Godoy
Santiago, 7500505, Chile
Related Publications (2)
Moncada G, Vildosola P, Fernandez E, Estay J, de Oliveira Junior OB, de Andrade MF, Martin J, Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Longitudinal results of a 10-year clinical trial of repair of amalgam restorations. Oper Dent. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):34-43. doi: 10.2341/14-045-C. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
PMID: 25100406RESULTFernandez E, Martin J, Vildosola P, Oliveira Junior OB, Gordan V, Mjor I, Bersezio C, Estay J, de Andrade MF, Moncada G. Can repair increase the longevity of composite resins? Results of a 10-year clinical trial. J Dent. 2015 Feb;43(2):279-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
PMID: 24907560RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
eduardo fernandez
University of Chile
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 10 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Eduardo Fernandez Godoy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2014
First Posted
August 21, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2003
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
August 21, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-08