NCT02222701

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of resin composite restorations refurbished and compare with 2 groups of resins, 1 without treatment and another replaced resins acted as controls. The null hypothesis of this study is that the group of refurbished resins have a similar behavior to the control groups.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2003

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2003

Completed
10.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2013

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 19, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 21, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

August 21, 2014

Status Verified

August 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

10.6 years

First QC Date

August 19, 2014

Last Update Submit

August 20, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

compositedentallongevity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in quality of restorations

    The quality of the restorations was scored according to the modified USPHS criteria. Two examiners underwent calibration exercises each year (JM and EF). Immediately after the treatment (baseline) and 10 years later, the examiners assessed the restorations independently by direct visual and tactile examination with mouth mirror number 5 and explorer number 23 (Hu Friedy Mfg. Co. Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and indirectly by radiographic examination (bite wing). The four parameters examined were anatomic form, secondary caries, marginal staining and marginal adaptation. If the difference was recorded between the two examiners, and if they could not reach an agreement, a third clinician, who also underwent the calibration exercises (GM), made the final decision.

    1 year

Study Arms (3)

Replacement

Composite resins with Alpha values for the marginal adaptation criteria were used as the positive control and were made with resin composite (Filtek Supreme, 3M ESPE), eith rubber dam isolation and the adhesive system L-Pop Prompt (3M-ESPE)

No treatment

Composite resin restorations (Z100, 3M ESPE) in general clinically acceptable, did not receive treatment.

Refurbishing

For this group, The dentists finished the occlusal, lingual or facial surfaces of defective RBC restorations with the medium series of aluminum oxide disks (Sof-Lex,3M ESPE) or carbide burs (12 and 30 blades,Brasseler USA, Dental Instrumentation,Savannah, Ga.) and then polished them with afine series of aluminum oxide disks (Sof-Lex, 3M ESPE) and diamond-impregnated composite polisher (ComposiPro Diacomp, Brasseler). For restorations in which proximal surface areas were affected, the clinicians smoothed them with interproximal aluminum oxide finishing strips (Sof-Lex Finishing Strips, 3M ESPE).

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Any person with composite restorations

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with more than 20 teeth.
  • Restorations in functional occlusion, with an opposing natural tooth.
  • Asymptomatic restored tooth.
  • At least one proximal contact area with a neighboring tooth.
  • Patients older than 18 years.
  • Patients who agreed and signed a consent form for participating in the study.
  • Area outside of the restoration failure is in good condition.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with contra-indications for regular dental treatment based on their medical history.
  • Patients with xerostomia or individuals taking medication that significantly decreased salivary flow.
  • Patients with a high risk of caries.
  • Patients with psychiatric or physical diseases, which interfered with oral hygiene.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Eduardo Fernandez Godoy

Santiago, 7500505, Chile

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Moncada G, Vildosola P, Fernandez E, Estay J, de Oliveira Junior OB, de Andrade MF, Martin J, Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Longitudinal results of a 10-year clinical trial of repair of amalgam restorations. Oper Dent. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):34-43. doi: 10.2341/14-045-C. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

  • Fernandez E, Martin J, Vildosola P, Oliveira Junior OB, Gordan V, Mjor I, Bersezio C, Estay J, de Andrade MF, Moncada G. Can repair increase the longevity of composite resins? Results of a 10-year clinical trial. J Dent. 2015 Feb;43(2):279-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

Study Officials

  • eduardo fernandez

    University of Chile

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
10 Years
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Eduardo Fernandez Godoy

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2014

First Posted

August 21, 2014

Study Start

May 1, 2003

Primary Completion

December 1, 2013

Study Completion

December 1, 2013

Last Updated

August 21, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-08

Locations