Comparative Study of Use of Alpha-Blockers to Treat Symptoms in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy
Prophylactic Versus Therapeutic Alpha-Blockers in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Course Radiation Therapy ± HDR Boost. a GROUQ Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial (PCS-VII).
1 other identifier
interventional
148
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Approximately 50%-95% of prostate cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) develop symptomatic urinary problems .These symptoms can significantly diminish a patient's quality of life during and shortly after therapy. Alpha1-blockers, such as Rapaflo, act to decrease resistance to urinary flow. This multi-institutional phase III trial is designed to compare standard of care versus preventive treatment with Rapaflo for prostate cancer patients, regardless of risk group, whose treatment consists of radical radiation therapy. We plan to recruit 188 patients across Quebec who will be randomized into two arms: rapaflo prescribed at start of radiation therapy or if/when symptoms appear.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jun 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 18, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 20, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2023
CompletedDecember 9, 2024
December 1, 2024
6.8 years
August 18, 2014
December 4, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To determine the rate of increase and the mean difference from the baseline IPSS score in the alpha-blocker (Rapaflo) group compared to the standard arm.
IPSS will be assessed before radiation therapy (RT), 4 weeks into RT, the last day of RT, and monthly for first 6 months and also at 9 and 12 months from the start of RT.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
To determine the rate of IPSS return to baseline, in the alpha-blocker (Rapaflo) group compared to the standard after the end of radiation treatment.
IPSS score will be assessed at before radiation therapy (RT), at 4 and 12 weeks after the end of RT.
To determine the rate of therapy dependence in both groups.
At 3 and 6 months from start of radiation therapy.
Study Arms (2)
Preventive administration of Rapaflo
ACTIVE COMPARATORRapaflo treatment will start on day one of radiation therapy (early administration- before symptoms onset) and continue for a total duration of 6 months: 8 mg daily during 4 months and 8 mg every other day for 2 months.
Standard care
OTHERAdministration of alpha-blocker Rapaflo at the onset of symptomatic urinary problems caused by radiation therapy. 8 mg of Rapaflo is administered daily until disappearance of symptoms.
Interventions
Rapaflo treatment: 8 mg daily during 4 months and 8 mg every other day for 2 months.
Administration of alpha-blocker Rapaflo only at onset of symptoms.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult male 18 years of age or older
- Patients with confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
- The primary treatment should be external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with or without high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost.
- Clinical or radiological diagnosis of T1a - T3b.
- No limitation with respect to Gleason score.
- No limitation with respect to total Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) value.
- Karnofsky performance score (KPS) of ≥ 70.
You may not qualify if:
- Small cell cancer of the prostate
- T4 disease, invading bladder or rectum.
- Adjuvant or salvage radiation therapy
- Brachy monotherapy
- KPS \< 70
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Jewish General Hospital, McGill University
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Pollack A, Zagars GK, Starkschall G, Childress CH, Kopplin S, Boyer AL, Rosen II. Conventional vs. conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary results of dosimetry and acute toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Feb 1;34(3):555-64. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)02103-5.
PMID: 8621278BACKGROUNDTsumura H, Satoh T, Ishiyama H, Tabata K, Kotani S, Minamida S, Kimura M, Fujita T, Matsumoto K, Kitano M, Hayakawa K, Baba S. Comparison of prophylactic naftopidil, tamsulosin, and silodosin for 125I brachytherapy-induced lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with prostate cancer: randomized controlled trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):e385-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.04.026. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
PMID: 21664068BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tamim Niazi, MD
Jewish General Hospital, McGill University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Radiation Oncologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 18, 2014
First Posted
August 20, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 1, 2023
Study Completion
August 1, 2023
Last Updated
December 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share