Efficacy of an Attentional Process Training Using Competitive Versus Non Competitive Strategies
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Within a prospective, randomised, controlled study 60, selected patients with chronic (\> 6 months) stroke or traumatic brain injury will be randomised to 30 1-hour sessions of competitive versus non-competitive attentional training. Competitive training will include fifteen 1-hour sessions of standard (paper and pencil) training under competitive situations and fifteen 1-hour sessions of competitive attentional games designed for this purpose using a new virtual reality system (conventional liquid-crystal-display screen with an infrared LED array to facilitate multi-touch experience embedded in a conventional table). Progress will be evaluated by pre and post measurement of attentional neuropsychological tests, subjective reports of global attention, usability and motivational scales. Our hypothesis is that competitive training is more effective in improving attention than conventional training in the chronic phase after acquired brain injury.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Oct 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 18, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 20, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedAugust 19, 2015
August 1, 2015
5 months
August 18, 2014
August 18, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in attentional psychometric measures
Neuropsychological battery: Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT-II), Color-Trail Test, d2, Stroop test, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV digit-span, Corsi block-tapping test
Baseline versus end of treatment (an expected average of 8 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Usability measures
Baseline versus end of treatment (an expected average of 8 weeks)
Other Outcomes (1)
Family-centered outcomes
Baseline versus end of treatment (an expected average of 8 weeks)
Study Arms (2)
Competitive Training
EXPERIMENTALThe patients will receive only competitive activities designed to restore attention abilities. These include pencil-and-paper tasks completed under competitive circumstances and competitive virtual games specifically designed to treat different aspects of attention (divided, selective, sustained, etc).
Non-Competitive Training
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients will receive conventional attentional training. Pencil and paper tasks focused on different aspects of attention (divided, selective, sustained, etc.) will be completed by all participant under individual or group-therapy sessions. No competitive training will be allowed.
Interventions
30 sessions of competitive cognitive training; 3 - 5 sessions/week; duration 45 min
30 sessions of non-competitive cognitive training; 3 - 5 sessions/week; duration 45 min
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Acquired brain injury patients (stroke and traumatic brain injury)
- Chronicity \> 6 months
- More than 3 months under cognitive rehabilitation
- Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test (comprehension subtest \> 45)
You may not qualify if:
- Severe cognitive impairment defined as \< 23 on Mini Mental Status Examination
- Unable to give informed consent
- Visual or auditive disorders limiting the ability to comply with treatment regimen
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hospitales Nisalead
- Universitat Politècnica de Valènciacollaborator
- University of Sevillecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospitales NISA
Valencia, Valencia, 46011, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roberto Llorens, PhD
Universitat Politècnica de València
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 18, 2014
First Posted
August 20, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 19, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08