Nasopharyngeal Versus Nasal Cannula Oxygen Supplementation in Surgery Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators plan to conduct a randomized, controlled trial comparing nasopharyngeal oxygen supplementation to traditional nasal cannula in patients undergoing oral surgery under moderate sedation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 1, 2017
CompletedJune 1, 2017
May 1, 2016
1.3 years
August 12, 2014
February 3, 2017
May 26, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Oxygen Saturations Below 92%
During surgical procedure
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants Who Needed Airway Assistance Interventions
During surgical procedure
Study Arms (2)
Nasopharyngeal catheter
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this arm will receive oxygen supplementation through the use of a Nasopharyngeal catheter. Sedation will be standardized to ensure consistency between groups.
Nasal Cannula
OTHERPatients will receive oxygen supplementation through the use of a traditional nasal cannula. Sedation will be standardized to ensure consistency between groups.
Interventions
Midazolam 2mg IV, Fentanyl 100mcg IV, Propofol 100 mcg/kg/min. Additional doses of propofol at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients greater than 16 years of age
- Patients who present for oral surgery or esophagoduodenography and colonoscopy
- Patients who undergo intravenous sedation
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who require endotracheal intubation
- ASA class 4 or higher
- Existing esophageal disease such as a perforation or varices
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Cindy Pastern, RN BSN CCRP
- Organization
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bret Alvis, MD
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2014
First Posted
August 19, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
June 1, 2017
Results First Posted
June 1, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-05