Improving Memory Performance by Applying Cognitive Training
IMPACT
Impact of Cognitive Training on Medication Adherence in HIV-infected Individuals
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The proposed study will test the efficacy of a cognitive training program to improve working memory in a sample of HIV-infected persons. Investigators will assign 40 HIV-infected adults with poor medication adherence to one of two conditions (20/group): the experimental cognitive training intervention or a control training condition. Participants will complete 12 training sessions across 10 weeks and will complete assessments at baseline and post-training. The specific aims are to:
- 1.Investigate the effects of the cognitive training intervention on working memory and delay discounting in HIV-infected persons.
- 2.Characterize adherence to antiretroviral medications in this population and examine medication adherence after cognitive training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable hiv
Started Aug 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 29, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 29, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 28, 2017
CompletedJune 28, 2017
May 1, 2017
1.9 years
August 12, 2014
April 19, 2017
May 23, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Working Memory
Standardized neuropsychological tests of working memory used in this study were the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task-50 and Neuropsychological Assessment Battery Digits Forward/Digits Backward Test. Using the most up-to-date published normative data, raw test scores were converted to T-scores that corrected for demographic factors such as age and education. T scores can range from 0 to 100, with 50 being average and higher scores indicating better function. The overall working memory score was computed by averaging T-scores of each of the individual tests. To examine intervention effects on working memory outcomes, we conducted a 2 (Arm: ACT vs. CON) × 2 (Time: Baseline vs. Post) mixed-model general linear model analyses. Time was the within-subjects factor defined by baseline versus 10 week follow-up, and study arm was the between-subjects factor. Age and years of education were included as covariates. The means reported here are the mean scores at 10 weeks.
Baseline and 10 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Delay Discounting
Baseline and 10 weeks
Other Outcomes (1)
Change in Mean Percent Adherence Across All Antiretroviral Medications
Baseline and 10 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Active Cognitive Training (ACT)
EXPERIMENTALThe ACT group will complete 12 individual sessions across 6-10 weeks. Sessions will utilize four commercially available memory-training programs from PSSCogRehab 2012, published by Psychological Software Service. The four programs used will be: (1) Sequence recall of digits - auditory (SRD-A), (2) Sequenced Recall Reversed Digits - Auditory (SRRD-A), (3) Sequenced Recall of Words - Visual (SRW-V), and (4) Verbal memory - categorizing (VM-C). In each training session, participants will complete each of the four memory training programs twice.
Control (CON)
SHAM COMPARATORThe CON group will also complete 12 total sessions across 6-10 weeks. The same four computer programs from PSSCogRehab 2012, published by Psychological Software Service, will be used in the control group sessions. However, the control program will identify the correct responses to participants, such that they do not need to engage their working memory to answer the questions correctly.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- HIV infection, diagnosed for \> 6 months
- Currently on treatment with antiretroviral medications for \> 3 months
- Self-reported medication adherence at less than 90%
- Lives within 15 miles of the research site in stable housing and with no plans to move from the area in the next 3 months
You may not qualify if:
- Current substance use disorder
- Any drug use other than alcohol or marijuana in the past year
- Pregnancy
- English non-fluency or illiteracy
- ≤ 8th grade education
- serious neurological disorders, including HIV dementia
- traumatic brain injury
- severe mental illness or acute psychiatric distress
- impaired mental status
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27708, United States
Related Publications (2)
Bickel WK, Yi R, Landes RD, Hill PF, Baxter C. Remember the future: working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts. Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Feb 1;69(3):260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.08.017. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
PMID: 20965498BACKGROUNDLovejoy TI, Suhr JA. The relationship between neuropsychological functioning and HAART adherence in HIV-positive adults: a systematic review. J Behav Med. 2009 Oct;32(5):389-405. doi: 10.1007/s10865-009-9212-9. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
PMID: 19291386BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The overall target sample size of 40 was not reached, and therefore we may have been underpowered to detect differences on secondary outcome measures.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Sheri Towe
- Organization
- Duke University School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sheri L Towe, PhD
Duke University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2014
First Posted
August 15, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 29, 2016
Study Completion
June 29, 2016
Last Updated
June 28, 2017
Results First Posted
June 28, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05