Pilot Study of PEMF Therapy in Treatment of Post-operative Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy in the Treatment of Persistent Post-Operative Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
35
1 country
14
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether pulsed electromagnetic energy field (PEMF) therapy is effective in the treatment of persistent pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2014
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 7, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 27, 2017
CompletedOctober 27, 2017
September 1, 2017
1.5 years
August 1, 2014
October 26, 2016
September 27, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Pain Intensity
Percent change from Baseline in Pain Intensity (PI): a validated 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) with scores (0-10) collected as patient-reported outcomes on an electronic diary (ePRO). A score of 0 represents 'No Pain' while a score of 10 represents "Worst Pain Imaginable".
Assessed at Day 60 as compared to Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Mean Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Mean change from Day 0 to Day 75
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Responders at Day 75 (compared to baseline)
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Day 75
Analgesic Consumption
Day 56 to Day 60 (compared to baseline)
Change From Baseline in Range of Motion (ROM)
Days 0 (Baseline) and Day 75
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Device
ACTIVE COMPARATORPulsed Electromagnetic Field therapy device; self-administered at home twice daily for 30 minutes.
Sham Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Device
SHAM COMPARATORInactive Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy device; self-administered at home twice daily for 30 minutes.
Interventions
The PEMF device delivers non-thermal, non-ionizing pulsed electromagnetic energy to the target tissue, using 27.12 megahertz pulses lasting 42 microseconds and delivered 1000 times per second. The system generates an electromagnetic field that is continuously monitored and regulated to ensure consistent dosing. The therapeutic electromagnetic field is delivered by means of an applicator pad that is placed against the treatment site. The active and sham devices will be identical in appearance and all other physical characteristics in order to maintain the masking of the treatment.
The Sham device will be identical in appearance, physical characteristics and operation to the Active device.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject age is greater or equal to 18 years.
- Subject has undergone a total knee replacement for the treatment of osteoarthritis, and has persistent post-operative pain in the index knee for \> 3 months and \< 36 months following surgery.
- Subject has been receiving medication for persistent post-operative knee pain, including opioid or non-opioid analgesic medication that is administered on an "as needed" (prn) basis, and is on a stable analgesic dosing regimen (i.e. the same medications and dosages) for \> 30 days prior to the screening visit.
- Mean Pain Intensity (calculated as the mean of the daily average pain intensity scores) is ≥3 and \< 9 as measured on Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) during the run-in phase.
- Subject has completed a minimum of 80% (8 of 10 possible) of the pain intensity assessments during the run-in phase.
- Subject is willing and able to wear an activity meter from the screening visit through Day 75.
- Subject is able to access an internet browser in the home environment.
- Subject is willing and able to give written informed consent and to comply with all parts of the study protocol.
- Female Subjects must be post menopausal, surgically sterile, abstinent, or practicing (or agree to practice) an effective method of birth control if they are sexually active for the duration of the study. (Effective methods of birth control include prescription hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices, double-barrier methods, and/or male partner sterilization).
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has undergone simultaneous bilateral knee arthroplasty or revision arthroplasty on the index knee.
- Subject requires revision surgery prior to Day 75.
- Subject has undergone manipulation under anesthesia of the index knee or any local injection into the index knee within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit, or within 6 weeks prior to the Screening Visit for long acting lidocaine injection products.
- Subject has received any investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit or is enrolled in another clinical trial.
- Subjects consuming an average of \> 100 mg oral Morphine Sulfate equivalents per day during the run-in phase.
- Subject has evidence on physical or radiological exam of joint instability or infection involving the index knee.
- Passive range of motion demonstrates maximal flexion of the index knee \< 90 degrees or maximal extension of the index knee \< -10 degrees.
- Body Mass Index (BMI) \< 19 kg/m2, or \> 38 kg/m2.
- Subject has a history of any uncontrolled medical illness that in the investigator's judgment places the subject at unacceptable risk for receipt of Provant therapy.
- Subject has an ongoing painful condition that in the opinion of the Investigator might have a confounding influence on the safety or effectiveness analysis for this study.
- Use of systemic corticosteroids within 2 months of the Screening visit.
- Subject anticipates the need for surgery of any type through the Day 75 visit.
- Subjects whom, in the judgment of the Investigator, have serious psychosocial co-morbidities.
- History of drug or alcohol abuse within one year prior to screening.
- Subject has a history of malignancy within the past five years other than successfully treated non-metastatic basal cell or squamous cell carcinomas of the skin in the treatment area and/or localized carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (14)
Unknown Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, 85023, United States
Unknown Facility
El Cajon, California, 92020, United States
Unknown Facility
Lone Tree, Colorado, 80124, United States
Unknown Facility
Bradenton, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, 10022, United States
Unknown Facility
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303, United States
Unknown Facility
St. George, Utah, 84790, United States
Unknown Facility
Danville, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Spokane, Washington, 99218, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Heather Vander Ploeg
- Organization
- Regenesis Biomedical
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2014
First Posted
August 7, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 27, 2017
Results First Posted
October 27, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09