NCT02211534

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether pulsed electromagnetic energy field (PEMF) therapy is effective in the treatment of persistent pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
35

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

14 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 1, 2014

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 7, 2014

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2014

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2016

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 27, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

October 27, 2017

Status Verified

September 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

August 1, 2014

Results QC Date

October 26, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 27, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Pulsed Electromagnetic Energy FieldsTotal Knee ArthroplastyPain Intensity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Pain Intensity

    Percent change from Baseline in Pain Intensity (PI): a validated 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) with scores (0-10) collected as patient-reported outcomes on an electronic diary (ePRO). A score of 0 represents 'No Pain' while a score of 10 represents "Worst Pain Imaginable".

    Assessed at Day 60 as compared to Baseline

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Mean Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    Mean change from Day 0 to Day 75

  • Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

    Responders at Day 75 (compared to baseline)

  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    Day 75

  • Analgesic Consumption

    Day 56 to Day 60 (compared to baseline)

  • Change From Baseline in Range of Motion (ROM)

    Days 0 (Baseline) and Day 75

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Device

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field therapy device; self-administered at home twice daily for 30 minutes.

Device: Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Device (Provant)

Sham Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Device

SHAM COMPARATOR

Inactive Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy device; self-administered at home twice daily for 30 minutes.

Device: Sham Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Device

Interventions

The PEMF device delivers non-thermal, non-ionizing pulsed electromagnetic energy to the target tissue, using 27.12 megahertz pulses lasting 42 microseconds and delivered 1000 times per second. The system generates an electromagnetic field that is continuously monitored and regulated to ensure consistent dosing. The therapeutic electromagnetic field is delivered by means of an applicator pad that is placed against the treatment site. The active and sham devices will be identical in appearance and all other physical characteristics in order to maintain the masking of the treatment.

Also known as: Provant Therapy System
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Device

The Sham device will be identical in appearance, physical characteristics and operation to the Active device.

Also known as: Sham Provant Therapy System
Sham Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Device

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject age is greater or equal to 18 years.
  • Subject has undergone a total knee replacement for the treatment of osteoarthritis, and has persistent post-operative pain in the index knee for \> 3 months and \< 36 months following surgery.
  • Subject has been receiving medication for persistent post-operative knee pain, including opioid or non-opioid analgesic medication that is administered on an "as needed" (prn) basis, and is on a stable analgesic dosing regimen (i.e. the same medications and dosages) for \> 30 days prior to the screening visit.
  • Mean Pain Intensity (calculated as the mean of the daily average pain intensity scores) is ≥3 and \< 9 as measured on Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) during the run-in phase.
  • Subject has completed a minimum of 80% (8 of 10 possible) of the pain intensity assessments during the run-in phase.
  • Subject is willing and able to wear an activity meter from the screening visit through Day 75.
  • Subject is able to access an internet browser in the home environment.
  • Subject is willing and able to give written informed consent and to comply with all parts of the study protocol.
  • Female Subjects must be post menopausal, surgically sterile, abstinent, or practicing (or agree to practice) an effective method of birth control if they are sexually active for the duration of the study. (Effective methods of birth control include prescription hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices, double-barrier methods, and/or male partner sterilization).

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject has undergone simultaneous bilateral knee arthroplasty or revision arthroplasty on the index knee.
  • Subject requires revision surgery prior to Day 75.
  • Subject has undergone manipulation under anesthesia of the index knee or any local injection into the index knee within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit, or within 6 weeks prior to the Screening Visit for long acting lidocaine injection products.
  • Subject has received any investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit or is enrolled in another clinical trial.
  • Subjects consuming an average of \> 100 mg oral Morphine Sulfate equivalents per day during the run-in phase.
  • Subject has evidence on physical or radiological exam of joint instability or infection involving the index knee.
  • Passive range of motion demonstrates maximal flexion of the index knee \< 90 degrees or maximal extension of the index knee \< -10 degrees.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) \< 19 kg/m2, or \> 38 kg/m2.
  • Subject has a history of any uncontrolled medical illness that in the investigator's judgment places the subject at unacceptable risk for receipt of Provant therapy.
  • Subject has an ongoing painful condition that in the opinion of the Investigator might have a confounding influence on the safety or effectiveness analysis for this study.
  • Use of systemic corticosteroids within 2 months of the Screening visit.
  • Subject anticipates the need for surgery of any type through the Day 75 visit.
  • Subjects whom, in the judgment of the Investigator, have serious psychosocial co-morbidities.
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse within one year prior to screening.
  • Subject has a history of malignancy within the past five years other than successfully treated non-metastatic basal cell or squamous cell carcinomas of the skin in the treatment area and/or localized carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
  • +6 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (14)

Unknown Facility

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Phoenix, Arizona, 85018, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Phoenix, Arizona, 85023, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

El Cajon, California, 92020, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lone Tree, Colorado, 80124, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New York, New York, 10022, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St. George, Utah, 84790, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Danville, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Spokane, Washington, 99218, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Heather Vander Ploeg
Organization
Regenesis Biomedical

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2014

First Posted

August 7, 2014

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion

March 1, 2016

Study Completion

March 1, 2016

Last Updated

October 27, 2017

Results First Posted

October 27, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-09

Locations