Effects of Stress on Observers and Their Subsequent Performance During High Fidelity Simulation-based Training.
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial aims to determine if the stress response and performance of trainees who are observers in simulation training is similar to trainees who are actively participating in simulation training in the 'hotseat' during 3 consecutive simulation sessions. We hypothesize that trainees experience less stress when they are observers in the first 2 simulation sessions. However, when they are placed in the 'hotseat' during the third session, their stress response, as well as their performance, will be similar to trainees who spend all 3 simulation sessions in the 'hotseat'.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 7, 2014
CompletedAugust 7, 2014
August 1, 2014
1.4 years
August 5, 2014
August 6, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Salivary Cortisol from baseline
Salivary cortisol measurement. Saliva collected using Salimetric oral swabs and salivary cortisol measured using ELISA technique.
From baseline to end of the simulation session, typically after 15 minutes.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Salivary amylase
From baseline to end of the simulation session, typically after 15 minutes.
Anaesthetist's non-technical skills score
During simulation, typically lasting 15 minutes.
DASS questionnaire
At the end of simulation session
Study Arms (2)
Observer
EXPERIMENTALTrainees are in the role of observers (not actively participating in simulation scenario) during first 2 simulation sessions, then placed in the role in the 'hotseat' actively participating during the third simulation session.
Hotseat
ACTIVE COMPARATORTrainees are in the 'hotseat' actively participating during all 3 simulation sessions
Interventions
Trainees are in the role of observers (not actively participating in simulation scenario) during first 2 simulation sessions, then placed in the role in the 'hotseat' actively participating during the third simulation session.
Trainees in the hotseat group are placed in the 'hotseat' to actively participate and manage the simulated medical crises in the simulation scenarios.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Anaesthesia residents in their 2nd or 3rd year of training
You may not qualify if:
- Hypertension
- Cardiac disease
- Endocrine disorder
- Use of beta-blockers
- Recent stressful or traumatic life events
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- KK Women's and Children's Hospitallead
- Singhealth Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
KK Women's and Children's Hospital
Singapore, Singapore, 229899, Singapore
Related Publications (2)
Bong CL, Lightdale JR, Fredette ME, Weinstock P. Effects of simulation versus traditional tutorial-based training on physiologic stress levels among clinicians: a pilot study. Simul Healthc. 2010 Oct;5(5):272-8. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181e98b29.
PMID: 21330809BACKGROUNDBong CL, Lee S, Ng ASB, Allen JC, Lim EHL, Vidyarthi A. The effects of active (hot-seat) versus observer roles during simulation-based training on stress levels and non-technical performance: a randomized trial. Adv Simul (Lond). 2017 Mar 20;2:7. doi: 10.1186/s41077-017-0040-7. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 29450008DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Choon L Bong, MBChB FRCA
KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2014
First Posted
August 7, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
February 1, 2014
Study Completion
February 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 7, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-08