A Comparison of the C-mac and Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study aims to determine the better device to facilitate intubation in patients with a limited neck movement and small mouth opening. This may help anesthesiology as well as emergency medicine practitioners and departments to decide when choosing between these two conceptually similar device. The hypothesis to be tested is that the C-MAC® is more superior when compared to the Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope in success of intubation, time to intubation and complication rate in patients with a fixed cervical collar.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedApril 28, 2016
April 1, 2016
2.3 years
August 5, 2014
April 27, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success of intubation on first attempt
A rigid cervical collar will to each patient to stimulate a difficult airway and standard induction of general anaesthesia will be carried out. Adequate muscle relaxation will be confirmed by the use of a standard neuromuscular Train-of-Four monitor, showing no twitch. Intubation will then proceed with the assigned airway device. A successful outcome at intubation will involve being able to pass an appropriately sized endotracheal tube pass the vocal cords into the trachea on the first try, as evidenced by the presence of end tidal carbon dioxide on a capnograph.
up to 10min - from time of induction to appearance of end tidal carbon dioxide on capnograph after first attempt at intubation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Time taken to successful intubation
up to 10min - from time of induction to appearance of end tidal carbon dioxide on capnograph after successful intubation
Study Arms (2)
Karl Storz C-MAC
EXPERIMENTALIntubation of patient using the Karl Storz C-MAC video laryngoscope
Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope
EXPERIMENTALIntubation of patient using Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia who require endotracheal intubation
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with history of previous difficult endotracheal intubation
- Patients with two or more predictors of difficult mask ventilation or difficult intubation or the combination of both
- Patients with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grading of III and above are excluded from the study, as well as patients with 2 or more predictors for difficult mask ventilation or difficult intubation or the combination of both.
- Patients needing a rapid sequence induction for rapid securement of the airway
- Pregnant women
- Patients below the age of 21 years old
- Patients unfit to give consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, Singapore, 169608, Singapore
Related Publications (1)
Abdullah HR, Li-Ming T, Marriott A, Wong TG. A comparison between the Bonfils Intubation Fiberscope and McCoy laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with a simulated difficult airway. Anesth Analg. 2013 Nov;117(5):1217-20. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a46fa9.
PMID: 24029854BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Theodore GL Wong
Singapore General Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2014
First Posted
August 6, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 28, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04