The Symphony Triple A Study: Using Symphony in Treatment Decisions Concerning Adjuvant Systemic Therapy
Symphony
1 other identifier
observational
660
1 country
34
Brief Summary
Rationale: Prediction of prognosis in patients with breast cancer is important to determine the indication for adjuvant chemo-, endocrine- and immunotherapy. Apart from the clinicopathological parameters incorporated into the Adjuvant!Online predictive model, the validated 70-gene signature MammaPrint® is predictive of outcome too. MammaPrint® is advised in the current Dutch CBO guideline (2012) for hormone receptor positive, invasive ductal breast cancer in individual cases when there is 'doubt' about the indication for adjuvant chemotherapy based on traditional prognostic factors. In the present study MammaPrint® is used in this CBO 2012 guideline defined group of patients as an additional test for decision-making for adjuvant chemotherapy. Objective: To assess the impact of MammaPrint® on clinical decision making regarding the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in the CBO 2012 guideline defined group of hormone receptor positive invasive ductal carcinoma patients when there is doubt about the indication for adjuvant chemotherapy based on traditional prognostic factors. The influence of various factors and the impact of MammaPrint® in predefined subgroups will be analyzed too. Data from a national registry regarding adjuvant systemic treatment in patients with similar clinicopathological characteristics in whom MammaPrint® was not used will be obtained to provide a control group. Hypothesis: In the group of patients where national guidelines advocate using systemic therapy but doctors are ambivalent in treating patients with adjuvant chemotherapy, it is hypothesized that using MammaPrint® as an additional test will change the indication for adjuvant therapy in a substantial proportion of patients resulting in at least 10% less patients who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, in the study group at least 10% less patients will receive chemotherapy when compared to a contemporary group of patients with similar clinicopathological characteristics but without using MammaPrint® Study population: Hormone receptor positive, invasive ductal breast cancer patients when there is doubt about the indication for adjuvant chemotherapy based on traditional prognostic factors. Study design: This is a prospective multicentre impact study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2013
Typical duration for all trials
34 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedFebruary 15, 2017
February 1, 2017
3.2 years
July 24, 2014
February 14, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Frequency of adjuvant chemotherapy
We will measure and compare the proportion of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy in the group of patients receiving MammaPrint and the group who doesn't receive MammaPrint. In addition we'll record the type of chemotherapy given.
Within one month after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Changes in adjuvant systemic treatment decisions due to MammaPrint use
Within one month after (initial) surgery
Influence of BluePrint and TargetPrint on adjuvant systemic treatment decisions
Within one month after (initial) surgery
Clinical utility of MammaPrint in multicentric/contralateral disease.
Within one month after (initial) surgery
Concordance of TargetPrint results with locally assessed ICH/FISH ER, PR and Her2 results
Within one month after (initial) surgery
Comparison of clinical subtype with BluePrint molecular subtype
Within one month after (initial) surgery
Eligibility Criteria
The study population is the CBO 2012 guideline defined group of hormone receptor positive, invasive ductal breast cancer patients when there is doubt about the indication for adjuvant chemotherapy based on traditional prognostic factors. Patients are included and MammaPrint® is determined after complete histological assessment following definitive surgery. The following pathology items have to be recorded: tumour size, grade, ER- and PR- receptor status, Her-2 neu status, and lymph node status. No difference is made in ethnical background or past medical history other than cancer.
You may qualify if:
- Oestrogen receptor positive, invasive ductal and female breast cancer patients where the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy is uncertain based on traditional prognostic factors
- Written informed consent
- Patients with multicentric or contralateral disease
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a previous history of malignancy (in the five years before breast cancer diagnosis), excluding basal cell carcinoma.
- Patients with confirmed distant metastasis.
- Patients who undergo neoadjuvant systemic treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Diakonessenhuis, Utrechtlead
- Agendiacollaborator
Study Sites (34)
Whilhelmina ziekenhuis
Assen, Drenthe, 9041RK, Netherlands
Medisch Centrum Zuiderzee
Lelystad, Flevoland, 8233AA, Netherlands
Gelre ziekenhuis
Apeldoorn, Gelderland, 7334 DZ, Netherlands
Rijnstate
Arnhem, Gelderland, 6815AD, Netherlands
Gederse Vallei
Ede, Gelderland, 6716RP, Netherlands
Sint Jansdal
Harderwijk, Gelderland, 3844DG, Netherlands
Ziekenhuis Rivierenland
Tiel, Gelderland, 4000 HA, Netherlands
Gelre ziekenhuis
Zutphen, Gelderland, 7207 AE, Netherlands
Jeroen Bosch ziekenhuis
's-Hertogenbosch, North Brabant, 5301EH, Netherlands
Medisch Centrum Alkmaar
Alkmaar, North Holland, 1815JD, Netherlands
Boven IJ ziekenhuis
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1034CS, Netherlands
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1091AC, Netherlands
Gemini ziekenhuis
Den Helder, North Holland, 1782GZ, Netherlands
Kennemer Gasthuis
Haarlem, North Holland, 2035RC, Netherlands
Spaarne ziekenhuis
Hoofddorp, North Holland, 2134TM, Netherlands
Westfriesgasthuis
Hoorn, North Holland, 1624NP, Netherlands
Waterland ziekenhuis
Purmerend, North Holland, 1441RN, Netherlands
Vlietland ziekenhuis
Schiedam, North Holland, 3118 JH, Netherlands
Zaans medisch centrum
Zaandam, North Holland, 1502DV, Netherlands
Deventer ziekenhuis
Deventer, Overijssel, 7416SE, Netherlands
Ropcke Zweers ziekenhuis
Hardenberg, Overijssel, 7772SE, Netherlands
Isale klinieken
Zwolle, Overijssel, 8011 JW, Netherlands
Nij Smellinghe ziekenhuis
Drachten, Provincie Friesland, 9202 NN, Netherlands
Tjongerschans
Heerenveen, Provincie Friesland, 8441PW, Netherlands
Antoniusziekenhuis
Sneek, Provincie Friesland, 8601ZK, Netherlands
Martini ziekenhuis
Groningen, Provincie Groningen, 9728NT, Netherlands
IJsselland ziekenhuis
Capelle aan den IJssel, South Holland, 2906ZC, Netherlands
Sint Fransiscus gasthuis
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3045 PM, Netherlands
Lange Land ziekenhuis
Zoetermeer, South Holland, 2700 KJ, Netherlands
Alexander Monro ziekenhuis
Bilthoven, Utrecht, 3723 MB, Netherlands
Ter Gooi ziekenhuis
Hilversum, Utrecht, 1201 DA, Netherlands
Sint Antoniusziekenhuis
Nieuwegein, Utrecht, 3435CM, Netherlands
Diakonessenziekenhuis
Utrecht, Utrecht, 3508 TG, Netherlands
Zuwe Hofpoort ziekenhuis
Woerden, Utrecht, 3447GN, Netherlands
Related Publications (12)
Ravdin PM, Siminoff LA, Davis GJ, Mercer MB, Hewlett J, Gerson N, Parker HL. Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb 15;19(4):980-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.4.980.
PMID: 11181660BACKGROUNDPerou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, Pollack JR, Ross DT, Johnsen H, Akslen LA, Fluge O, Pergamenschikov A, Williams C, Zhu SX, Lonning PE, Borresen-Dale AL, Brown PO, Botstein D. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000 Aug 17;406(6797):747-52. doi: 10.1038/35021093.
PMID: 10963602BACKGROUNDvan de Vijver MJ, He YD, van't Veer LJ, Dai H, Hart AA, Voskuil DW, Schreiber GJ, Peterse JL, Roberts C, Marton MJ, Parrish M, Atsma D, Witteveen A, Glas A, Delahaye L, van der Velde T, Bartelink H, Rodenhuis S, Rutgers ET, Friend SH, Bernards R. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 19;347(25):1999-2009. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021967.
PMID: 12490681BACKGROUNDvan 't Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Hart AA, Mao M, Peterse HL, van der Kooy K, Marton MJ, Witteveen AT, Schreiber GJ, Kerkhoven RM, Roberts C, Linsley PS, Bernards R, Friend SH. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002 Jan 31;415(6871):530-6. doi: 10.1038/415530a.
PMID: 11823860BACKGROUNDBuyse M, Loi S, van't Veer L, Viale G, Delorenzi M, Glas AM, d'Assignies MS, Bergh J, Lidereau R, Ellis P, Harris A, Bogaerts J, Therasse P, Floore A, Amakrane M, Piette F, Rutgers E, Sotiriou C, Cardoso F, Piccart MJ; TRANSBIG Consortium. Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Sep 6;98(17):1183-92. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj329.
PMID: 16954471BACKGROUNDBueno-de-Mesquita JM, Linn SC, Keijzer R, Wesseling J, Nuyten DS, van Krimpen C, Meijers C, de Graaf PW, Bos MM, Hart AA, Rutgers EJ, Peterse JL, Halfwerk H, de Groot R, Pronk A, Floore AN, Glas AM, Van't Veer LJ, van de Vijver MJ. Validation of 70-gene prognosis signature in node-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Oct;117(3):483-95. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0191-2. Epub 2008 Sep 26.
PMID: 18819002BACKGROUNDMook S, Schmidt MK, Viale G, Pruneri G, Eekhout I, Floore A, Glas AM, Bogaerts J, Cardoso F, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Rutgers ET, Van't Veer LJ; TRANSBIG Consortium. The 70-gene prognosis-signature predicts disease outcome in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes in an independent validation study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Jul;116(2):295-302. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0130-2. Epub 2008 Jul 27.
PMID: 18661261BACKGROUNDKnauer M, Mook S, Rutgers EJ, Bender RA, Hauptmann M, van de Vijver MJ, Koornstra RH, Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, Linn SC, van 't Veer LJ. The predictive value of the 70-gene signature for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Apr;120(3):655-61. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0814-2. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
PMID: 20204499BACKGROUNDMook S, Schmidt MK, Weigelt B, Kreike B, Eekhout I, van de Vijver MJ, Glas AM, Floore A, Rutgers EJT, van 't Veer LJ. The 70-gene prognosis signature predicts early metastasis in breast cancer patients between 55 and 70 years of age. Ann Oncol. 2010 Apr;21(4):717-722. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp388. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
PMID: 19825882BACKGROUNDMook S, Knauer M, Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, Retel VP, Wesseling J, Linn SC, Van't Veer LJ, Rutgers EJ. Metastatic potential of T1 breast cancer can be predicted by the 70-gene MammaPrint signature. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 May;17(5):1406-13. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0902-x. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
PMID: 20094918BACKGROUNDBueno-de-Mesquita JM, van Harten WH, Retel VP, van 't Veer LJ, van Dam FS, Karsenberg K, Douma KF, van Tinteren H, Peterse JL, Wesseling J, Wu TS, Atsma D, Rutgers EJ, Brink G, Floore AN, Glas AM, Roumen RM, Bellot FE, van Krimpen C, Rodenhuis S, van de Vijver MJ, Linn SC. Use of 70-gene signature to predict prognosis of patients with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective community-based feasibility study (RASTER). Lancet Oncol. 2007 Dec;8(12):1079-1087. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70346-7. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
PMID: 18042430BACKGROUNDDrukker CA, Bueno-de-Mesquita JM, Retel VP, van Harten WH, van Tinteren H, Wesseling J, Roumen RM, Knauer M, van 't Veer LJ, Sonke GS, Rutgers EJ, van de Vijver MJ, Linn SC. A prospective evaluation of a breast cancer prognosis signature in the observational RASTER study. Int J Cancer. 2013 Aug 15;133(4):929-36. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28082. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
PMID: 23371464BACKGROUND
Related Links
Biospecimen
The tissue specimen for MammaPrint® analysis consists of a tumour block or 10 unstained slides with 5µm section on each slide. The tissue can be shipped as formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue. For further information: www.agendia.com or www.symphonytripleA.nl.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thijs van Dalen, Dr
Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, The Netherlands
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2014
First Posted
August 6, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 15, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02