NCT02208999

Brief Summary

Assessing the long-term efficacy, complications, revision rates and final explantation of the device

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
106

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2013

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2013

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 1, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 5, 2014

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2017

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 6, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

November 6, 2019

Status Verified

November 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

August 1, 2014

Results QC Date

June 14, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 5, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

medullary neurostimulationpainPrecisionrechargeableimplantable

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Percentage of Implanted Patients (de Novo Implants) With an Improvement of at Least 50% of the Overall Average Pain Over the Last 8 Days, Evaluated by Numerical Scale at the First Follow-up Visit, at 1 Year, and 2 Years.

    Percentage of patients (de novo implants) having a reduction of usual pain over the past 8 days of at least 50% at 12 and 24 months. The pain was measured with a numerical scale from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = most intense pain). This data has been provided by 71 patients at 1 year and by 70 patients at 2 years.

    From baseline until the end of the study at 24 months.

  • Average Pain Score Over the Last 8 Days, Evaluated by Numerical Scale at 1 Year, and at 2 Years.

    The pain was evaluated with a numerical scale from 0 to 10. 0 = no pain and 10 = most intense pain. This data has been provided by 71 patients at 1 year and by 70 patients at 2 years.

    From baseline until the end of the study at 24 months.

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Percentage of Implanted Patients (de Novo Implants) With an Improvement of at Least 30% of the Overall Average Pain, Evaluated by Numerical Scale

    From baseline until the end of the study at 24 months

  • Patients' Opinion on the Evolution of Pain

    From baseline until the end of the study at 24 months

  • Evolution of the Use of Other Pain Treatments

    From baseline until the end of the study at 24 months

  • Evolution of Quality of Life (SF-12) - Physical Score

    From baseline until the end of the study at 24 months

  • Patients' Willingness to Restart the Treatment

    From baseline until the end of the study at 24 months

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Neurostimulator Precision

Patients implanted or reimplanted with the neurostimulator Precision

Device: Neurostimulator Precision

Interventions

All patients included must have been implanted with the neurostimulator Precision

Neurostimulator Precision

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

All implanted patients (primary implementation and reimplantation) with the neurostimulator PRECISION ®, during the inclusion period (1 year).

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patient receiving spinal implantation of a neurostimulator PRECISION ® ( primary implantation or reimplantation)

You may not qualify if:

  • Refusal of patient
  • Patient whose long-term monitoring will not be possible

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospitals implanting the neurostimulator Precision

Multiple Locations, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

Study performed in real-life conditions , based on standard of care and some follow-ups were not considered as routine visits.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Stéphane Bouée, Medical director
Organization
CEMKA

Study Officials

  • Elisabeth Dr Mouton, MD

    Boston Scientific Corporation

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2014

First Posted

August 5, 2014

Study Start

December 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 1, 2017

Study Completion

December 1, 2017

Last Updated

November 6, 2019

Results First Posted

November 6, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared; Only aggregated data will be communicated

Locations