NCT02208778

Brief Summary

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease and is the most common form of arthritis. Pain reduction and functional recovery are the key elements of the clinical management of OA. Current treatment guidelines recommend a combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. However, these are not always effective, with nearly 20% of patients not responding to any standard therapy, including joint replacement. The mechanisms of pain relief are not well understood and are complicated by the remarkably large placebo effect, and inter-individual variation. There is no objective criteria for predicting whether a patient will respond to a given treatment Duloxetine, an antidepressant drug, has proven effectiveness in various chronic pain syndromes including knee OA. The effect is however limited and only clinically relevant in around half of the trial patients. Importantly, it is currently unclear how and in whom duloxetine alleviates chronic pain. Advanced MRI techniques use strong magnetic fields and radio frequency signals to generate metabolic, anatomical and functional brain images (fMRI). Remifentanil is a potent analgesic agent whose analgesic effect has been well characterised in healthy volunteers, including fMRI studies showing modulation of activation of regions in the brain related to pain processing. Nevertheless, the neural correlates of remifentanil effects have not yet been investigated in chronic pain patients. The aim of this research is to use a combination of multimodal MRI, genetic and psychometric assessments to identify the mechanisms of pain relief in knee OA patients, following treatments with duloxetine and remifentanil, in a placebo controlled condition. With this we also aim to identify genetic, anatomical and brain activity predictors of treatment outcomes. The main hypotheses are:

  • Analgesic response to duloxetine treatment can be predicted using a range of baseline brain imaging markers and QST.
  • Analgesic response to duloxetine is mediated by modulation of neural networks underpinning emotional control.
  • Duloxetine-induced changes in brain activation differ between responders and non-responders. This study is expected to last for two years. It is funded by Arthritis Research United Kingdom and forms part of a wider scientific investigation, using translational methodologies, to enhance the understanding of arthritis pain and to improve its treatment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
77

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 4, 2014

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 5, 2014

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2014

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

November 27, 2017

Status Verified

May 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

August 4, 2014

Last Update Submit

November 23, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

OsteoarthritisChronic PainPain relief

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Reduction in nociceptive brain response after duloxetine

    Baseline, week six

  • Neural network change (resting condition) induced by duloxetine

    Baseline, week six

  • Predicting response to duloxetine from baseline fMRI metrics using univariate and multivariate analysis

    Baseline, week six

  • Differences in brain response and network change between responders and non-responders

    Baseline, week six

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Identification of QST and questionnaire parameters that predict response to duloxetine

    Baseline, week six

  • Correlation between baseline CPM and TS with brain activity and connectivity changes

    Baseline, week six

  • Group differences in brain activity and structure in pain processing, limbic and modulatory pathways changes following duloxetine treatment in comparison to placebo

    Baseline, week six

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Determination of gene variations that can be linked with duloxetine treatment response

    Baseline, week six

Study Arms (4)

Duloxetine

EXPERIMENTAL

Duloxetine 30 mg a day (2 weeks), then 60 mg a day (4weeks), taken by mouth

Drug: Duloxetine

Placebo (for Duloxetine)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Sugar pill: 1 capsule a day (2 weeks), then 2 capsules a day (4 weeks) taken by mouth

Drug: Placebo (for Duloxetine)

Remifentanil

EXPERIMENTAL

Intravenous infusion with maximum estimated plasma target of 1.0 ng/ml, during less than 20 minutes

Drug: Remifentanil

Placebo (for Remifentanil)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Intravenous infusion of normal saline, during less than 20 min

Drug: Placebo (for Remifentanil)

Interventions

54 participants will be allocated for duloxetine treatment

Also known as: Cymbalta
Duloxetine

27 participants will be allocated to Remifentanil infusion

Also known as: Remifentanil hydrochloride
Remifentanil

Placebo comparator to Remifentanil treatment. 27 participants will be allocated to this arm

Also known as: Sodium chloride, Normal saline
Placebo (for Remifentanil)

Sugar pill manufactured to mimic Duloxetine 30mg. 27 participants will be allocated to this intervention

Also known as: Sugar pill
Placebo (for Duloxetine)

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Radiographically defined OA knee changes with knee pain
  • Must have self-reported knee pain
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Over 35 years old
  • Male or female
  • Females not pregnant or lactating and using effective contraception

You may not qualify if:

  • People with any known contraindication to MRI like
  • Intraocular metallic foreign bodies;
  • Intracranial aneurysm clips;
  • Cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators;
  • Cochlear implants;
  • People with a significant head tremor;
  • People with potential metal foreign bodies due to previous accidents;
  • Breastfeeding or pregnancy, confirmed by pregnancy test;
  • People that are felt to be unfit for the MRI scan according to the judgement of medically qualified personnel, either on the research team, or the patient's clinical team. (eg. due to back pain, claustrophobia, acute sickness etc.) This includes patients with signs of impaired temperature regulation such as an extremely high fever;
  • Patients with large tattoos, specifically in the head, neck or shoulder region;
  • Persons that do not have the capacity to consent;
  • Aged less than 35;
  • Major medical, neurological and psychiatric co-morbidities;
  • Other significant medical condition;
  • Metallic agents embedded within the body (ie. Shrapnel, surgical pins);
  • +16 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Nottingham - School of Medicine - Radiological Sciences

Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Reckziegel D, Bailey H, Cottam WJ, Tench CR, Mahajan RP, Walsh DA, Knaggs RD, Auer DP. Imaging pain relief in osteoarthritis (IPRO): protocol of a double-blind randomised controlled mechanistic study assessing pain relief and prediction of duloxetine treatment outcome. BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 26;7(6):e014013. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014013.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

OsteoarthritisChronic Pain

Interventions

Duloxetine HydrochlorideRemifentanilSodium ChlorideSaline SolutionSugars

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ThiophenesSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPropionatesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsPiperidinesChloridesHydrochloric AcidChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsSodium CompoundsCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical PreparationsCarbohydrates

Study Officials

  • Dorothee P Auer, PhD

    University of Nottingham

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2014

First Posted

August 5, 2014

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion

June 1, 2016

Study Completion

June 1, 2016

Last Updated

November 27, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-05

Locations