Imaging Pain Relief in Osteoarthritis
IPRO
Functional Brain Imaging to Understand the Mechanisms of Pain Relief in Knee Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
77
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease and is the most common form of arthritis. Pain reduction and functional recovery are the key elements of the clinical management of OA. Current treatment guidelines recommend a combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. However, these are not always effective, with nearly 20% of patients not responding to any standard therapy, including joint replacement. The mechanisms of pain relief are not well understood and are complicated by the remarkably large placebo effect, and inter-individual variation. There is no objective criteria for predicting whether a patient will respond to a given treatment Duloxetine, an antidepressant drug, has proven effectiveness in various chronic pain syndromes including knee OA. The effect is however limited and only clinically relevant in around half of the trial patients. Importantly, it is currently unclear how and in whom duloxetine alleviates chronic pain. Advanced MRI techniques use strong magnetic fields and radio frequency signals to generate metabolic, anatomical and functional brain images (fMRI). Remifentanil is a potent analgesic agent whose analgesic effect has been well characterised in healthy volunteers, including fMRI studies showing modulation of activation of regions in the brain related to pain processing. Nevertheless, the neural correlates of remifentanil effects have not yet been investigated in chronic pain patients. The aim of this research is to use a combination of multimodal MRI, genetic and psychometric assessments to identify the mechanisms of pain relief in knee OA patients, following treatments with duloxetine and remifentanil, in a placebo controlled condition. With this we also aim to identify genetic, anatomical and brain activity predictors of treatment outcomes. The main hypotheses are:
- Analgesic response to duloxetine treatment can be predicted using a range of baseline brain imaging markers and QST.
- Analgesic response to duloxetine is mediated by modulation of neural networks underpinning emotional control.
- Duloxetine-induced changes in brain activation differ between responders and non-responders. This study is expected to last for two years. It is funded by Arthritis Research United Kingdom and forms part of a wider scientific investigation, using translational methodologies, to enhance the understanding of arthritis pain and to improve its treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Dec 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 5, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedNovember 27, 2017
May 1, 2017
1.5 years
August 4, 2014
November 23, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Reduction in nociceptive brain response after duloxetine
Baseline, week six
Neural network change (resting condition) induced by duloxetine
Baseline, week six
Predicting response to duloxetine from baseline fMRI metrics using univariate and multivariate analysis
Baseline, week six
Differences in brain response and network change between responders and non-responders
Baseline, week six
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Identification of QST and questionnaire parameters that predict response to duloxetine
Baseline, week six
Correlation between baseline CPM and TS with brain activity and connectivity changes
Baseline, week six
Group differences in brain activity and structure in pain processing, limbic and modulatory pathways changes following duloxetine treatment in comparison to placebo
Baseline, week six
Other Outcomes (1)
Determination of gene variations that can be linked with duloxetine treatment response
Baseline, week six
Study Arms (4)
Duloxetine
EXPERIMENTALDuloxetine 30 mg a day (2 weeks), then 60 mg a day (4weeks), taken by mouth
Placebo (for Duloxetine)
PLACEBO COMPARATORSugar pill: 1 capsule a day (2 weeks), then 2 capsules a day (4 weeks) taken by mouth
Remifentanil
EXPERIMENTALIntravenous infusion with maximum estimated plasma target of 1.0 ng/ml, during less than 20 minutes
Placebo (for Remifentanil)
PLACEBO COMPARATORIntravenous infusion of normal saline, during less than 20 min
Interventions
54 participants will be allocated for duloxetine treatment
27 participants will be allocated to Remifentanil infusion
Placebo comparator to Remifentanil treatment. 27 participants will be allocated to this arm
Sugar pill manufactured to mimic Duloxetine 30mg. 27 participants will be allocated to this intervention
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Radiographically defined OA knee changes with knee pain
- Must have self-reported knee pain
- Able to give informed consent
- Over 35 years old
- Male or female
- Females not pregnant or lactating and using effective contraception
You may not qualify if:
- People with any known contraindication to MRI like
- Intraocular metallic foreign bodies;
- Intracranial aneurysm clips;
- Cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators;
- Cochlear implants;
- People with a significant head tremor;
- People with potential metal foreign bodies due to previous accidents;
- Breastfeeding or pregnancy, confirmed by pregnancy test;
- People that are felt to be unfit for the MRI scan according to the judgement of medically qualified personnel, either on the research team, or the patient's clinical team. (eg. due to back pain, claustrophobia, acute sickness etc.) This includes patients with signs of impaired temperature regulation such as an extremely high fever;
- Patients with large tattoos, specifically in the head, neck or shoulder region;
- Persons that do not have the capacity to consent;
- Aged less than 35;
- Major medical, neurological and psychiatric co-morbidities;
- Other significant medical condition;
- Metallic agents embedded within the body (ie. Shrapnel, surgical pins);
- +16 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Nottinghamlead
- Arthritis Research UKcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Nottingham - School of Medicine - Radiological Sciences
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Reckziegel D, Bailey H, Cottam WJ, Tench CR, Mahajan RP, Walsh DA, Knaggs RD, Auer DP. Imaging pain relief in osteoarthritis (IPRO): protocol of a double-blind randomised controlled mechanistic study assessing pain relief and prediction of duloxetine treatment outcome. BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 26;7(6):e014013. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014013.
PMID: 28652290DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dorothee P Auer, PhD
University of Nottingham
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2014
First Posted
August 5, 2014
Study Start
December 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 27, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05