Alzheimer's Disease, Art and Garden
JAZ ART
Alzheimer's Disease and Healing Gardens: Study of the Cognitive and Psycho-behavioral Effects of an Artistic Dimension
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Gardens and art represent public spaces and support venues of interactions and emotions, seeking not only a variety of conversational themes but also various cognitive skills such as mnemonic skills. The cognitive and psycho-behavioral effects of art and the garden, jointly associated and made available to patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease, need to be evaluated. MAIN OBJECTIVE Delineate the psychological scaffolding virtues of art and garden on cognitive and emotional processes by means of interview analyses in Alzheimer patients and control subjects based on the " art, memory and life " garden. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES Adapt eco-psychosocial approaches of care management to Alzheimer patients:
- create assessment methods of:
- the therapeutic efficacy of the design of the " art, memory and life " garden,
- the perception of an artistic dimension in the living environment of those with Alzheimer's disease,
- establish:
- workshop applications using art and the garden for therapeutic purposes,
- general recommendations for the layout of the garden. PRIMARY ENDPOINT Quantitative data of discursive productions stemming from Interlocutory Logic (Trognon and Batt, 2007, 2010, 2011) for the analysis of interactive behaviors and the assessment of parameters including esthetic appraisals, well-being, mnemonic and emotional processes (frequency and nature of these processes) as well as spatio-temporal orientation. SECONDARY ENDPOINTS
- Scores obtained in standard neuropsychological tests, in particular to assess spatio-temporal orientation (Folstein MMSE),
- Scores obtained with the " MemoArtZ " tool (MAZ) to evaluate the memorization of artistic elements of the garden,
- Scores from the " General Esthetic Preference " (GEP) tool to evaluate the consistency of general esthetic appreciations,
- Score obtained with the specific mood assessment scale (CSDD) for subjects in group A,
- Score obtained with the specific assessment of emotional events scale (AES) for all subjects. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Open, monocentric, controlled (group of healthy control subjects) study. Population: 2 groups: Group A "Alzheimer group": patients with mild to severe stages of Alzheimer's disease: subgroup A1 "Alzheimer group hospitalized at the Paul Spillmann Centre (Centre Paul Spillmann, CPS)" (CHU de Nancy, France); subgroup A2 "Alzheimer group monitored at the Resource and Research Memory Centre (Centre Mémoire de Ressources et de Recherche, CMRR)" (CHU de Nancy, France) Group B "healthy control group": healthy volunteers Therapeutic fallouts of this study will benefit Alzheimer patients in terms of better care management, notably: i) by determining the design, conception and layout of the gardens destined to these patients, ii) by developing the introduction of an artistic dimension to the design of such healing gardens and in their living environment, iii) by establishing workshop application perspectives using the contemplation of works of art and the garden for therapeutic purposes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable alzheimer-disease
Started Jul 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable alzheimer-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 22, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2017
CompletedJuly 30, 2015
July 1, 2015
2.3 years
July 22, 2014
July 29, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparaison of the number of language acts in each category between AD and controls subjects
Each interaction between a subject and the psychologist is distributed into a interlocutory analysis table (Trognon and Batt, 2010 ; Batt, Trognon, Rivasseau-Jonveaux, Vernant and Jonveaux, 2014) where each utterance is noticed by its speech turn and its speech act. The second consists of a force (for example, an assertive force, as when I was eight, I loved the garden my parents owned) and a propositional content (for example, a feeling in its episodic context). Propositional content will be described according to its stimulus (for example, a kind of flower growing in the garden, a sculpture put into some place, etc.), to the interaction where it is produced and, more crucially, to the level of memory (procedural/semantics/episodics) it involves. These are the variables that will be then compared in using usual statistics between paired AD and control subjects at visit 1 and 2
visit2 ( 10 days maximum after visit 1)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Scores obtained in standard neuropsychological tests, in particular to assess spatio-temporal orientation (Folstein MMSE),
visit2 ( 10 days maximum after visit 1)
Scores obtained with the " MemoArtZ " tool (MAZ) to evaluate the memorization of artistic elements of the garden,
visit2 ( 10 days maximum after visit 1)
Scores from the " General Esthetic Preference " (GEP) tool to evaluate the consistency of general esthetic appreciations,
visit2 ( 10 days maximum after visit 1)
obtained with the specific mood assessment scale (CSDD) for subjects in group A
visit2 ( 10 days maximum after visit1)
Score obtained with the specific assessment of emotional events scale (AES) for all subjects.
visit2 ( 10 days maximum after visit 1)
Study Arms (2)
healthy controls group
EXPERIMENTALHealthy volunteers
Alzheimer subjects group
EXPERIMENTALGroup A "Alzheimer group": patients with mild to severe stages of Alzheimer's disease: subgroup A1 "Alzheimer group hospitalized at the Paul Spillmann Centre (Centre Paul Spillmann, CPS)" (CHU de Nancy, France); subgroup A2 "Alzheimer group monitored at the Resource and Research Memory Centre (Centre Mémoire de Ressources et de Recherche, CMRR)" (CHU de Nancy, France)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged 60 to 100 years
- able to walk independently, that is to say without recourse to aid, whether human or technical, except for a simple cane
- have never been in the garden " art, memory and life " of the Paul Spillmann Centre
- gave their written consent after receiving clear and intelligible written and oral information
- specific drug treatment for Alzheimer's disease, unchanged since at least 2 months (cholinesterase inhibitor and memantine)
You may not qualify if:
- lack of insurance coverage
- sensory deficit interfering with the designated tasks in the study
- phasic disorders interfering with the designated tasks in the study
- history of head trauma (with loss of consciousness)
- chronic alcoholism
- refusal or inability to obtain the informed written consent of the subject
- persons subject to a legal protection order
- other neurological or psychiatric disorders potentially affecting the assessment
- current or planned participation to other research involving neuropsychological evaluations and/or drug trial, up until the end of the current study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Nancy
Nancy, 54000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thérèse Rivasseau Jonveaux, MD
CHU NANCY
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 22, 2014
First Posted
August 4, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2017
Last Updated
July 30, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-07