Office-based Vision Therapy for Improving Reading and Attention in Children With Convergence Insufficiency
CITT-ART
Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial - Attention and Reading Trial (CITT-ART)
2 other identifiers
interventional
311
1 country
8
Brief Summary
CITT-ART is a multicenter study (8 locations around the United States) of 324 children ages 9 to \<14 years with symptomatic convergence insufficiency (CI). The purpose of this study is to see if office-based therapy for convergence insufficiency (CI) improves reading ability and attention. CI is an eye-teaming problem where the eyes would like to drift outward when reading or doing close work. When eyes drift out, double vision can happen. To prevent double vision one must use extra effort to keep the eyes from going out. This extra effort can cause symptoms that can interfere with reading and working comfortably at near. These symptoms often include eyestrain, blurred vision, headaches, double vision, and loss of place when reading or performing tasks at near. In a prior study we found that therapy improves these symptoms. In this study we are looking at whether the therapy improves reading and attention
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started May 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_3
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2020
CompletedMarch 17, 2020
March 1, 2020
3.2 years
July 31, 2014
March 16, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The change in the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-III (WIAT-III) reading comprehension score as measured after the completion of 16 weeks of assigned treatment (OBVAT or OBPT).
This test requires the examinee to respond to multiple-choice questions after having read passages independently.
After 16 weeks of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (5)
The change in the Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD Symptoms and Normal Behavior Scale (SWAN)
After 16 weeks of treatment
Gates-McGintie 4
After 16 weeks of treatment
d2 Test of Attention
After 16 weeks of treatment
Academic Behavior Survey (ABS)
After 16 weeks of treatment
Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM)
After 16 weeks of treatment
Study Arms (2)
Office-based verg/accomm therapy (OBVAT)
EXPERIMENTALOBVAT requires a participant to undergo a specific vision therapy regimen with 16 weekly, 60-minute in-office treatment sessions. Vision Therapists (O.D., M.D., Orthoptists, or specially-trained technicians) administer the therapy in the office. OBVAT procedures are then supplemented with various home therapy procedures
Office-based placebo therapy (OBPT)
PLACEBO COMPARATOROffice-based Placebo Therapy (OBPT) requires a participant to undergo a specific therapy regimen of 16 weekly, 60 minute, in-office treatment sessions. Vision therapists (optometrists, ophthalmologists, orthoptists, or specially-trained technicians) administer the therapy in the office. OBPT procedures are then supplemented with placebo home therapy procedures. The procedures for OBPT are designed with the intent of not providing a beneficial training effect on vergence, accommodation, saccadic accuracy, or visual attention beyond normal activities. However, the procedures are designed to simulate real vision therapy in such a way that it will be difficult for participants and parents to know that they have been assigned to the control group and thus are not receiving bonafide OBVAT
Interventions
The OBVAT program has been divided into 4 phases. Within each phase there are a number of categories such as gross convergence, vergence, and accommodation. The therapy procedures in each category have been arranged sequentially from easiest to most difficult
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 9 to less than 14 years
- Grades 3 through 8
- CI Symptom Survey (CISS) score greater or equal to 16
- Exophoria at near at least 4 prism diopters greater than at far
- Receded near point of convergence (NPC) of 6 cm or greater break
- Insufficient positive fusional vergence (PFV) at near (i.e., failing Sheard's or PFV less than or equal to 15 BO break)
- Best-corrected distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye
- Random dot stereopsis appreciation of 500 seconds of arc or better
- Wearing appropriate refractive correction (spectacles or contact lenses) for at least 2 weeks prior to final determination of eligibility for any of the following uncorrected refractive errors (based on cycloplegic refraction within prior 12 months)
- Myopia greater than -0.75D spherical equivalent (SE) in either eye
- Hyperopia greater than +2.00D SE in either eye
- SE anisometropia greater than 0.75D
- Astigmatism greater than 1.00D in either eye
- Correction for patients meeting above refractive error criteria must meet the following guidelines:
- SE anisometropia must be within 0. 75D of the full anisometropic correction
- +8 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Constant strabismus at distance or near
- Esophoria of greater than or equal to 2∆ at distance
- Vertical heterophoria greater than or equal to 2∆ at distance or near
- greater than or equal to 2 line interocular difference in best-corrected distance visual acuity
- Monocular near point of accommodation greater than 20 cm (accommodative amplitude less than 5D) in right eye
- Manifest or latent nystagmus
- Word Reading subtest score less than 80 on the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT-4)
- Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (KBIT-2) Matrices subtest score less than 70
- History of prior strabismus, intraocular, or refractive surgery
- CI previously treated with any form of office-based vergence/accommodative therapy or home-based vergence therapy (e.g., computerized vergence therapy)
- CI associated with head trauma or known disease of the brain
- Diseases known to affect accommodation, vergence, or ocular motility
- Inability to comprehend and/or perform any study-related test or therapy procedure
- Speech-language disorder (e.g., stuttering) that would interfere with interpretation of digital recordings of reading tests
- Significant hearing loss
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Salus Universitylead
- National Eye Institute (NEI)collaborator
- Marshall B. Ketchum Universitycollaborator
- Ohio State Universitycollaborator
- University of Alabama at Birminghamcollaborator
- State University of New York College of Optometrycollaborator
- Akron Children's Hospitalcollaborator
- Nova Southeastern Universitycollaborator
- Bascom Palmer Eye Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (8)
University of Alabama, Birmingham College of Optometry
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
Southern California College of Optometry Marshall B. Ketchum University
Fullerton, California, 90037, United States
NOVA Southeastern University College of Optometry
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33314, United States
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
State University of Optometry College of Optometry
New York, New York, 10036, United States
Akron Children's Hospital
Akron, Ohio, 44302, United States
Ohio State University College of Optometry
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Pennsylvania College of Optometry at Salus University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19141, United States
Related Publications (3)
CITT-ART Investigator Group. Effect of Vergence/Accommodative Therapy on Attention in Children with Convergence Insufficiency: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Optom Vis Sci. 2021 Mar 1;98(3):222-233. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001659.
PMID: 33771952DERIVEDScheiman M, Kulp MT, Cotter SA, Lawrenson JG, Wang L, Li T. Interventions for convergence insufficiency: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 2;12(12):CD006768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006768.pub3.
PMID: 33263359DERIVEDCITT-ART Investigator Group. Effect of Vergence/Accommodative Therapy on Reading in Children with Convergence Insufficiency: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Nov;96(11):836-849. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001442.
PMID: 31651592DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mitchell Scheiman, OD
Salus University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lynn MItchell, MAS
Ohio State University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dean of Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2014
First Posted
August 4, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 1, 2017
Study Completion
November 1, 2020
Last Updated
March 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03