Cerebral Oximetry for Carotid EEA
1 other identifier
observational
126
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aim oft he study is to compare two different devices for cerebral oximetry (FORE-SIGHTTM Monitor (CAS Medical Systems, Branford, Connecticut, USA and INVOSTM Somanetics, Troy, Michigan, USA) in patients undergoing surgical carotid thrombendarterectomy (cTEA) with crossclamped internal carotid artery (ACI). All procedures will be performed in regional anesthesia, therefore the patients will be awake and direct neurological examination during the procedure will be possible, giving information how the drop in cerebral saturation (measured with INVOS and FORESIGHT both on the same patient) correlates with any clinical symptoms. We expect to see a difference in the total drop and in the delay of the drop of cerebral oxygen saturation, making it possible to detect varieties in specificity and sensitivity of both devices compared to neurologic examination in the awake patient.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jul 2014
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedMay 20, 2015
July 1, 2014
1 year
July 24, 2014
May 19, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
absolute tissue saturation (StO2) measured with(FORE-SIGHTTM Monitor (CAS Medical Systems, Branford, Connecticut, USA and INVOSTM Somanetics, Troy, Michigan, USA)
The drop in StO2 will be compared to the occurrence of any clinical i.e. neurological symptoms during clamping o the carotid artery while cTEA is performed.
During the surgical procedure
Secondary Outcomes (2)
NSE
Before and after the surgery
S100B
Before and after the surgery
Other Outcomes (3)
Hemodynamic parameters
During the surgical procedure
Hemodynamic parameters
During the surgical procedure
Hemodynamic parameters
During the surgical procedure
Study Arms (1)
all patients
All patients will be measured throughout the procedure with both devices. There no further separation into groups as both sensors can be placed on the same patient.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
All patients scheduled for CTEA at the University Hospital Salzburg
You may qualify if:
- \- Patients with electively scheduled carotid thrombendarterectomy in regional anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- refusing participation
- age \<18 years
- pregnancy
- any contraindication to regional anesthesia or the use of NIRS
- participation in any other study affecting the study protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
LKH University Clinic Salzburg
Salzburg, Salzburg, 5020, Austria
Biospecimen
S100B and NSE blood samples taken twice, before and after the surgical procedure
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andreas Koköfer, M.D.
UK für Anästhesiologie, LKH Salzburg
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2014
First Posted
July 29, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 20, 2015
Record last verified: 2014-07