Defining Remission With Etanercept in AS in Real Life Clinical Practice
REACH AS
Defining Which Remission Criterion At Month 6 Predicts Remission At Month 12 In A Real Life Clinical Practice, In A Cohort Of Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients Treated With Etanercept (Enbrel (Registered))
2 other identifiers
observational
84
1 country
29
Brief Summary
Determine which remission criterion at Month 6 predicts remission at Month 12 the best.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Aug 2014
Typical duration for all trials
29 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 12, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 26, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 26, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 30, 2018
CompletedNovember 30, 2018
April 1, 2018
2.7 years
July 23, 2014
April 23, 2018
April 23, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) Partial Remission at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12
ASAS partial remission was defined as a score of less than or equal to (\<=) 2 for each of the 4 items including pain, function, participant global assessment (PGA) and inflammation. All these items were measured on a scale ranging from 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity.
Month 6 up to Month 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Remission Criteria at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12
ASAS 5/6 was defined as at least greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent relative improvement from baseline in at least 5 of the 6 following items: PGA, pain, function, inflammation, C - reactive protein (CRP) and spinal mobility. PGA, pain, function, inflammation all were measured on a scale ranging from 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity. CRP was measured in milligrams per liter (mg/L) and spinal mobility was measured in centimeter (cm) as calculated as the mean of right and left measurements of lateral spinal flexion.
Month 6 up to Month 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 60 Remission Criteria at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12
ASAS 60 was defined as at least \>= 60 percent relative improvement from baseline and an absolute change \>=2 scores in 3 of the 4 following items: PGA, pain, function, inflammation (where all were measured on a scale ranging from 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) and no worsening in the remaining 2 domains: CRP (mg/L) and spinal mobility (cm).
Month 6 up to Month 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 Remission Criteria at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12
ASAS 40 was defined as at least \>= 40 percent relative improvement from baseline and an absolute change \>=2 scores in 3 of the 4 following items: PGA, pain, function, inflammation (where all were measured on a scale ranging from 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) and no worsening in the remaining 2 domains: CRP (mg/L) and spinal mobility (cm).
Month 6 up to Month 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50 Remission Criteria at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12
BASDAI is a validated self-assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participant with AS by measuring participant's pain, discomfort and inflammation. Participant's pain, discomfort and inflammation was measured on a scale ranging from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher scores indicated higher degree of pain/discomfort/inflammation. The total BASDAI score was calculated as average of individual scores and ranged from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher score indicated high disease activity. BASDAI 50 remission was defined as at least \>=50 percent relative improvement from baseline in BASDAI total score.
Month 6 up to Month 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score Based on C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP) Remission Criteria at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12
ASDAS-CRP was based on 3 domains: BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global score (BAS-G) and CRP (in mg/L). BASDAI was used to measure disease activity by measuring participant's pain, discomfort and inflammation on a scale ranging from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher scores indicated higher degree of pain/discomfort/inflammation. The total BASDAI score was calculated as average of individual scores and ranged from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher score indicated lesser movement of participant due to AS. BAS-G was used to measure spinal pain on a scale ranging from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher scores indicated worsen health status. Scores from these 3 individual domains were averaged to calculate the ASDAS-CRP total scores. ASDAS-CRP remission was defined as having total ASDAS-CRP score of \<1.3 on a scale ranging from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity.
Month 6 up to Month 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score Based on Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ASDAS-ESR) Remission Criteria at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12
ASDAS-ESR was based on 3 domains: BASDAI, BAS-G and ESR (in millimeter per hour). BASDAI was used to measure disease activity by measuring participant's pain, discomfort and inflammation on a scale ranging from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher scores indicated higher degree of pain/discomfort/inflammation. The total BASDAI score was calculated as average of individual scores and ranged from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher score indicated lesser movement of participant due to AS. BAS-G was used to measure spinal pain on a scale ranging from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher scores indicated worsen health status. Scores from these 3 individual domains were averaged to calculate the ASDAS- ESR total scores. ASDAS- ESR remission was defined as having total ASDAS- ESR score of \<1.3 on a scale ranging from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity.
Month 6 up to Month 12
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) Partial Remission Criteria at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Remission Criteria at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 60 Remission Criteria at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 Remission Criteria at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50 Remission Criteria at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Etanercept First
Adults patients with AS receiving Etanercept as first biologic, according to prevailing reimbursement criteria in Belgium
Etanercept second
Adults patients with AS receiving Etanercept as second biologic, according to prevailing reimbursement criteria in Belgium
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients visiting Rheumatologist for which the decision has been taken to prescribe Etanercept as first or second line
You may qualify if:
- Patients with AS who start treatment with Etanercept according to prevailing reimbursement criteria and dosing in line with SmPC.
- First cohort: Etanercept is the first biological product prescribed
- Second cohort: Etanercept is the second biological product prescribed
- Capable of understanding and willing to provide signed and dated written, voluntary informed consent before any protocol-specific procedures are performed.
- years of age or older at time of consent
- Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient (or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.
You may not qualify if:
- \. History of or current psychiatric illness that would interfere with the subject's ability to comply with protocol requirements or to give informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pfizerlead
Study Sites (29)
CHU Brugmann - Site Horta
Brussels, Bruxelles-capitale, Région de, 1020, Belgium
ASZ Aalst
Aalst, 9300, Belgium
Algemeen Stedelijk Ziekenhuis
Aalst, B-9300, Belgium
Onze Lieve Vrouw Ziekenhuis Aalst
Aalst, B-9300, Belgium
Onze Lieve Vrouw Ziekenhuis
Aalst, B-9300, Belgium
Private Practice
Braine-l'Alleud, B-1420, Belgium
CHIREC
Brussels, 1040, Belgium
CHU St-Pierre
Brussels, B-1000, Belgium
Private Practice
Champion, B-5020, Belgium
AZ Sint Blasius
Dendermonde, 9200, Belgium
Private Practice
Flemalles Haute, B-4400, Belgium
Biomedical Research Institute/ Department of Rheumatology
Genk, 3600, Belgium
Private Practice Rheumatology
Genk, 3600, Belgium
ReumaClinic
Genk, 3600, Belgium
Reumatologie Associatie
Genk, 3600, Belgium
Private Practice
Genk, B-3600, Belgium
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
Grand Hopital de Charleroi
Gilly, B-6060, Belgium
Private Practice
Grand-Manil, 5030, Belgium
AZ Groeninge Campus Sint Maarten
Kortrijk, Belgium
CHU de Liège
Liège, B-4000, Belgium
Private Practice of Dr. Geert Ghyselen
Lokeren, 9160, Belgium
Louisastraat 18
Mechelen, 2800, Belgium
Hôpital Sainte Thérèse/ Department of Rheumatology
Montignies-sur-Sambre, 6061, Belgium
Rheumatology
Ostend, 8400, Belgium
Office of Maenaut Kristien
Schoten, B-2900, Belgium
Rheumatology
Sijsele-Damme, 8340, Belgium
Sint-Andries Ziekenhuis
Tielt, B-8700, Belgium
Cliniques Universitaires UCL de Mont-Godinne
Yvoir, 5530, Belgium
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
- Organization
- Pfizer, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Pfizer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2014
First Posted
July 29, 2014
Study Start
August 12, 2014
Primary Completion
April 26, 2017
Study Completion
April 26, 2017
Last Updated
November 30, 2018
Results First Posted
November 30, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04