NCT02202850

Brief Summary

Determine which remission criterion at Month 6 predicts remission at Month 12 the best.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
84

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2014

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

29 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 23, 2014

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 29, 2014

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 12, 2014

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 26, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 26, 2017

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 30, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

November 30, 2018

Status Verified

April 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

July 23, 2014

Results QC Date

April 23, 2018

Last Update Submit

April 23, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) Partial Remission at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12

    ASAS partial remission was defined as a score of less than or equal to (\<=) 2 for each of the 4 items including pain, function, participant global assessment (PGA) and inflammation. All these items were measured on a scale ranging from 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity.

    Month 6 up to Month 12

  • Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Remission Criteria at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12

    ASAS 5/6 was defined as at least greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent relative improvement from baseline in at least 5 of the 6 following items: PGA, pain, function, inflammation, C - reactive protein (CRP) and spinal mobility. PGA, pain, function, inflammation all were measured on a scale ranging from 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity. CRP was measured in milligrams per liter (mg/L) and spinal mobility was measured in centimeter (cm) as calculated as the mean of right and left measurements of lateral spinal flexion.

    Month 6 up to Month 12

  • Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 60 Remission Criteria at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12

    ASAS 60 was defined as at least \>= 60 percent relative improvement from baseline and an absolute change \>=2 scores in 3 of the 4 following items: PGA, pain, function, inflammation (where all were measured on a scale ranging from 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) and no worsening in the remaining 2 domains: CRP (mg/L) and spinal mobility (cm).

    Month 6 up to Month 12

  • Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 Remission Criteria at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12

    ASAS 40 was defined as at least \>= 40 percent relative improvement from baseline and an absolute change \>=2 scores in 3 of the 4 following items: PGA, pain, function, inflammation (where all were measured on a scale ranging from 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= high disease activity) and no worsening in the remaining 2 domains: CRP (mg/L) and spinal mobility (cm).

    Month 6 up to Month 12

  • Percentage of Participants Who Achieved the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50 Remission Criteria at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12

    BASDAI is a validated self-assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participant with AS by measuring participant's pain, discomfort and inflammation. Participant's pain, discomfort and inflammation was measured on a scale ranging from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher scores indicated higher degree of pain/discomfort/inflammation. The total BASDAI score was calculated as average of individual scores and ranged from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher score indicated high disease activity. BASDAI 50 remission was defined as at least \>=50 percent relative improvement from baseline in BASDAI total score.

    Month 6 up to Month 12

  • Percentage of Participants Who Achieved the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score Based on C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP) Remission Criteria at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12

    ASDAS-CRP was based on 3 domains: BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global score (BAS-G) and CRP (in mg/L). BASDAI was used to measure disease activity by measuring participant's pain, discomfort and inflammation on a scale ranging from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher scores indicated higher degree of pain/discomfort/inflammation. The total BASDAI score was calculated as average of individual scores and ranged from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher score indicated lesser movement of participant due to AS. BAS-G was used to measure spinal pain on a scale ranging from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher scores indicated worsen health status. Scores from these 3 individual domains were averaged to calculate the ASDAS-CRP total scores. ASDAS-CRP remission was defined as having total ASDAS-CRP score of \<1.3 on a scale ranging from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity.

    Month 6 up to Month 12

  • Percentage of Participants Who Achieved the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score Based on Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ASDAS-ESR) Remission Criteria at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12

    ASDAS-ESR was based on 3 domains: BASDAI, BAS-G and ESR (in millimeter per hour). BASDAI was used to measure disease activity by measuring participant's pain, discomfort and inflammation on a scale ranging from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher scores indicated higher degree of pain/discomfort/inflammation. The total BASDAI score was calculated as average of individual scores and ranged from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher score indicated lesser movement of participant due to AS. BAS-G was used to measure spinal pain on a scale ranging from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher scores indicated worsen health status. Scores from these 3 individual domains were averaged to calculate the ASDAS- ESR total scores. ASDAS- ESR remission was defined as having total ASDAS- ESR score of \<1.3 on a scale ranging from 0= none to 10= severe, where higher scores indicated higher disease activity.

    Month 6 up to Month 12

Secondary Outcomes (16)

  • Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) Partial Remission Criteria at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12

    Month 3, 6, 9 and 12

  • Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 5/6 Remission Criteria at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12

    Month 3, 6, 9 and 12

  • Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 60 Remission Criteria at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12

    Month 3, 6, 9 and 12

  • Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 Remission Criteria at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12

    Month 3, 6, 9 and 12

  • Percentage of Participants Who Achieved the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50 Remission Criteria at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12

    Month 3, 6, 9 and 12

  • +11 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Etanercept First

Adults patients with AS receiving Etanercept as first biologic, according to prevailing reimbursement criteria in Belgium

Drug: etanercept

Etanercept second

Adults patients with AS receiving Etanercept as second biologic, according to prevailing reimbursement criteria in Belgium

Drug: etanercept

Interventions

etanercept 1 x 50 mg/week or 2 x 25mg/week

Etanercept First

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients visiting Rheumatologist for which the decision has been taken to prescribe Etanercept as first or second line

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with AS who start treatment with Etanercept according to prevailing reimbursement criteria and dosing in line with SmPC.
  • First cohort: Etanercept is the first biological product prescribed
  • Second cohort: Etanercept is the second biological product prescribed
  • Capable of understanding and willing to provide signed and dated written, voluntary informed consent before any protocol-specific procedures are performed.
  • years of age or older at time of consent
  • Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient (or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • \. History of or current psychiatric illness that would interfere with the subject's ability to comply with protocol requirements or to give informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (29)

CHU Brugmann - Site Horta

Brussels, Bruxelles-capitale, Région de, 1020, Belgium

Location

ASZ Aalst

Aalst, 9300, Belgium

Location

Algemeen Stedelijk Ziekenhuis

Aalst, B-9300, Belgium

Location

Onze Lieve Vrouw Ziekenhuis Aalst

Aalst, B-9300, Belgium

Location

Onze Lieve Vrouw Ziekenhuis

Aalst, B-9300, Belgium

Location

Private Practice

Braine-l'Alleud, B-1420, Belgium

Location

CHIREC

Brussels, 1040, Belgium

Location

CHU St-Pierre

Brussels, B-1000, Belgium

Location

Private Practice

Champion, B-5020, Belgium

Location

AZ Sint Blasius

Dendermonde, 9200, Belgium

Location

Private Practice

Flemalles Haute, B-4400, Belgium

Location

Biomedical Research Institute/ Department of Rheumatology

Genk, 3600, Belgium

Location

Private Practice Rheumatology

Genk, 3600, Belgium

Location

ReumaClinic

Genk, 3600, Belgium

Location

Reumatologie Associatie

Genk, 3600, Belgium

Location

Private Practice

Genk, B-3600, Belgium

Location

Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent

Ghent, 9000, Belgium

Location

Grand Hopital de Charleroi

Gilly, B-6060, Belgium

Location

Private Practice

Grand-Manil, 5030, Belgium

Location

AZ Groeninge Campus Sint Maarten

Kortrijk, Belgium

Location

CHU de Liège

Liège, B-4000, Belgium

Location

Private Practice of Dr. Geert Ghyselen

Lokeren, 9160, Belgium

Location

Louisastraat 18

Mechelen, 2800, Belgium

Location

Hôpital Sainte Thérèse/ Department of Rheumatology

Montignies-sur-Sambre, 6061, Belgium

Location

Rheumatology

Ostend, 8400, Belgium

Location

Office of Maenaut Kristien

Schoten, B-2900, Belgium

Location

Rheumatology

Sijsele-Damme, 8340, Belgium

Location

Sint-Andries Ziekenhuis

Tielt, B-8700, Belgium

Location

Cliniques Universitaires UCL de Mont-Godinne

Yvoir, 5530, Belgium

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spondylitis, Ankylosing

Interventions

Etanercept

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Axial SpondyloarthritisSpondylarthropathiesSpondylarthritisSpondylitisSpinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesAnkylosisJoint DiseasesArthritis

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Immunoglobulin Fc FragmentsImmunoglobulin FragmentsPeptide FragmentsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsImmunoglobulin Constant RegionsImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulinsReceptors, Tumor Necrosis FactorReceptors, CytokineReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, Cell SurfaceMembrane Proteins

Results Point of Contact

Title
Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
Organization
Pfizer, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Pfizer CT.gov Call Center

    Pfizer

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2014

First Posted

July 29, 2014

Study Start

August 12, 2014

Primary Completion

April 26, 2017

Study Completion

April 26, 2017

Last Updated

November 30, 2018

Results First Posted

November 30, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-04

Locations