Study With Etanercept Focusing on Remission and Predictability of Remission in Real Life Clinical Practice
REACH RA
Defining Which Remission Criterion At Month 6 Predicts Remission At Month 12 In A Real Life Clinical Practice, In A Cohort Of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated With Etanercept (Enbrel (Registered))
2 other identifiers
observational
157
1 country
35
Brief Summary
Defining Which Remission Criterion at Month 6 Predicts Remission at Month 12 in a Real Life Clinical Practice, in a Cohort of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Etanercept
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Aug 2014
Typical duration for all trials
35 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 15, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 12, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 24, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 24, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 3, 2018
CompletedDecember 3, 2018
April 1, 2018
2.7 years
July 15, 2014
April 23, 2018
April 23, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) Less Than (<) 2.6 at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12
DAS28 was a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28 was calculated from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender/painful joint count (TJC) using 28 joints count, C-reactive protein (CRP) (milligrams per liter \[mg/L\]) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour \[mm/hr\]) levels and patient global assessment (PGA) of disease activity on a 0-100 mm scale (scores ranging from 0 mm \[very well\] to 100 mm \[extremely bad\], higher scores indicated worst health condition). DAS28 score range from 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity). DAS28 \[less than or equal to\] \<=3.2 implied low disease activity and greater than (\>) 3.2 to \<=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 less than (\<) 2.6 implied remission.
Month 6 up to Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 3.3 at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12
The SDAI was the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, physician (evaluator) global assessment of disease (EGA) and PGA (assessed on a 0 mm \[very well\] to 10 mm \[extremely bad\] scale; higher scores indicated worst health condition) and CRP (mg/dL). SDAI total score ranged from 0 (no disease activity) to 86 (maximal disease activity), where higher scores represents higher disease activity. SDAI \>3.4 to 11 implied low disease activity, \>11 to 26 implied moderate disease activity, \>26 implied high disease activity and \<=3.3 implied disease remission.
Month 6 up to Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <=2.8 at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12
The CDAI was the numerical sum of four outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, EGA and PGA (assessed on a 0 mm \[very well\] to 10 mm \[extremely bad\] scale; higher scores indicated worst health condition). CDAI total score ranged from 0-76 with higher scores indicating increased disease activity.
Month 6 up to Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Remission at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12 Based on American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) (Clinical Studies) Boolean Criterion
The ACR/EULAR Boolean-based remission rate measured the severity of disease. A participant was considered as having achieved the Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission at a visit if all of the following 4 criteria were met at that visit: TJC (in 28 joints) \<=1; SJC (in 28 joints) \<=1; CRP\<=1 mg/dl; PGA\<=1 (assessed on a 0 mm \[very well\] to 10 mm \[extremely bad\] scale; higher scores indicated worst health condition).
Month 6 up to Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Remission at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12 Based on American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) (Clinical Practice) Boolean Criterion
The ACR/EULAR Boolean-based remission rate measured the severity of disease. A participant was considered as having achieved the Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission at a visit if all of the following 4 criteria were met at that visit: TJC (in 28 joints) \<=1; SJC (in 28 joints) \<=1 and PGA\<=1 (assessed on a 0 mm \[very well\] to 10 mm \[extremely bad\] scale; higher scores indicated worst health condition).
Month 6 up to Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Remission Based on Seven-Joint Ultrasound (US7) Measurements at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12
A participant was in remission based on US7: if US7 synovitis sum score in grey-scale Ultrasonography (GSUS) =0, Power Doppler Ultrasonography (PDUS) =0 and erosion sum score in GSUS=0. US7 score is musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MKUS) composite scoring system which combined soft tissue lesions (synovitis) and destructive processes (erosions) in a single scoring system. US7 score included MKUS examination of the following joints of the more clinically affected side: wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) II and III, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) II and III, metatarsophalangeal (MTP) II and V. The joints were examined by GSUS and PDUS for synovitis. Synovitis in GSUS and PDUS was analyzed on a scale of 0-3 (GSUS: 0=no synovitis, 3=severe synovitis; higher score=more synovitis); (PDUS: 0=no intraarticular color signal, 3 = \>=50% of the intraarticular area filled with color signals). Erosions in GSUS and PDUS were calculated on a binary basis 0 and 1 where 0=no remission and remission=1.
Month 6 up to Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Remission Based on Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) in Combination With Seven-Joint Ultrasound (US7) Measurement at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12
Remission based on DAS28 + US7: DAS28 \<2.6 and US7 synovitis sum score in GSUS=0, PDUS=0 and US7 erosion sum score in GSUS=0. DAS28: SJC + TJC in 28 joints count + CRP(mg/L) or ESR(mm/hr) levels and PGA on 0-100 mm scale (0 mm \[very well\] to 100 mm \[extremely bad\], higher scores indicated worst health condition). U7 Remission: US7 synovitis sum score in GSUS=0, PDUS=0 and erosion sum score in GSUS=0. US7 score is MKUS composite scoring system which combined soft tissue lesions(synovitis) and destructive processes(erosions) in single scoring system. US7 score included MKUS examination of given joints: wrist, MCP II and III, PIP II and III, MTP II and V. Joints were examined by GSUS and PDUS for synovitis on scale of 0-3 (GSUS: 0=no synovitis, 3=severe synovitis; higher score=more synovitis); (PDUS: 0=no intraarticular color signal, 3 = \>=50% of intraarticular area filled with color signals). Erosions in GSUS and PDUS were calculated on binary basis 0 (no remission) and 1 (remission).
Month 6 up to Month 12
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) <2.6 at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) <=3.3 at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <=2.8 at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Remission Based on American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) (Clinical Studies) Boolean Criterion at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Remission Based on American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) (Clinical Practice) Boolean Criterion at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
Month 3, 6, 9 and 12
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Etanercept First
Adult patients with RA who receive etanercept as first biologic, according to prevailing Belgian reimbursement criteria
Etanercept second
Adult patients who receive etanercept as second biologic, according to prevailing Belgian reimbursement criteria
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patients presenting with moderate-to-severe RA in daily clinical practice
You may qualify if:
- Patients with active RA who start treatment with etanercept according to the prevailing reimbursement criteria and dosing in line with the SmPC.
- First cohort: Etanercept is the first biological product prescribed.
- Second cohort: Etanercept is the second biological product prescribed.
- Capable of understanding and willing to provide signed and dated written, voluntary informed consent before any protocol-specific procedures are performed.
- Eighteen (18) years of age or older at time of consent.
You may not qualify if:
- \. History of or current psychiatric illness that would interfere with the subject's ability to comply with protocol requirements or to give informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pfizerlead
Study Sites (35)
CHU Dinant Godinne
Yvoir, Namur, 5530, Belgium
ASZ Aalst
Aalst, 9300, Belgium
Algemeen Stedelijk Ziekenhuis
Aalst, B-9300, Belgium
Onze Lieve Vrouw Ziekenhuis Aalst
Aalst, B-9300, Belgium
Onze Lieve Vrouw Ziekenhuis
Aalst, B-9300, Belgium
St. Lucas ZH
Assebroeck, 8310, Belgium
St-Lucas Ziekenhuis
Assebroek, B-8310, Belgium
Centre Hospitalier Universitarie Brugmann
Brussels, 1020, Belgium
CHIREC
Brussels, 1040, Belgium
Private Practice
Champion, B-5020, Belgium
AZ Sint Blasius
Dendermonde, 9200, Belgium
AZ Alma
Eeklo, 9900, Belgium
Biomedical Research Institute/ Department of Rheumatology
Genk, 3600, Belgium
Private Practice Rheumatology
Genk, 3600, Belgium
ReumaClinic
Genk, 3600, Belgium
Reumatologie Associatie
Genk, 3600, Belgium
Private Practice
Genk, B-3600, Belgium
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
GHdC
Gilly, B-6060, Belgium
Private Practice
Grand-Manil, 5030, Belgium
AZ Groeninge Campus Sint Maarten
Kortrijk, Belgium
CHU Tivoli
La Louvière, 7100, Belgium
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sart Tilman, Department of Rheumatology
Liège, 4000, Belgium
CHU Sart Tilman/ Department of Rheumatology
Liège, 4000, Belgium
CHU
Liège, Belgium
Louisastraat 18
Mechelen, 2800, Belgium
CHU Ambroise Pare
Mons, B-7000, Belgium
Hôpital Saintethérèse
Montigny Sur Sambre, 6061, Belgium
ISPPC de Charleroi
Montigny-le-Tilleul, 6110, Belgium
AZ Damiaan
Ostend, 8400, Belgium
Office of Maenaut Kristien
Schoten, B-2900, Belgium
Sint-Andries Ziekenhuis
Tielt, B-8700, Belgium
CH Peltzer-Tourelle
Verviers, B-4800, Belgium
Avenue G Therasse 1
Yvoir, 5530, Belgium
Cliniques Universitaires UCL de Mont-Godinne
Yvoir, 5530, Belgium
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
- Organization
- Pfizer, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Pfizer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2014
First Posted
July 29, 2014
Study Start
August 12, 2014
Primary Completion
April 24, 2017
Study Completion
April 24, 2017
Last Updated
December 3, 2018
Results First Posted
December 3, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04