NCT02201914

Brief Summary

Poor ovarian response to stimulation in IVF cycles is a challenging and frustrating condition, due to its poor prognosis in terms of chances of pregnancy and live births. Various ovarian stimulation regimens have been tried to overcome these obstacles. A simple approach is increase the dose of the gonadotropin administration, but the results in terms of pregnancy rate are very low Another commonly used stimulation regimen is the microdose GnRH agonist protocol, which takes advantage of the initial rise in endogenous gonadotropins that follows the agonist administration in the early follicular phase and subsequently prevents a premature LH surge, with fewer cycle cancellations. However, their application in poor responders, even if in small doses and for a limited period, has been questioned as they may cause oversuppression of ovarian function, leading to a prolonged cycle and increased treatment costs without improving the outcomes. Recently, GnRH antagonists were introduced in ART treatment. They are effective in preventing a premature LH surge and allow for a more natural recruitment of follicles in the follicular phase in a non-suppressed ovary, offering a potential alternative in the treatment of these patients. However, randomized studies evaluating the efficacy of this regimen in poor responders did not show any improvements in pregnancy rates. Current approach have included the addition of oral agents such us clomiphene citrate (CC) to gonadotropins. Some authors have investigated the role of CC in addition to low dose of gonadotropins in mild stimulation regimen, demonstrating that, despite a small number of retrieved oocytes, good quality embryos were produced with a subsequent improvement in the fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate. The only study that evaluate the efficacy of CC in addition to high doses of gonadotropins in poor responders showed improving in number of retrieved oocytes, transferred embryos and biochemical pregnancy; however, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate remained low and showed no measurable increase. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the CC as an adjunctive to a high dose of gonadotropins in cycles with antagonist protocols with the microdose GnRH agonist and flexible antagonist protocols in women who responded poorly to ovarian stimulation, to determine whether this protocol may improve IVF outcomes, offering a valid alternative in poor responder patients treatment.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
250

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2014

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2014

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 22, 2014

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 28, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2014

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

July 28, 2014

Status Verified

July 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

July 22, 2014

Last Update Submit

July 24, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical pregnancy rate

    Time Frame: until 12th gestational week

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • implantation rate

    Time Frame: until 12th gestational week

Study Arms (3)

Clomiphene citrate

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Clomiphene citrate

Daily FSH and LH plus Cetrorelix

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Daily FSH and LH plus Cetrorelix

Triptorelin plus daily FSH and LH

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Triptorelin plus daily FSH anh LH

Interventions

patients receive clomiphene citrate 100 mg daily starting on day 2 for 5 days and 450 IU recombinant FSH and 225 IU recombinant LH daily starting on day 5; Cetrorelix 0,25 mg was administered daily when one or more follicle reached 13-14 mm in diameter until the hCG injection

Clomiphene citrate

Women receive an initial daily dose of 450 IU recombinant FSH and 225 IU recombinant LH starting on day 3; Cetrorelix 0,25 mg was administered daily when one or more follicle reached 13-14 mm in diameter until the hCG injection.

Daily FSH and LH plus Cetrorelix

women receive short-acting Triptorelin 0,05 mg daily starting on day 1 until the hCG injection and 450 IU recombinant FSH and 225 IU recombinant LH daily starting on day 2.

Triptorelin plus daily FSH and LH

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 44 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • poor responders in a previous IVF cycle at least 3 months before at our center and undergoing a new IVF attempt with at least two of the following criteria : I) age \> 40 years old; II) basal follicular stimulation hormone (FSH) \> 12 mIU/ml; III) three or fewer oocytes retrieved in the previous IVF cycle; IV) low estradiol levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration (\< 1500 pmol/ml).

You may not qualify if:

  • body mass index \> 30
  • biochemical and ultrasound evidence of polycystic ovary syndrome
  • stage III-IV endometriosis
  • inflammatory or autoimmune disorders
  • metabolic disease
  • infertility medications within the past two months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Bioroma

Rome, Rome, 00197, Italy

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Interventions

ClomiphenecetrorelixTriptorelin Pamoate

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

StilbenesBenzylidene CompoundsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsGonadotropin-Releasing HormonePituitary Hormone-Releasing HormonesHypothalamic HormonesPeptide HormonesHormonesHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsNeuropeptidesPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsOligopeptidesNerve Tissue ProteinsProteins

Central Study Contacts

Mauro Schimberni, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2014

First Posted

July 28, 2014

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion

October 1, 2014

Study Completion

November 1, 2014

Last Updated

July 28, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-07

Locations