Stylet vs No Stylet During EBUS TBNA
Stylet Versus no Stylet in Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)
1 other identifier
interventional
121
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This research study compares two ways to biopsy lymph nodes in the chest using endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration" (EBUS-TNBA). During a EBUS-TBNA procedure, the patient is sedated, and a flexible camera and ultrasound probe is inserted through the mouth into the large airways of the chest, allowing us to see (via ultrasound) and biopsy the lymph nodes in the chest. The purpose of this research study is to determine if the EBUS-TBNA procedure can be made simpler. In today's practice, the biopsy needle has two parts, 1) the needle itself and 2) an inner stylet that runs through the middle of the needle. Because many other biopsy needles (such as the needles used in breast biopsy and different types of lung biopsy needles) do not use an inner stylet, the investigators do not think the use of a stylet is necessary. If this step can be safely eliminated without decreasing the effectiveness of the procedure, this could shorten the procedure (saving time). This study is deigned to formally test the hypothesis that a stylet is not necessary in EBUS-TBNA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedDecember 15, 2016
December 1, 2016
1.3 years
June 5, 2014
December 14, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic agreement (percentage of samples that have the same diagnosis)
The main outcome is the agreement (concordance) between the pathological diagnosis obtained by preforming EBUS with a stylet with EBUS without a stylet. Each patient will receive both techniques on each lymph node. We will then compare the diagnostic reached by each technique, and calculate the percentage of the time these techniques result in the same diagnosis.
At time of biopsy
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Pneumothorax rate (percentage of procedures that result in a pneumothorax)
1 week post-procedure
Bleeding rate (% of procedures that have significant bleeding)
1 week post-procedure
Hospital Admission (% of procedures that result in unanticipated admission to the hospital)
1 week post-procedure
Study Arms (1)
EBUS patients
OTHERAll patients in our study are in the same arm, as each patient serves as their own internal control. More specifically, each enrolled patient will receive both traditional EBUS (with the usage of stylet) and experimental EBUS (EBUS without a stylet) at each lymph node that is included in the experimental analysis.
Interventions
the patient will receive both conventional ebus with the stylet and experimental ebus (without the stylet). The two techniques will then be compared to each other on a per lymph node basis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients \>18 years old and capable of informed consent refereed for EBUS-TBNA at our institution.
You may not qualify if:
- Standard contraindications to EBUS (coagulopathy, anti-platlet/anti-coagulant use, clinical instability)
- Pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21218, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2014
First Posted
July 28, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 15, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-12