The Effect of Perineal Massage in Childbirth
2 other identifiers
interventional
284
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective To examine the effects of perineal massage applied during the action of birth on the frequency of episiotomy procedures, perineal tearing and the duration of the second stage of birth. Methods The present study was a randomized controlled experimental. Women (284 women) were informed on the study and provided their written consent. 10-minute perineal massage with glycerine was applied to the women in the test group for 4 times during the first stage and 1 time in the second stage of birth. The women in the control group received the routine care procedure at the clinic. Results According to the study findings, 31% of the women in the test group and 69.7% of the women in the control group were made subject to episiotomy (p\<0.05). In the test and control group 9.2%, 2.4% of the women developed spontaneous perineal laceration (p\>0.05). The average duration of the action of birth was 25.33 minutes in the test group and 28.18 minutes in the control group (p\<0.05). Conclusion The study results indicate that perineal massage applied during the action of birth decreased the rate of episiotomy procedure and shortened the duration of the second stage of birth.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2014
CompletedAugust 27, 2014
August 1, 2014
1.3 years
July 23, 2014
August 26, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Episiotomy procedures
until completed the second stage of labour, about from 30 min to 24 h
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Length of the second stage of labour
until completed the second stage of labour, about from 30 min to 24 h
Study Arms (1)
Perineal Massage & Control
EXPERIMENTALPerineal Massage every 30 min, a 10 min 4 times in the first stage of labour, 1 times in the second stage of labour. Control routine care procedure at the clinic.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- With no pregnancy-related complications diagnosed during pregnancy,
- No definitive indication for C-section,
- Satisfying the pregnancy week in terms of the fetal dimensions,
- At the 37th-42nd gestation week,
- Applying to have her first or second birth,
- With no systemic condition,
- With head presentation,
- At the latent phase of the first stage of birth with a dilatation under 4 cm and effacement below 50%,
- That have provided written consent specifying their voluntariness in participating in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- With pregnancy-related complications diagnosed during pregnancy,
- Definitive indication for C-section,
- No satisfying the pregnancy week in terms of the fetal dimensions,
- At the \<37th- \>42nd gestation week,
- With systemic condition,
- With no head presentation,
- At the latent phase of the first stage of birth with a dilatation above 4 cm
- No have provided written consent specifying their voluntariness in participating in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cumhuriyet University
Sivas, 58140, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Demirel G, Golbasi Z. Effect of perineal massage on the rate of episiotomy and perineal tearing. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Nov;131(2):183-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.048. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
PMID: 26410801DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2014
First Posted
July 28, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2011
Last Updated
August 27, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-08