Study Stopped
ODEN trial stopped due to low enrollment \& to focus on the PRESERVE Trial.
ODEN Trial: Option vs. Denali IVC Filters
ODEN
Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Denali and Option Inferior Vena Cava Filters
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This research study is a prospective randomized trial evaluating the relative safety of two inferior vena cava (IVC) filters used to prevent the migration of potentially dangerous deadly blood clots from the legs to the lung in patients who cannot take blood thinners. All eligible patients will have been ordered to have a IVC filter placed by their primary medical team and filters will be placed in these patients whether or not they wish to participate in this trial as part of standard of care. The investigators will follow up with patients 30 days after IVC filter placement and ask them to come back for filter removal if medically appropriate. If removal is not medically appropriate in 30 days, the investigators will attempt to schedule removal every 30 days after initial placement. Primary outcome measures will be IVC filter complications such as filter penetration through the IVC wall and into other organs, filter tilt, filter migration, filter fracture and clots formed within the filter. All of these are reported complications of all IVC filters. The research also aims to improve the standard of care for IVC filter patient follow up as the FDA and Society of Interventional Radiology recommend that IVC filters be removed as soon as it is safe to do so. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that there is no significant difference in efficacy and complication rate between the Option and the Denali filter.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 27, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 13, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 27, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 12, 2019
CompletedSeptember 12, 2019
August 1, 2019
3.9 years
July 23, 2014
April 16, 2019
August 22, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
IVC: Filter Penetration
Using imaging analysis, patients will resume their standard care as normal but be encouraged to come back in 30 days for imaging followup and removal. other than that we will look at all available CT and xray imaging that clearly shows the filter and IVC vessel walls. We will count how many participants have penetration of the IVC greater than 3mm and the number of days since placement at imaging timepoints. The number of struts or hooks per filter with penetration will also be recorded.
in dwelling time in 1 day after filter insertion up to 3 years.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Computerized Tomography (CT) Studies With IVC Penetration
0-1733 days
Number of Participants With IVC Filter Migration
30 days
IVC Filter Tilt
0-365 days post placement until project closure or patient endpoint reached
IVC Filter Fracture
30 days
IVC Filter Clot
30 days
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Denali
EXPERIMENTALDenali IVC Filter
Option
EXPERIMENTALOption Elite IVC Filter
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients scheduled for IVC filter placement at UCSF Moffitt, Mission Bay and Mount Zion hospitals Interventional Radiology
You may not qualify if:
- Necessity of permanent IVC filter.
- Genetic or physical abnormalities of the inferior vena cava
- Circumstances that in the opinion of the primary investigator, patient would be a poor candidate either due to complications in medical condition or lack of ability for follow up.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UCSF Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Related Publications (1)
Woodcock A, Campbell I, Collins JV, Hanson P, Harvey J, Corris P, Johnston ID. Bronchoscopy and infection control. Lancet. 1989 Jul 29;2(8657):270-1. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90451-0. No abstract available.
PMID: 2569071BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The ODEN trial was initially powered to observe differences between the two filter types after 75 of each filter were to be placed. Due to the opening of the PRESERVE trial and slightly lower than expected enrollment, the trial was terminated early.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Maureen Kohi, MD
- Organization
- University of California, San Francisco, Interventional Radiology
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maureen P Kohi, M.D.
University of California, San Francisco
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- analysis of the imaging data will be masked and filter type and PHI will be redacted so the radiologist assessor will not know which patients receive either the option or denali..
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2014
First Posted
July 28, 2014
Study Start
May 27, 2014
Primary Completion
April 13, 2018
Study Completion
April 27, 2018
Last Updated
September 12, 2019
Results First Posted
September 12, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08