Comparison of MEOPA + Paracetamol Versus Morphine Treatment in Acute Coronary Syndrome Analgesia.
SCADOLII
Analgesia of Acute Coronary Syndromes With ST-segment Elevation in a Pre-hospital Setting. Randomized Non-inferiority Trial of the Association MEOPA + Paracetamol Versus Morphine.
2 other identifiers
interventional
680
2 countries
40
Brief Summary
In the management of acute coronary syndromes with ST-segment elevation (STEMI), early analgesia reduces the effects of hyperadrenalism which increases the size of myocardial infarction. In order to reduce pain intensity, the recommendations advocate emergency use of morphine. In STEMI patients, other analgesic treatments could provide analgesia that is at least as effective as morphine. The equimolar oxygen/nitrous oxide mixture (MEOPA) is widely used in emergency medicine and has minor secondary effects that are very rapidly reversible when inhalation is discontinued. Used in association with paracetamol, it could be an at least equally effective alternative to the use of morphine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Nov 2014
Typical duration for phase_4
40 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 22, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 23, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedFebruary 5, 2018
February 1, 2018
2.2 years
July 22, 2014
February 2, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effective analgesia (NRS score≤ 3) at 30 minutes after the start of analgesia
The primary outcome measure is effective analgesia, defined by the consensus conference as an NRS score ≤ 3 at 30 minutes after the start of analgesia.
30 minutes after randomisation.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Adverse event
all 5 minutes during 30 minutes
NRS distribution
30 minutes after randomization
Effective analgesia
all 5 minutes during 30 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Morphine
ACTIVE COMPARATORMorphine group: administration of morphine will start with a 0.05 mg/kg bolus followed by reinjection of 2 mg every 5 minutes until effective analgesia is obtained, defined as NRS ≤ 3.
MEOPA and paracetamol
EXPERIMENTALThe patient will be equipped with a facemask delivering MEOPA.The gas flow received by the patient is adapted to his/her ventilation. During the same time, an intravenous injection of 1 g paracetamol will be administered.
Interventions
The patient will be equipped with a facemask after he/she has been informed. The facemask is adapted to the patient. The patient breathes normally in the mask which is held in place by a member of the SMUR team who has received previous training in use of MEOPA. The gas flow received by the patient is adapted to his/her ventilation.
Bolus of 2 mg intravenously if EN = 4 or 5 and 3 mg bolus if EN\> 6 followed by reinjection of 2mg every 5 minutes until effective analgesia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with STEMI \< 12 h treated before hospital admission and pain ≥ 4 on the numerical rating scale.
You may not qualify if:
- Acute severe hemodynamic, respiratory or neurological failure
- Heart failure: Killip class III and IV
- Known allergy to morphine or nitrous oxide
- Patient who has already received morphine or MEOPA before the arrival of the hospital team during the 4 hours preceding the pre-hospital intervention
- Contraindications to nitrous oxide
- Patient unable to assess pain intensity on the numerical rating scale
- Patient under legal guardianship
- Pregnancy
- Patient transported by air ambulance
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (40)
Centre Hospitalier d'Agen
Agen, France
Centre Hospitalier Jean Minjoz
Besançon, France
CHU Avicenne
Bobigny, France
Hôpital Pellegrin
Bordeaux, France
Centre Hospitalier Bourg-en-Bresse
Bourg-en-Bresse, France
Centre Hospitalier de Chambéry
Chambéry, France
Centre Hospitalier Louis Pasteur
Chartres, France
Centre Hospitalier Chateauroux
Châteauroux, France
CHU d'Estaing
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Centre Hospitalier Beaujon
Clichy, France
Centre Hospitalier Alpes Léman
Contamine-sur-Arve, France
Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien
Corbeil-Essonnes, France
Centre Hospitalier Dijon
Dijon, France
Centre Hospitalier du Val d'Ariège
Foix, France
Centre Hospitalier Raymond Poincaré
Garches, France
Centre Hospitalier de Grenoble
Grenoble, France
Centre Hospitalier Départemental La Roche/Yon
La Roche-sur-Yon, France
CHRU Lille
Lille, France
CHU Dupuytren
Limoges, France
Centre Hospitalier Edouard Herriot
Lyon, France
Centre Hospitalier de la Timone
Marseille, France
Centre Hospitalier Marc Jacquet
Melun, France
CHR Bon Secours
Metz, France
CHRU Montpellier
Montpellier, France
CHU Nancy
Nancy, France
CHU Nantes
Nantes, France
Centre Hospitalier de Nice
Nice, France
Centre Hospitalier Necker
Paris, France
Centre Hospitalier Pitié-Salpétrière
Paris, France
Groupe hospitamier Lariboisière-Fernand Widal-St-Louis
Paris, France
CHU Poitiers
Poitiers, France
Centre Hospitalier René Dubos
Pontoise, France
Centre Hospitalier Annecy-Gennevois
Pringy, France
Centre Hospitalier Comminges Pyrénées
Saint-Gaudens, France
Centre Hospitalier Poulon la Seyne-sur-mer
Toulon, France
CHU Toulouse
Toulouse, France
CHRU Tours
Tours, France
Centre Hospitalier de Valence
Valence, France
Centre Hospitalier Lucien Hussel
Vienne, France
CHU Félix Guyon
Saint-Denis, Reunion
Related Publications (6)
Danchin N, Puymirat E, Aissaoui N, Adavane S, Durand E. [Epidemiology of acute coronary syndromes in France and in Europe]. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2010 Dec;59 Suppl 2:S37-41. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3928(10)70008-1. French.
PMID: 21237321BACKGROUNDMyocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2000 Sep;21(18):1502-13. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2305.
PMID: 10973764BACKGROUNDTask Force for Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of European Society of Cardiology; Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardissino D, Boersma E, Budaj A, Fernandez-Aviles F, Fox KA, Hasdai D, Ohman EM, Wallentin L, Wijns W. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2007 Jul;28(13):1598-660. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm161. Epub 2007 Jun 14. No abstract available.
PMID: 17569677BACKGROUNDVan de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Crea F, Falk V, Filippatos G, Fox K, Huber K, Kastrati A, Rosengren A, Steg PG, Tubaro M, Verheugt F, Weidinger F, Weis M; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(23):2909-45. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn416. Epub 2008 Nov 12. No abstract available.
PMID: 19004841BACKGROUNDCanadian Cardiovascular Society; American Academy of Family Physicians; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association; Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Halasyamani LK, Hochman JS, Krumholz HM, Lamas GA, Mullany CJ, Pearle DL, Sloan MA, Smith SC Jr, Anbe DT, Kushner FG, Ornato JP, Pearle DL, Sloan MA, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Halperin JL, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 15;51(2):210-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.001. No abstract available.
PMID: 18191746BACKGROUNDCharpentier S, Galinski M, Bounes V, Ricard-Hibon A, El-Khoury C, Elbaz M, Ageron FX, Manzo-Silberman S, Soulat L, Lapostolle F, Gerard A, Bregeaud D, Bongard V, Bonnefoy-Cudraz E; SCADOL II investigators. Nitrous oxide/oxygen plus acetaminophen versus morphine in ST elevation myocardial infarction: open-label, cluster-randomized, non-inferiority study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 May 12;28(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00731-y.
PMID: 32398160DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sandrine Charpentier, PH,MD
University Hospital, Toulouse
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 22, 2014
First Posted
July 23, 2014
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2017
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 5, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02