A Comparison of Post-Sternotomy Dressings
1 other identifier
interventional
351
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to determine which of three types of dressings, a dry sterile dressing, a metallic silver dressing or an ionic silver dressing provided better patient outcomes for the post-sternotomy cardiac surgery patient population. In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, the hypothesis was that subjects who received either of the silver impregnated dressings would have better outcomes (better wound healing, less discomfort, and less incidence of infection). Investigators also evaluated dressing factors such as adherence, time for application and ease of use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 27, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 23, 2014
CompletedJuly 23, 2014
March 1, 2014
2.1 years
March 27, 2014
July 21, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Wound Healing
The primary outcome measure in this study was wound healing, defined as the degree of wound approximation, skin integrity, exudate, and presence/absence of necrotic tissue, assessed at postoperative day 5 or day of discharge. Wound approximation was assessed as total, partial (less than 2 centimeters of superficial separation), moderate (greater than 2 centimeters of superficial separation), or dehisced (complete separation of layers). Skin integrity was evaluated as normal (pink, no redness), inflamed, (heat, redness, swelling), or macerated within a 2.5 centimeter border of the incision. Exudate quality was assessed as purulent, blood, serosanguinous, or serous. Presence or absence of necrotic tissue was noted.
5 days postoperatively or day of discharge, whichever came first
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient Comfort
5 days postoperatively or day of hospital discharge, whichever came first
Other Outcomes (2)
Dressing Factors
5 days postoperatively or at day of discharge, whichever came first
Sternal Wound Infection
30 days postoperatively
Study Arms (3)
Dry Sterile Dressing
OTHERSubjects in this study arm received a dry sterile dressing (Primapore®, Smith \& Nephew), a one-piece, peel-and-stick, non-transparent dressing. This dressing is the standard of care at the study facility for this population and was left in place for either 24 to 48 hours.
Metallic Silver Dressing
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects in this arm received a metallic silver dressing (Acticoat Post-Op®, Smith \& Nephew), a one-piece, peel-and-stick and non-transparent dressing. This dressing is an absorbent postoperative dressing consisting of a nanocrystalline silver-coated polyurethane layer, a white polyurethane foam and an adhesive coated waterproof polyurethane film layer. Acticoat Post-Op may be left in place over a wound for up to 7 days. The manufacturers note that the product should not be used in patients with known silver allergies and that it may cause transient discoloration of the skin.
Ionic Silver Dressing
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects in this arm received an ionic silver dressing (Dermanet Ag®, DeRoyal), a semi-transparent dressing that includes silver, alginate, and maltodextrin. The dressing was cut to fit the incision and then covered with a transparent dressing (Transseal®, DeRoyal). This dressing should not be used on patients with known sensitivity to alginates (a seaweed based component).
Interventions
Described in Arm Description.
Described in Arm Description.
Described in Arm Description.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult (at least 21 years of age) inpatients awaiting cardiac surgery or outpatients seen in the pre-surgical testing area prior to admission for surgery
- Having surgery at the study setting
- English-speaking
- Able to understand and give consent
- Had the approval of their cardiothoracic surgeon to participate
- Had no known sensitivity to silver
- Had no known sensitivity to alginates
You may not qualify if:
- Known sensitivity to silver
- Known sensitivity to alginates
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Carilion Cliniclead
- DeRoyal Industries, Inc.collaborator
- Smith & Nephew, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital
Roanoke, Virginia, 24014, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cathy D. Jennings, DNP
Carilion Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 27, 2014
First Posted
July 23, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2010
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
August 1, 2012
Last Updated
July 23, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03