NCT02190500

Brief Summary

The primary goal of this project is to carry out a trial comparing pre-hospital diagnosis and treatment of patients with stroke symptoms using a Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) with subsequent transfer to a Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC) Emergency Department (ED) for further management, to standard pre-hospital triage and transport by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to a CSC ED for evaluation and treatment (Standard Management-SM).

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
1,038

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2014

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 10, 2014

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 15, 2014

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2014

Completed
7.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2021

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

March 17, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

7.3 years

First QC Date

July 10, 2014

Last Update Submit

March 16, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

stroketpaemergency medical serviceemsmobilect scan

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (uw-mRS) from baseline to 90 days

    Comparing patients found eligible for tPA (based on a blinded review of the patient's chart, regardless of whether they were treated or not) on MSU weeks compared to SM weeks. With a sample size of 693 total tPA-eligible patients (446 MSU and 247 SM patients, assuming 10% lost to follow-up), the study will have 80% power with a 0.05 Type I error rate to detect a difference between groups of 0.09 in the mean uw-mRS using a two-sample t-test.At total of 693 tPA treated patients will allow 85% power to detect a 25 min decrease in time to treatment between the two groups using a one- sided alpha level of 0.05

    90 days (+/- 10 days) from date of enrollment

  • Agreement between on scene Vascular Neurologist vs. Remote (Telemedicine) Vascular Neurologist

    The agreement between a VN remotely assessing a suspected stroke patient via TM in the MSU and in-person assessment by a VN in the MSU will be assessed by using the Kappa statistic. We anticipate that the estimated sample size of 162 is needed to allow us 90 % power to detect 90% agreement between the in-person assessment and the TM.

    up to 4.5 hours from symptom onset

  • Cost Effectiveness (N.B. The BEST-MSU study including measurement of heatlhcare utilization is funded by PCORI. The cost-effectiveness measures are not covered by PCORI funding and will be reported separately)

    Cost Effectiveness as measured by average patient QALYs, post-stroke healthcare utilization, incremental fixed costs associated with MSU and the per-patient incremental fixed cost due the ambulance outfitting, CT, other equipment, telemedicine technology and staffing requirements.

    up to 1 year from date of enrollment

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • 90 day Modified Rankin Score

    90 days (+/- 10 days) from date of enrollment

  • 90 day Modified Rankin Score

    90 days (+/- 10 days) from date of enrollment

  • Time from symptom onset to tPA treatment

    up to 4.5 hours from symptom onset

  • Time from symptom onset to Endovascular treatment

    up to 6 hours from symptom onset

  • Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality

    up to hospital discharge

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Mobile Stroke Unit Management

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Acute ischemic stroke patients treated in the Mobile Stroke Unit

Other: Mobile Stroke Unit Management

Standard Management

NO INTERVENTION

Acute ischemic stroke patients receiving standard management

Interventions

Mobile Stroke Unit is a standard 12' Houston Fire Department ambulance equipped with point of care lab, CT scanner and staffed by a Vascular Neurologist, Registered Nurse with acute stroke and research experience, CT Technician and a Registered EMT-P. The MSU is dispatched in coordination with Houston, Bellaire and West University fire department/emergency medical services.

Mobile Stroke Unit Management

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Last seen normal within 4hr 30 min of symptom onset
  • History and physical/neurological examination consistent with acute stroke
  • Informed consent obtained from patient (if competent) or legal representative.

You may not qualify if:

  • None

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Navi BB, Wang M, Yamal JM, Rajan SS, Czap AL, Parker SA, Nour M, Spokoyny I, Mir S, Fink ME, Willey JZ, Jones WJ, Grotta JC. Potential Missed Opportunities to Administer Intravenous Thrombolysis to Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2026 Jan 29. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.054326. Online ahead of print.

  • Grotta JC, Yamal JM, Parker SA, Rajan SS, Gonzales NR, Jones WJ, Alexandrov AW, Navi BB, Nour M, Spokoyny I, Mackey J, Persse D, Jacob AP, Wang M, Singh N, Alexandrov AV, Fink ME, Saver JL, English J, Barazangi N, Bratina PL, Gonzalez M, Schimpf BD, Ackerson K, Sherman C, Lerario M, Mir S, Im J, Willey JZ, Chiu D, Eisshofer M, Miller J, Ornelas D, Rhudy JP, Brown KM, Villareal BM, Gausche-Hill M, Bosson N, Gilbert G, Collins SQ, Silnes K, Volpi J, Misra V, McCarthy J, Flanagan T, Rao CPV, Kass JS, Griffin L, Rangel-Gutierrez N, Lechuga E, Stephenson J, Phan K, Sanders Y, Noser EA, Bowry R. Prospective, Multicenter, Controlled Trial of Mobile Stroke Units. N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 9;385(11):971-981. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2103879.

  • Yamal JM, Parker SA, Jacob AP, Rajan SS, Bowry R, Bratina P, Wang M, Nour M, Mackey J, Collins S, Jones W, Schimpf B, Ornelas D, Spokoyny I, Im JF, Gilbert G, Eisshofer M, Grotta JC. Successful conduct of an acute stroke clinical trial during COVID. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 15;16(1):e0243603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243603. eCollection 2021.

  • Czap AL, Singh N, Bowry R, Jagolino-Cole A, Parker SA, Phan K, Wang M, Sheth SA, Rajan SS, Yamal JM, Grotta JC. Mobile Stroke Unit Computed Tomography Angiography Substantially Shortens Door-to-Puncture Time. Stroke. 2020 May;51(5):1613-1615. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028626. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

  • Bowry R, Parker SA, Yamal JM, Hwang H, Appana S, Rangel-Gutierrez N, Wu TC, Rajan SS, Grotta JC. Time to Decision and Treatment With tPA (Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator) Using Telemedicine Versus an Onboard Neurologist on a Mobile Stroke Unit. Stroke. 2018 Jun;49(6):1528-1530. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020585. Epub 2018 May 2.

  • Yamal JM, Rajan SS, Parker SA, Jacob AP, Gonzalez MO, Gonzales NR, Bowry R, Barreto AD, Wu TC, Lairson DR, Persse D, Tilley BC, Chiu D, Suarez JI, Jones WJ, Alexandrov A, Grotta JC. Benefits of stroke treatment delivered using a mobile stroke unit trial. Int J Stroke. 2018 Apr;13(3):321-327. doi: 10.1177/1747493017711950. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

  • Wu TC, Parker SA, Jagolino A, Yamal JM, Bowry R, Thomas A, Yu A, Grotta JC. Telemedicine Can Replace the Neurologist on a Mobile Stroke Unit. Stroke. 2017 Feb;48(2):493-496. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015363. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ischemic StrokeStroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • James C Grotta, MD

    Memorial Hermann

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Alternating week assignment to groups. Entry criteria adjudicated by masked investigator. Primary outcome also by masked investigator.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2014

First Posted

July 15, 2014

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion

December 1, 2021

Study Completion

August 1, 2023

Last Updated

March 17, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Locations