BEnefits of Stroke Treatment Delivered Using a Mobile Stroke Unit
BEST-MSU
1 other identifier
interventional
1,038
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary goal of this project is to carry out a trial comparing pre-hospital diagnosis and treatment of patients with stroke symptoms using a Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) with subsequent transfer to a Comprehensive Stroke Center (CSC) Emergency Department (ED) for further management, to standard pre-hospital triage and transport by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to a CSC ED for evaluation and treatment (Standard Management-SM).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Aug 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 15, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2023
CompletedMarch 17, 2023
March 1, 2023
7.3 years
July 10, 2014
March 16, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (uw-mRS) from baseline to 90 days
Comparing patients found eligible for tPA (based on a blinded review of the patient's chart, regardless of whether they were treated or not) on MSU weeks compared to SM weeks. With a sample size of 693 total tPA-eligible patients (446 MSU and 247 SM patients, assuming 10% lost to follow-up), the study will have 80% power with a 0.05 Type I error rate to detect a difference between groups of 0.09 in the mean uw-mRS using a two-sample t-test.At total of 693 tPA treated patients will allow 85% power to detect a 25 min decrease in time to treatment between the two groups using a one- sided alpha level of 0.05
90 days (+/- 10 days) from date of enrollment
Agreement between on scene Vascular Neurologist vs. Remote (Telemedicine) Vascular Neurologist
The agreement between a VN remotely assessing a suspected stroke patient via TM in the MSU and in-person assessment by a VN in the MSU will be assessed by using the Kappa statistic. We anticipate that the estimated sample size of 162 is needed to allow us 90 % power to detect 90% agreement between the in-person assessment and the TM.
up to 4.5 hours from symptom onset
Cost Effectiveness (N.B. The BEST-MSU study including measurement of heatlhcare utilization is funded by PCORI. The cost-effectiveness measures are not covered by PCORI funding and will be reported separately)
Cost Effectiveness as measured by average patient QALYs, post-stroke healthcare utilization, incremental fixed costs associated with MSU and the per-patient incremental fixed cost due the ambulance outfitting, CT, other equipment, telemedicine technology and staffing requirements.
up to 1 year from date of enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (6)
90 day Modified Rankin Score
90 days (+/- 10 days) from date of enrollment
90 day Modified Rankin Score
90 days (+/- 10 days) from date of enrollment
Time from symptom onset to tPA treatment
up to 4.5 hours from symptom onset
Time from symptom onset to Endovascular treatment
up to 6 hours from symptom onset
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality
up to hospital discharge
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Mobile Stroke Unit Management
ACTIVE COMPARATORAcute ischemic stroke patients treated in the Mobile Stroke Unit
Standard Management
NO INTERVENTIONAcute ischemic stroke patients receiving standard management
Interventions
Mobile Stroke Unit is a standard 12' Houston Fire Department ambulance equipped with point of care lab, CT scanner and staffed by a Vascular Neurologist, Registered Nurse with acute stroke and research experience, CT Technician and a Registered EMT-P. The MSU is dispatched in coordination with Houston, Bellaire and West University fire department/emergency medical services.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Last seen normal within 4hr 30 min of symptom onset
- History and physical/neurological examination consistent with acute stroke
- Informed consent obtained from patient (if competent) or legal representative.
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Memorial Hermann Health Systemlead
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houstoncollaborator
- Baylor College of Medicinecollaborator
- CHI St. Luke's Health, Texascollaborator
- City of Houston Fire Departmentcollaborator
- The Methodist Hospital Research Institutecollaborator
- West University Fire Departmentcollaborator
- City of Bellaire Fire Departmentcollaborator
- Ben Taub Hospitalcollaborator
- Harris Healthcollaborator
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (7)
Navi BB, Wang M, Yamal JM, Rajan SS, Czap AL, Parker SA, Nour M, Spokoyny I, Mir S, Fink ME, Willey JZ, Jones WJ, Grotta JC. Potential Missed Opportunities to Administer Intravenous Thrombolysis to Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2026 Jan 29. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.054326. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41608799DERIVEDGrotta JC, Yamal JM, Parker SA, Rajan SS, Gonzales NR, Jones WJ, Alexandrov AW, Navi BB, Nour M, Spokoyny I, Mackey J, Persse D, Jacob AP, Wang M, Singh N, Alexandrov AV, Fink ME, Saver JL, English J, Barazangi N, Bratina PL, Gonzalez M, Schimpf BD, Ackerson K, Sherman C, Lerario M, Mir S, Im J, Willey JZ, Chiu D, Eisshofer M, Miller J, Ornelas D, Rhudy JP, Brown KM, Villareal BM, Gausche-Hill M, Bosson N, Gilbert G, Collins SQ, Silnes K, Volpi J, Misra V, McCarthy J, Flanagan T, Rao CPV, Kass JS, Griffin L, Rangel-Gutierrez N, Lechuga E, Stephenson J, Phan K, Sanders Y, Noser EA, Bowry R. Prospective, Multicenter, Controlled Trial of Mobile Stroke Units. N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 9;385(11):971-981. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2103879.
PMID: 34496173DERIVEDYamal JM, Parker SA, Jacob AP, Rajan SS, Bowry R, Bratina P, Wang M, Nour M, Mackey J, Collins S, Jones W, Schimpf B, Ornelas D, Spokoyny I, Im JF, Gilbert G, Eisshofer M, Grotta JC. Successful conduct of an acute stroke clinical trial during COVID. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 15;16(1):e0243603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243603. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 33449944DERIVEDCzap AL, Singh N, Bowry R, Jagolino-Cole A, Parker SA, Phan K, Wang M, Sheth SA, Rajan SS, Yamal JM, Grotta JC. Mobile Stroke Unit Computed Tomography Angiography Substantially Shortens Door-to-Puncture Time. Stroke. 2020 May;51(5):1613-1615. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028626. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
PMID: 32295510DERIVEDBowry R, Parker SA, Yamal JM, Hwang H, Appana S, Rangel-Gutierrez N, Wu TC, Rajan SS, Grotta JC. Time to Decision and Treatment With tPA (Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator) Using Telemedicine Versus an Onboard Neurologist on a Mobile Stroke Unit. Stroke. 2018 Jun;49(6):1528-1530. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020585. Epub 2018 May 2.
PMID: 29720439DERIVEDYamal JM, Rajan SS, Parker SA, Jacob AP, Gonzalez MO, Gonzales NR, Bowry R, Barreto AD, Wu TC, Lairson DR, Persse D, Tilley BC, Chiu D, Suarez JI, Jones WJ, Alexandrov A, Grotta JC. Benefits of stroke treatment delivered using a mobile stroke unit trial. Int J Stroke. 2018 Apr;13(3):321-327. doi: 10.1177/1747493017711950. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
PMID: 28612680DERIVEDWu TC, Parker SA, Jagolino A, Yamal JM, Bowry R, Thomas A, Yu A, Grotta JC. Telemedicine Can Replace the Neurologist on a Mobile Stroke Unit. Stroke. 2017 Feb;48(2):493-496. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015363. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
PMID: 28082671DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James C Grotta, MD
Memorial Hermann
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Alternating week assignment to groups. Entry criteria adjudicated by masked investigator. Primary outcome also by masked investigator.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 10, 2014
First Posted
July 15, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2021
Study Completion
August 1, 2023
Last Updated
March 17, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03