Modified Angled Tube vs. Conventional Angled Tube in Double-lumen Endotracheal Tube Intubation
Comparison of Individually Modified Angled Tube and Conventional Angled Tube in Double-lumen Endotracheal Tube Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
108
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators are trying to compare the individually modified-angled tube and the conventional-angled tube in ease of double lumen endotracheal tube insertion and the incidence of related postoperative complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 6, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 15, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedFebruary 24, 2015
February 1, 2015
6 months
July 6, 2014
February 22, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The time taken to intubate a double-lumen tube
The time taken to insert the tube begins when the laryngoscope passes the patient's lips and ends when the tube passes the vocal cords
within 60 sec
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The number of attempts needed for successful intubation
Intubation
The time taken for the first attempt of intubation
within 60 sec
Postoperative sore throat, hoarseness or dysphagia
30 minutes and 24hours after extubation
Other Outcomes (2)
Hemodynamic change
1, 3 and 5 min after intubation
Intubation difficulty scale score
At intubation
Study Arms (2)
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntubating a manufacturer-provided-angled double-lumen tube (=Conventional-angled group,"MallinckrodtTM endotracheal tube", Covidien)
Tube angle modification
EXPERIMENTALThe angle of the double lumen tube(MallinckrodeTM endotracheal tube) is modified individually.At sniffing position, the distal tip of the tube is placed at the patient's cricoid cartilage level and the tube is bent at the intersection point of the two airway axes (oropharyngeal axis and tracheal axis) with an angle between the two axes.
Interventions
At sniffing position, the distal tip of a double-lumen tube is located at the patient's cricoid cartilage level and then the tube is bent at the intersection point of oral axis and the pharyngolaryngeal axis with an angle between the two axes.
Inserting a manufacturer-provided conventional-angled tube
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects undergoing thoracic surgery under one lung ventilation
- Subjects older than 20 yrs who can give written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Those who need rapid sequence intubation
- Those with cervical spinal disease (cervical spinal injury, rheumatoid arthritis with atlantoaxial subluxation)
- Those with oropharyngeal obstructive disease (including tumor, foreign body)
- Those who are expected prolonged intubation after surgery
- Those who are pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 135-710, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Min JJ, Lee JH, Kang SH, Kim E, Lee SM, Cho JH, Kim HK. The Fast and Easy Way for Double-Lumen Tube Intubation: Individual Angle-Modification. PLoS One. 2016 Aug 18;11(8):e0161434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161434. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27537372DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jong Hwan Lee, MD,PhD
Samsung Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 6, 2014
First Posted
July 15, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 24, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-02