Early PREdiction of Severe Sepsis I (ExPRES-Sepsis I) Study
ExPRES
Early Prediction of Severe Sepsis (ExPRESSepsis) Study
1 other identifier
observational
401
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Between 6 and 16% of patients presenting to hospital emergency departments have infections, with half of these having signs of systemic inflammation (known as 'sepsis'). A second issue is that, at time of presentation, it can be difficult to determine who has inflammation as a result of infection and who does not. Some of the patients with infections will deteriorate to organ failure ('severe sepsis') including failure of the heart and blood vessels to maintain normal blood pressure ('septic shock'). Septic shock as arguably the most dangerous form of severe sepsis is associated with a significant mortality, which can be reduced by early intervention. However identifying those patients who are at high risk of deteriorating to septic shock can be difficult on initial presentation to hospital, and thus these patients risk being 'triaged' to an inappropriate level of care and/or missing the crucial early interventions which can modify mortality. Equally failure to identify which patients have underlying infections can lead to potential inappropriate targeting of antibiotics. Existing clinical and laboratory tests are often unable to accurately identify those patients with infection, and those who are likely to deteriorate to severe sepsis and septic shock. Investigators in this group have recently identified several signatures of immune system activation which predict those patients who are likely to deteriorate, and which patients with suspected infection subsequently have this confirmed. Such tests would have major benefits for the management of patients with early suspected infection and sepsis if they can be translated into a test usable in everyday clinical practice. This study aims to determine the prevalence of these markers in a cohort of patients admitted with suspected sepsis, and their predictive ability for developing established septic shock. From this investigators aim to derive an optimal test, to be tested in a validation cohort (ExPRES-Sepsis II) which will be suitable for everyday clinical practice, and thus take the next step towards developing a market-ready test. Study hypothesis is: Measurement of markers of immune activation will allow i) Risk stratification for deterioration into severe sepsis ii) Risk stratification for death amongst patients presenting with sepsis iii) Identification of patients with confirmed sepsis
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2014
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 7, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2016
CompletedOctober 26, 2016
July 1, 2014
2 years
July 7, 2014
October 25, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Development of septic shock
Within first 72 hours
Confirmation of suspected infection
within first 72 hours
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Hospital outcome (lived/died)
Within first 72 hours
Time to septic shock onset
Within the first 72 hours
Death from sepsis
Within first 72 hours
Organ dysfunction, total and individual organs as determined by SOFA score
within first 72 hours
subsequent admission to critical care
within first 72 hours
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Cohort 1
Patients with sepsis syndrome, without criteria for severe sepsis/septic shock. These patients are recruited from the emergency department.
Cohort 2
Patients with community acquired sepsis syndrome REQUIRING critical care admission due to severity of sepsis. These patients are recruited from the critical care areas (ICU/HDU).
Cohort 3
Patients without sepsis syndrome. Age and gender matched to cohort 1, and recruited from Emergency Department.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients in the initial 12 hours following presentation to hospital with suspected sepsis, i.e. patients with signs of systemic inflammation (i.e. meeting criteria for SIRS) where the treating clinician takes microbial samples and/or starts empiric antibiotics.
You may qualify if:
- Age \>16 (\>18 in England)
- SIRS criteria met (2 or more of White Cell Count (WCC) \>11 or \<4, Heart Rate (HR) \>90, Respiratory Rate (RR) \>20 or temp \>38 or \<36oC)
- Clinical suspicion of sepsis (cultures taken or antibiotics started)
- Enrolled within 12 hours of hospital admission
You may not qualify if:
- Acute pancreatitis
- Septic shock at time of enrolment
- Severe organ failure at time of enrolment (immediate requirement for ventilation, vasopressor or renal replacement therapy)
- Haematological malignancy
- Recent chemotherapy (past 2 weeks)
- Myelodysplastic syndromes
- Known neutropaenia
- HIV infection
- Pregnancy
- Blood transfusion \>4 units in past week
- Oral Corticosteroids for \>24 hours prior to enrolment
- Decision not for active therapy/ palliative care at admission
- Lacking in capacity to consent and nearest relative/welfare guardian not available for consultation and proxy consent (Scotland only)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Edinburghlead
- Technology Strategy Board, United Kingdomcollaborator
- Becton, Dickinson and Companycollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, United Kingdom
St Thomas' Hospital
London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
Royal Victoria Infirmary
Newcastle, NE1 4LP, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Shankar-Hari M, Datta D, Wilson J, Assi V, Stephen J, Weir CJ, Rennie J, Antonelli J, Bateman A, Felton JM, Warner N, Judge K, Keenan J, Wang A, Burpee T, Brown AK, Lewis SM, Mare T, Roy AI, Wright J, Hulme G, Dimmick I, Gray A, Rossi AG, Simpson AJ, Conway Morris A, Walsh TS. Early PREdiction of sepsis using leukocyte surface biomarkers: the ExPRES-sepsis cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Nov;44(11):1836-1848. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5389-0. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
PMID: 30291379DERIVEDDatta D, Conway Morris A, Antonelli J, Warner N, Brown KA, Wright J, Simpson AJ, Rennie J, Hulme G, Lewis SM, Mare TA, Cookson S, Weir CJ, Dimmick I, Keenan J, Rossi AG, Shankar-Hari M, Walsh TS; ExPRES Sepsis Investigators. Early PREdiction of Severe Sepsis (ExPRES-Sepsis) study: protocol for an observational derivation study to discover potential leucocyte cell surface biomarkers. BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 1;6(8):e011335. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011335.
PMID: 27481622DERIVED
Biospecimen
Samples of serum and plasma will be stored frozen.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tim S Walsh, MD
NHS Lothian/University of Edinburgh
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Wright, MD
Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Manu Shankar-Hari, MD
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew Conway Morris, MD
University of Cambridge
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Simpson, MD
Newcastle University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alasdair Gray, MD
NHS Lothian/University of Edinburgh
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 7, 2014
First Posted
July 14, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
January 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 26, 2016
Record last verified: 2014-07