NCT02185001

Brief Summary

Background: The forces involved in a patella dislocation event can cause significant collateral damage involving the articular cartilage of the patella femoral joint. As a result, prevention of recurrent patella dislocation and the associated disability and morbidity has generated significant interest in the orthopedic community. Historically, nonoperative treatment for first time patella dislocation has been problematic due to high redislocation rates. Nonoperative protocols generally involve bracing and/or immobilization, followed by physical therapy (1). Surgical approaches to recurrent patella dislocation, both soft tissue and boney realignment operations, have also had mixed results, including low success rates, associated complications, and variable rates of return to functional activity (2,3,4). This study is intended to compare the outcomes of a relatively low-risk Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) direct repair procedure to conservative treatment. Methods/Design: This study is designed as a two arm randomized prospective trial. Approximately fifty subjects will be randomly assigned to either a surgical or non-operative arm by means of a computer randomized allocation program. All subjects will have X-Ray Images and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to determine the site of the MPFL damage, and to determine if any excluding conditions exist. Subjects randomized to the surgical group will have repair of the MPFL. Routine aftercare will consist of physical therapy in a clinic that has agreed to follow our protocol. Subjects randomized to the nonoperative group will receive 2 weeks of patellar immobilization, followed by patellar stabilization bracing with physical therapy for approximately 12 weeks. Physical therapy will progress through five phases with the goal of gait normalization, full range of motion and return to sport. Both arms will be given outcome questionnaires and physical activity assessments before treatment, and at one, three, six, twelve, and twenty four month intervals. Discussion: This prospective randomized trial will investigate the results of direct repair of the medial patellofemoral ligament and conservative treatment by applying subjective outcome measures (Kujala scores), and exam findings to determine MPFL functional restoration or redislocation. Subjects will be examined in the clinic setting at 10 days, one month, and six months post trauma. Any reported recurrent dislocation or subluxation event will be documented during recovery. All subjects will receive merchant x-ray views at 3 months with manual lateral translation of the patella.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 2, 2014

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 9, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2014

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

March 9, 2017

Status Verified

March 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

July 2, 2014

Last Update Submit

March 7, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Medial patellofemoral ligamentMPFLRepairPatellar dislocationKnee

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient Reported Change in Patellar Stability, Subluxation, or Recurrent Dislocation.

    Subjects will be divided into 3 groups relating to patellar stability: 1. Recurrence, indicating that the patient had a recurrent patellofemoral dislocation (total loss of congruence between the patella and trochlea) prior to 24 months. 2. Unstable, indicating that the patient's knee presented with a positive apprehension test or showed signs of subluxation prior to 24 months, but without recurrent dislocation. 3. Stable, indicating that the patient's knee did not show positive signs of episodes of subluxation at 24 months.

    24 months, or as reported by subject

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Subjective Outcome Measurement (Kujala Test)

    1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months

Study Arms (2)

Surgical Treatment Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Direct Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) Repair

Procedure: Direct Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) Repair

Conservative Treatment Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Immobilization, stabilization bracing, and physical therapy

Procedure: Physical therapy

Interventions

The MPFL will be repaired directly at the site of the traumatic injury.

Also known as: Surgical Treatment Group
Surgical Treatment Group

Patellar immobilization, stabilization, and strengthening under the direction and guidance of the physician and physical therapist.

Also known as: Physiotherapy
Conservative Treatment Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • A first patellofemoral traumatic dislocation
  • A need for reduction
  • An absence of fractures on x-ray exam of the frontal and lateral knee and axial patella
  • An absence of knee ligament lesions with surgical indications (with the exception of the MPFL)
  • No previous knee surgery

You may not qualify if:

  • A prior episode of patellofemoral dislocation
  • Fractures on x-ray exam of the frontal and lateral knee and axial patella Prior surgery on the knee
  • Tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance greater than 20mm
  • Current pregnancy or plan to become pregnant during the study period.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Lyman Knee Clinic

Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, 83814, United States

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Maenpaa H, Huhtala H, Lehto MU. Recurrence after patellar dislocation. Redislocation in 37/75 patients followed for 6-24 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997 Oct;68(5):424-6. doi: 10.3109/17453679708996255.

    PMID: 9385239BACKGROUND
  • Colvin AC, West RV. Patellar instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Dec;90(12):2751-62. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00211.

    PMID: 19047722BACKGROUND
  • Arendt EA, Fithian DC, Cohen E. Current concepts of lateral patella dislocation. Clin Sports Med. 2002 Jul;21(3):499-519. doi: 10.1016/s0278-5919(02)00031-5.

    PMID: 12365240BACKGROUND
  • Arnbjornsson A, Egund N, Rydling O, Stockerup R, Ryd L. The natural history of recurrent dislocation of the patella. Long-term results of conservative and operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992 Jan;74(1):140-2. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.74B1.1732244.

    PMID: 1732244BACKGROUND
  • Aglietti P, Buzzi R, De Biase P, Giron F. Surgical treatment of recurrent dislocation of the patella. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Nov;(308):8-17.

    PMID: 7955706BACKGROUND
  • Sillanpaa PJ, Peltola E, Mattila VM, Kiuru M, Visuri T, Pihlajamaki H. Femoral avulsion of the medial patellofemoral ligament after primary traumatic patellar dislocation predicts subsequent instability in men: a mean 7-year nonoperative follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Aug;37(8):1513-21. doi: 10.1177/0363546509333010. Epub 2009 Apr 17.

    PMID: 19376939BACKGROUND
  • Guerrero P, Li X, Patel K, Brown M, Busconi B. Medial patellofemoral ligament injury patterns and associated pathology in lateral patella dislocation: an MRI study. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2009 Jul 30;1(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1758-2555-1-17.

    PMID: 19643022BACKGROUND
  • Balcarek P, Walde TA, Frosch S, Schuttrumpf JP, Wachowski MM, Sturmer KM. MRI but not arthroscopy accurately diagnoses femoral MPFL injury in first-time patellar dislocations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Aug;20(8):1575-80. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1775-7. Epub 2011 Nov 18.

    PMID: 22095485BACKGROUND
  • Tom A, Fulkerson JP. Restoration of native medial patellofemoral ligament support after patella dislocation. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2007 Jun;15(2):68-71. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e31803035d3.

    PMID: 17505320BACKGROUND
  • Camanho GL, Viegas Ade C, Bitar AC, Demange MK, Hernandez AJ. Conservative versus surgical treatment for repair of the medial patellofemoral ligament in acute dislocations of the patella. Arthroscopy. 2009 Jun;25(6):620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.12.005. Epub 2009 Feb 26.

    PMID: 19501292BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patellar Dislocation

Interventions

Wound HealingPhysical Therapy Modalities

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Joint DislocationsJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesWounds and InjuriesKnee InjuriesLeg Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RegenerationBiological PhenomenaTherapeuticsRehabilitation

Study Officials

  • Jeffrey R Lyman, MD

    Orthopedic Specialty Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2014

First Posted

July 9, 2014

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion

March 1, 2016

Study Completion

March 1, 2016

Last Updated

March 9, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-03

Locations