Study Stopped
Data from LC1033 study of same product indicated lower than expected clinical outcomes; company, STR did not have funds to continue study.
L-C Ligament Versus Hamstring Autograft for Primary ACL Reconstruction
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare safety and efficacy outcomes of the L-C Ligament versus Hamstring Autograft for treatment of acute rupture of the ACL.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Sep 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2020
CompletedNovember 22, 2021
November 1, 2021
4.8 years
June 26, 2014
November 12, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Graft Failure
Revision surgery rate at one year
12 Months
Physical Knee Function measured by the IKDC
Physical Knee Function at 12 Months post procedure
12 Months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Pain Score
Day 1
Adverse event rates
12 months
Other Outcomes (3)
Physical Knee Function as measured by the Lysholm scale
over 24 months
Return to Pre-Injury Physical Activity Levels as measured by the Tegner scale
over 24 months
Knee Outcomes (Pain, symptoms, ability ot perform daily activities, sports, and quality of life) as measured by the KOOS
over 24 months
Study Arms (2)
L-C Ligament
EXPERIMENTALSoft Tissue Regeneration's L-C Ligament is an investigation, interventional device intended for ACL reconstruction surgery within 18 weeks of acute rupture of the ACL and no previous surgical treatment. The L-C Ligament temporarily replaces the human anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and provides a bioresorbable scaffold within and around which the native ACL will regenerate over time.
Hamstring Autograft
ACTIVE COMPARATORHamstring autograft is the active comparator for this study. Autograft tissue is the gold-standard treatment for primary ACL reconstruction.
Interventions
The L-C Ligament is a bioresorbable, three-dimensional (3-D) braided scaffold made from poly L-lactic acid (PLLA) fiber. One device is used to replace the ACL. The L-C Ligament is an interventional device. The L-C Ligament is comprised of three regions: (1) The femoral tunnel attachment site, (2) The ligament region (intra-articular zone), and (3) The tibial tunnel attachment site. For several months after surgery, the L-C Ligament replaces the function of the ACL. During this time, ligament tissue regenerates within and around the L-C Ligament, which is slowly absorbed and replaced by the ACL.
The gold-standard treatment for ACL reconstruction is autograft tissue. Autograft is a piece of tendon harvested from another part of the patient's body, such as the hamstring or kneecap. In this study, the hamstring tendon from the back of the thigh of the injured (target) leg will be harvested and surgically transferred to replace the torn ACL. The attachment of the autologous tendon in the femoral and tibial bone tunnels will utilize techniques that are similar to those for the L-C Ligament. Over time the replacement tendon resorbs and a new ACL is regenerated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with acute ruptures of the ACL who are willing to undergo treatment within 18 weeks of injury
You may not qualify if:
- Prior ACL reconstruction or other surgical procedure on the affected (target) knee
- Chronic ACL injury; interventional surgery scheduled 127 days or more after ACL injury
- Professional athletes currently engaged in active sport
- Prior distal femoral and/or proximal tibial fracture(s) of the target leg
- Previous or current ACL injury on contra-lateral leg
- Multi-ligament reconstruction
- Malalignment or varus thrust
- Patient \> 193 cm tall (6' 4")
- The patient does not follow pre-operative rehabilitation that may have been prescribed post-injury (prior to Index Procedure)
- Confirmed connective tissue disorder
- Signs of moderate to severe degenerative joint disease
- Severe pain, swelling, or redness within 24 hours prior to surgery
- Complete or partial Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) tear
- If concomitant meniscal injury is present, any of the following: 1/3rd meniscal resection; complex double-bucket tear; partially repaired meniscal tears
- Any type of lateral and/or medial meniscal tear which is not repairable (\<2mm from rim)
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Isala Klinieken
Zwolle, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kees van Egmond, MD
Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, The Netherlands
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2014
First Posted
July 8, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2020
Study Completion
July 1, 2020
Last Updated
November 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11