NCT02182843|CompletedResults
Cellentra Viable Cell Bone Matrix (VCBM) Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Outcomes Study (VCBM/MaxAn)
VCBM/ACDF
Loading search results
VCBM/ACDF
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
81
1 country
6
Study Start
March 2014
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
January 2018
Actual (reported)Study Completion
January 2018
Actual (reported)The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients who undergo ACDF procedures using Cellentra Viable Cell Bone Matrix (VCBM), cortical allograft spacers, and the MaxAn® Anterior Cervical Plate System. Cellentra VCBM will be compared to published data for autograft in NDI (Neck Disability Index) improvement and radiographic success of fusion.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
January 2018
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
March 2014
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
July 2, 2014
Actual (reported)July 8, 2014
Actual (reported)January 2018
Actual (reported)January 2018
Actual (reported)March 15, 2019
Actual (reported)Change in NDI From Baseline
Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a patient-completed, condition-specific functional status questionnaire including pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 - 5, with a maximum score of 50. The obtained score is multiplied by 2 to produce a percentage score. A higher score indicates more patient-rated disability (0 points or 0% means : no activity limitations , 50 points or 100% means complete activity limitation). The minimal clinically important difference or change (MCID / MCIC) is described as the smallest difference or change that patients perceive as beneficial. In patients with cervical radiculopathy the MCID is 7 points of change ( 14%). In order to demonstrate improvement in status, the NDI would need to be reduced by at least 14%.
12 months after device implantation
Number of Participants With Radiographic Success at 24 Months
24 Months
Cellentra™ VCBM is an allogenic bone graft containing naturally occurring viable donor cells intended for homologous use in the repair, replacement, reconstruction or supplementation of the recipient's tissue in musculoskeletal defects.
Cellentra™ VCBM is an allogenic bone graft containing naturally occurring viable donor cells intended for homologous use in the repair, replacement, reconstruction or supplementation of the recipient's tissue in musculoskeletal defects.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Barrow Neurological Associates
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013, United States
Fort Wayne Ortho
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46804, United States
Orthopaedic Institute of Western KY
Paducah, Kentucky, 42001, United States
Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43203, United States
The Rothman Institute
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
Spine Team Texas
Southlake, Texas, 75032, United States
Gore DR, Sepic SB. Anterior cervical fusion for degenerated or protruded discs. A review of one hundred forty-six patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984 Oct;9(7):667-71. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198410000-00002.
Palit M, Schofferman J, Goldthwaite N, Reynolds J, Kerner M, Keaney D, Lawrence-Miyasaki L. Anterior discectomy and fusion for the management of neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Nov 1;24(21):2224-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199911010-00009.
Joel Batts
Biomet Spine
81 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
July 2, 2014
First Posted
July 8, 2014
Study Start
March 2014
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
McConnell JR, Freeman BJ, Debnath UK, Grevitt MP, Prince HG, Webb JK. A prospective randomized comparison of coralline hydroxyapatite with autograft in cervical interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Feb 15;28(4):317-23. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000048503.51956.E1.
Samartzis D, Shen FH, Goldberg EJ, An HS. Is autograft the gold standard in achieving radiographic fusion in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid anterior plate fixation? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 1;30(15):1756-61. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000172148.86756.ce.
Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, McEnery KW, Baldus C, Blanke K. Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jun 15;20(12):1410-8.
Soderlund CH, Pointillart V, Pedram M, Andrault G, Vital JM. Radiolucent cage for cervical vertebral reconstruction: a prospective study of 17 cases with 2-year minimum follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2004 Dec;13(8):685-90. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0747-8. Epub 2004 Jun 26.
Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, Grigorian AA, Lee GP, Robinson JS Jr. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 1;32(21):2310-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318154c57e.
Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Campbell MJ, Anderson PA. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. Spine J. 2010 Jun;10(6):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
Young BA, Walker MJ, Strunce JB, Boyles RE, Whitman JM, Childs JD. Responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index in patients with mechanical neck disorders. Spine J. 2009 Oct;9(10):802-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, Musante D, Carmody CN, Gordon CR, Lauryssen C, Ohnmeiss DD, Boltes MO. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Oct;15(4):348-58. doi: 10.3171/2011.5.SPINE10769. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
Davis RJ, Kim KD, Hisey MS, Hoffman GA, Bae HW, Gaede SE, Rashbaum RF, Nunley PD, Peterson DL, Stokes JK. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Nov;19(5):532-45. doi: 10.3171/2013.6.SPINE12527. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
Lofgren H, Engquist M, Hoffmann P, Sigstedt B, Vavruch L. Clinical and radiological evaluation of Trabecular Metal and the Smith-Robinson technique in anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2010 Mar;19(3):464-73. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1161-z. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
Miller LE, Block JE. Safety and effectiveness of bone allografts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 15;36(24):2045-50. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ff37eb.
Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Mar;6(3):198-209. doi: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.3.198.
Primary Completion
January 2018
Actual (reported)Study Completion
January 2018
Actual (reported)Last Updated
March 15, 2019
Results First Posted
March 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: