Safety and Efficacy of Berodual® Inhaled Via Respimat® Compared to MDI (Metered Dose Inhaler) in Pediatric Patients With Asthma
A Randomized, Double-blind Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Berodual® Inhaled Via the Respimat® Device in Two Dosages (50 µg Fenoterol Hydrobromide + 20 µg Ipratropium Bromide and 25 µg Fenoterol Hydrobromide + 10 µg Ipratropium Bromide, 1 Puff t.i.d.) With That of Berodual® Inhaled Via the MDI With Aerochamber® (50 µg Fenoterol Hydrobromide + 21 µg Ipratropium Bromide, 2 Puffs t.i.d.) in Pediatric Patients With Asthma Over a 4 Week Period
1 other identifier
interventional
535
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Study to demonstrate that at least one of the two doses of Berodual® (50 µg fenoterol hydrobromide + 20 µg ipratropium bromide and 25 µg fenoterol hydrobromide + 10 µg ipratropium bromide, 1 puff t.i.d.) administered via Respimat® device gives a bronchodilator response which is not inferior to that obtained from one dose of Berodual® (50 µg fenoterol hydrobromide + 21 µg ipratropium bromide, 2 puffs t.i.d.) administered via the MDI (chlorofluorocarbon-metered dose inhaler) with Aerochamber® and that the safety profile is at least as good when paediatric asthma patients are treated for four weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 asthma
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 1998
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 1999
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2014
CompletedJuly 14, 2014
July 1, 2014
10 months
July 2, 2014
July 11, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in average FEV1 AUC0-1 (FEV1( (Forced expiratory volume in one second) AUC0-1(Area under the curve between 0 and 1 hour ))
pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on day 29
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Average FEV1 between 0 and 1 hour (FEV1 AUC0-1)
pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on days 1 and 15
Total average FEV1 between 0 and 1 hour (FEV1 AUC0-1)
pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on day 29
FVC (Forced vital capacity)
pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on days 1, 15 and 29
FEV25-75% (mean forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC
pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on days 1, 15 and 29
FEV1max
pre-dose and 5, 30, 60 minutes post-dose on days 1 and 29
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Berodual® Respimat®, low dose
EXPERIMENTALBerodual® Respimat®, high dose
EXPERIMENTALBerodual® MDI Aerochamber®
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of bronchial asthma according to the ATS (American Thoracic Society) criteria
- Male or female children between 6 and 15 years old
- Screening FEV1: 60-90 % of predicted normal. Predicted normal values will be based on the reference values by Cotes
- Airway obstruction reversibility: FEV1 should increase ≥ 12% over baseline 30 to 60 minutes after administration of 2 puffs from the Berodual® MDI used with the Aerochamber®
- Ability to be trained in proper use of MDI with Aerochamber® and Respimat®
- Ability to perform technically satisfactory pulmonary function tests
- No hospital admission for an exacerbation and stable dosage of all pulmonary medication in the last four weeks
- Parent(s)/legal guardian is able and willing to give written informed consent in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and local legislation. The child is willing to give oral consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with significant disease other than asthma, e.g. history of clinically significant cardiovascular, renal, neurological, hepatic or endocrine dysfunction (e.g. hyperthyreosis). A clinically significant disease is defined as a disease which in the opinion of the investigator may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study or which may influence the results of the study or the ability of the patient to participate in and complete the study
- Tuberculosis with indication for treatment
- History of cancer within the last five years
- Patients who have undergone thoracotomy
- Current psychiatric disorders
- History of life threatening pulmonary obstruction, active bronchiectasis, lung fibrosis, AIDS (acquired immunity deficiency syndrome) and cystic fibrosis
- Severe bronchial asthma with frequent nocturnal asthma attacks or acute exacerbations induced by recurrent bronchial infections several times per year
- An upper or lower respiratory tract infection in the four weeks prior to the screening visit (= Visit 1) or during the 2-week run-in period
- Patients with known narrow-angle glaucoma or raised intra-ocular pressure
- Patients with known intolerance or hypersensitivity to any of the trial medication including excipients
- Patients using oral corticosteroid medication within the last 4 weeks
- Patients using leukotriene receptor antagonists and 5-LO (lipoxygenase) inhibitors within the last 4 weeks
- Beta-blocker medication
- Patients who have taken an investigational drug one month or six half-lives (whichever is greater) prior to the screening visit
- Previous participation in the run-in phase of this study
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2014
First Posted
July 8, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 1998
Primary Completion
July 1, 1999
Last Updated
July 14, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-07