Identifying the Most Accurate Method for Predicting the Safe Depth of Orally Placed Neonatal Endotracheal Tubes (ETT).
2 other identifiers
observational
8
2 countries
5
Brief Summary
Placing artificial airways in infants is often performed under emergent life-saving conditions, which necessitates a procedure that is both accurate and efficient. Intubations of the newborn are often necessary before an accurate weight can be reported and estimations are often inaccurate. The current national standard uses body weight to predict the appropriate tube depth yet this approach tends to place the tube too deep for the smallest and most vulnerable neonate; and placement accuracy of any size infant is only 50-70%. The consequence of malpositioned ETTs resulting from poor oxygenation, lung hyperinflation, pneumothoraces and death has been suggested to cost $20 to $54 million annually. The morbidity and the financial impact suggest an optimal and accurate approach to place ETT in neonates has not been identified. Other methods to estimate the proper depth of the orotracheal tube have shown promise yet no comparison studies have been performed. Identifying the most accurate method to safely place neonatal orotracheal tubes will improve placement precision and reduce adverse events and their associated costs. Hypothesis Compared to weight, sternal to xyphoid length and shoulder to elbow length, the nasal to tragus length will become the most accurate method for predicting the safe depth of orally placed neonatal endotracheal tubes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Nov 2014
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 4, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2016
CompletedJuly 26, 2018
July 1, 2018
1.7 years
July 2, 2014
July 24, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The differences between 4 measurement methods in placing a neonatal ETT between the lower border of T1 and upper margin of T3 on chest radiograph.
Up to 3 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The differences in head position in placing a neonatal ETT between the lower border of T1 and upper margin of T3 on chest radiograph.
Up to 3 years
Study Arms (1)
Orally intubated infants
Subjects will be \<72 hours of age and orally intubated. Following consent, four measures will be reported (i.e. body weight, nasal to tragus length, suprasternal notch to xyphoid process and shoulder to elbow length). Measures will be compared against a chest x-ray and placement of ETT at the subjects lip to identify the most accurate method to place endotracheal tubes in the newborn.
Eligibility Criteria
Infants \<72 hours of age and orally intubated
You may qualify if:
- Infants orally intubated and admitted into the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous intubation
- Hydrops fetalis
- Thoracic congenital anomalies
- Facial abnormalities
- Naso-tracheal intubation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90027, United States
Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
The Coombe Women & Infants University Hospital
Dublin, Ireland
The Rotunda Hospital
Dublin, Ireland
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susan L Moran, DNP APRN NNP-BC FFNMRCSI
Children's Hospital Colorado
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2014
First Posted
July 4, 2014
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
July 1, 2016
Last Updated
July 26, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07