NCT02175706

Brief Summary

Rationale: The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity but there are further demands on DES performance. Such demands are an optimized performance in very challenging coronary lesions; third generation DES were developed in an effort to further improve DES performance in such challenging lesions. Two CE-certified third generation DES (Resolute Integrity and Promus Element stents) are currently available; there are no data that indicate an advantage of one of these DES over the other. Objective: To investigate whether the clinical outcome is similar after implantation of the Promus Element versus the Resolute Integrity stent (non-inferiority hypothesis). Study design: Multicenter, prospective, randomized single-blinded study. Study population: Patients who require percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for the treatment of coronary stenoses with an indication for DES use, according to current guidelines and/or the operators clinical judgement. All clinical syndromes will be included. Intervention: In patients who are eligible for DES implantation, the type of DES implanted will be randomized (Resolute Integrity stent versus Promus Element stent). At the start of the study, both DES will also be used in routine clinical practice. Main study endpoints: The primary endpoint is the incidence of target vessel failure at one year follow-up. Target vessel failure (TVF) is a composite endpoint consisting of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization. Further secondary clinical and angiographic endpoints will be investigated, defined in accordance with suggestions of the Academic Research Consortium (ARC). Of note, the angiographic assessment is based on clinically indicated projections only and results in no additional x-ray exposure. There is no routine angiographic follow-up. If angiographic data are available in patients who undergo symptom-driven re-catheterization, we will analyze these data to get insight into the mechanisms of potential DES restenosis. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients will receive the routine clinical treatment. As a consequence, the risks of this trial do not exceed the risks of any routine PCI procedure.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
1,811

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2010

Longer than P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2010

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2013

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 27, 2013

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 26, 2014

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2017

Status Verified

February 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

November 27, 2013

Last Update Submit

February 2, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Target-vessel failure (TVF)

    Components of the primary endpoint in hierarchical order: 1. Cardiac death. All deaths are considered cardiac, unless an unequivocal non-cardiac cause can be established; 2. Target vessel related MI that is Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction that can be related to the target vessel or cannot be related to another vessel; 3. Clinically driven repeated target vessel revascularization by means of CABG or PCI.

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Death at 1 and 2 year follow-up

    1 and 2 year

  • Myocardial infarction at 1 and 2 year follow-up

    1 and 2 year

  • Revascularization at 1 and 2 year follow-up

    1 and 2 year

  • Stent thrombosis at 1 and 2 year follow-up

    1 and 2 year

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Longitudinal stent deformation

    1 year

Study Arms (2)

Resolute Integrity®

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The coating of Resolute Integrity consists of zotarolimus as antiproliferative agent and the BioLinx® polymer system. This polymer system consists of a blend of three different polymers: (1) the hydrophobic C10 polymer, which aids in the control of drug release; (2) the hydrophilic C19 polymer, which supports biocompatibility; and (3) polyvinyl pyrro-lidinone, which increases the initial drug burst and enhances the elution rate.

Device: Resolute Integrity®

Promus Element®

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Promus Element utilizes everolimus, which has been shown to reduce tissue proliferation in the coronary vessels following stent implantation. Promus Element is composed of the Element platform, a thin fluoropolymer coating, and Everolimus.

Device: Promus Element®

Interventions

Biolinx-zotarolimus coating on a chobalt-cromium alloy stent platform that has a novel sinusoidal design.

Also known as: Resolute Integrity® drug eluting stent
Resolute Integrity®

fluoropolymer-everolimus coating on a novel stent platform made from a platinum-chromium alloy

Also known as: Promus Element® drug eluting stent
Promus Element®

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Minimum age of 18 years;
  • Coronary artery disease and lesion(s) eligable for treatment with drug eluting stents according to clinical guidelines and/or the operators' judgement;
  • Patient is willing and able to cooperate with study procedures and required follow-up visits; and patient has been informed and agrees on the participation by signing an EC approved written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participation in another randomized drug or device study before reaching primary endpoint;
  • Planned surgery within 6 months of PCI unless dual antiplatelet therapy is maintained throughout the peri-surgical period;
  • Intolerance to aspirin, clopidogrel or ticlopidin, heparin, or components of the two DES examined;
  • Known pregnancy;
  • Life expectancy of less than 1 year.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Medisch Centrum Alkmaar

Alkmaar, Netherlands

Location

Ziekenhuis Rijnstate

Arnhem, Netherlands

Location

Scheper Ziekenhuis

Emmen, Netherlands

Location

Medisch Spectrum Twente

Enschede, Netherlands

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery DiseaseAngina PectorisAngina, UnstableAcute Coronary SyndromeCoronary StenosisCoronary Restenosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular DiseasesChest PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Clemens von Birgelen, MD,PhD,Prof

    Thorax Centrum Twente

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2013

First Posted

June 26, 2014

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion

May 1, 2013

Study Completion

June 1, 2017

Last Updated

February 3, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-02

Locations