Gestational Weight Gain in Primary Care
Curbing Gestational Weight Gain in Primary Care: Using Technology Based on Behaviour Change Theory
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Excess weight gain in pregnancy is linked to a number of adverse outcomes for mothers and their offspring, and in 2011, 59 % of women in Nova Scotia gained weight in excess of recommendations. A number of factors influence how much weight a woman gains, including lack of knowledge, age, the number of previous pregnancies she's had, smoking, ethnicity, income, and education. Although a clinician's advice also plays a role, simply giving advice does not necessarily translate into patient behaviour change. On the other hand, advice that is given through a patient-centred approach is significantly associated with increased patient acceptance of and adherence to recommendations, and increased intentions and attempts at behaviour change. In addition, this approach has been shown to decrease costs to the health care system. Patient-centredness can measured from the perspective of the clinician, an observer, or the patient. Research suggests that the patient's perspective of patient-centredness is the perspective most significantly associated with improved health outcomes. Clinicians avoid discussing weight-related matters for a number of reasons, including a lack of time and general discomfort in raising the subject. There are some tools that can address some of these barriers, and example being the "5As of Obesity Management". This tool is based on principles of behaviour change science and patient-centredness. Pilot data on the use of this tool showed a two-fold increase in the initiation of weight-related discussions between clinicians and their patients. Our team was instrumental in the development, dissemination and initial evaluation of this tool, and Dr. Piccinini-Vallis has recently led a national multidisciplinary endeavor to adapt it to pregnancy, which has resulted in the "5As of Healthy Pregnancy Weight Gain" tool. It is now time to evaluate whether the use of this tool is acceptable to clinicians and whether its use translates into any patient outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 26, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2018
CompletedApril 30, 2018
April 1, 2018
1.2 years
March 28, 2014
April 26, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Guideline-concordance of women's total gestational weight gain
The congruence of total gestational weight gain with Institute of Medicine guidelines based on pre-pregnancy body mass index
12 months
Study Arms (2)
5As
EXPERIMENTALPhysicians' use of the 5As tool to discuss gestational weight gain with their pregnant patients
Usual care
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsual care by physicians in addressing gestational weight gain with their pregnant patients
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Family physicians providing prenatal care
- Patients who are pregnant
You may not qualify if:
- Multiple pregnancy
- Abnormal pregnancy
- Inability to read and inability to speak English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Helena Piccininilead
- Nova Scotia Health Authoritycollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Halifax Regional Municipality
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Nova Scotia Health Authority
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Family Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2014
First Posted
June 26, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
March 31, 2018
Study Completion
March 31, 2018
Last Updated
April 30, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04