Diagnosis of Microaspiration in Intubated Critically Ill Patients: Pepsin vs 99m Technetium
2 other identifiers
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Microaspiration of contaminated oropharyngeal secretions and gastric contents frequently occurs in intubated critically ill patients, and plays a major role in the pathogenesis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Quantitative pepsin measurement in tracheal aspirates would be useful in diagnosing microaspiration of gastric contents in intubated critically ill patients. Technetium 99m labelled enteral feeding is the gold standard for the diagnosis of microaspiration. The investigators hypothesized that tracheal pepsin measurement is a good diagnosis marker of microaspiration compared to the gold standard.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Sep 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 18, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 23, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedDecember 4, 2015
December 1, 2015
1 year
June 18, 2014
December 3, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
incidence of pepsin levels ≥200 ng / ml
Sensibility and sensitivity of Pepsin for the diagnosis of microaspiration will be determined with regard to 99m technetium (gold standard).
from the start to 6 hours after beginning of 99m technetium labelled enteral feeding
Secondary Outcomes (4)
likelihood ratio of pepsin of microregurgitation
from the start to 6 hours after beginning of 99m technetium labelled enteral feeding
likelihood ratio of pepsin of microaspiration
from the start to 6 hours after beginning of 99m technetium labelled enteral feeding
Youden Index
from the start to 6 hours after beginning of 99m technetium labelled enteral feeding
ROC curve
from the start to 6 hours after beginning of 99m technetium labelled enteral feeding
Study Arms (1)
99mTc-Rhenium Sulfide Nanocolloid
EXPERIMENTAL99mTc-Rhenium Sulfide Nanocolloid
Interventions
12 MBq of NanoCis added to 500 ml of enteral feeding
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age \> or = 18 years
- hospitalised in ICU
- tracheal intubation using a polyvinyl chloride tube and mechanical ventilation
- enteral nutrition by a nasogastric tube
You may not qualify if:
- refuse to participate to the study
- no informed consent
- pregnant
- contra-indication for enteral nutrition
- tracheotomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ICU, Calmette Hospital, University Hospital of Lille
Lille, 59037, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Saad Nseir, MD, PhD
Univ Hosp of Lille, France
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 18, 2014
First Posted
June 23, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
December 4, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12