NCT02169102

Brief Summary

Anxiety, pain and discomfort are common stressful situations that occur during the dentistry practice, especially in the urgency endodontic practice. Studies have concluded that low intensity laser therapy is effective in treating pain. However, most studies have reported the low intensity laser therapy in chronic pain, few studies have shown its application on acute pain and none have evaluated the low intensity laser´s analgesic effect in acute pain of the pulp inflammation. Since the pulp tissue has the peculiar characteristic to be surrounded by dentin, in acute pulpits, the inflammatory reaction is more complicated than usual. Furthermore, during the inflammatory process, sometimes anesthesia is not always completely effective. Thus, this present study aims to evaluate whether previous therapy with low intensity laser could, by its analgesic effect, promote greater comfort especially to this type of patient. 60 patients with acute pulpits pain will be selected to this study (randomized and double-blinded) and they will be divided in 4 groups: Group 1 ( n=15) - Control Group; Group 2 (n=15) - Laser 1: 780 nanometers (nm); 40 milliwatts (mW); 4 seconds per point; 0.16 Joules/point; total irradiated points: 02; Group 3 (n=15) - Laser 2: 780nm; 40 mW; 40 seconds per point; 1.6 Joules/point, total irradiated points: 02; Group 4 (n=15) - Placebo group - Sham Laser Irradiation. The pain will be evaluated by a visual analogue scale (VAS) in 3 different times: initial pain, pain immediately after and 15 minutes after interventions (laser irradiation, or sham laser irradiation). After that, patients with acute pulp irreversible inflammation will be submitted to conventional endodontic urgency treatment. Data concerning the need of complimentary local anesthesia will be also taken into account. Data of different groups and times will be statistically compared.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2013

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2013

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2014

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 18, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 20, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

April 14, 2015

Status Verified

April 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

June 18, 2014

Last Update Submit

April 10, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Low power laserPulpitisPain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Tooth pain modulation during irreversible pulp inflammation after low power laser irradiation

    Pain will be measured through VAS (Visual Analog Scale).

    Immediately after low power laser irradiation and 15 minutes after low power laser irradiation

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Need of anesthetic supplementation during urgency endodontic treatment

    15 minutes

Study Arms (4)

Control

OTHER
Other: No additional Intervention (control)

Sham Laser

SHAM COMPARATOR
Radiation: Sham Laser Irradiation

Laser 1

EXPERIMENTAL

Low Power Laser applied at 0.16 Joules/point. 2 points of laser irradiation

Radiation: Laser 1 (at 0,16 Joules/point of irradiation)

Laser 2

EXPERIMENTAL

Low Power Laser applied at 16 Joules/point. 2 points of laser irradiation

Radiation: Laser 2 (1,6 Joules/point of irradiation)

Interventions

No additional intervention previously to the urgency endodontic treatment (Control)

Control

Fifteen minutes previously the urgency endodontic treatment, sham laser irradiation was performed in the tooth with irreversible inflammation in pulp.

Sham Laser

Fifteen minutes previously the urgency endodontic treatment, laser irradiation will be performed in the tooth with irreversible inflammation in pulp at 0,16 Joules/point at 2 points (perpendicularly to tooth crown and in periapex region)

Laser 1

Fifteen minutes previously the urgency endodontic treatment, laser irradiation will be performed in the tooth with irreversible inflammation in pulp at 1,6 Joules/point at 2 points (perpendicularly to tooth crown and in periapex region)

Laser 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with acute pain due to irreversible inflammation of the a vital pulp tooth

You may not qualify if:

  • Non-Intact Pulp chamber
  • Necrotic pulp

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo

São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-000, Brazil

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PulpitisAcute PainPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dental Pulp DiseasesTooth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Larissa MP Souza, DDS

    School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Carlos A Adde, PhD

    School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Karen M Ramalho, PhD

    School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Isabel P Tortamano, PhD

    School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Carlos P Eduardo, PhD

    School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Rodney G Rocha, PhD

    School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2014

First Posted

June 20, 2014

Study Start

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion

June 1, 2014

Study Completion

October 1, 2014

Last Updated

April 14, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-04

Locations